The influence of national culture on changes in R&D expenses among agrochemical firms

DOI:10.17221/230/2016-AGRICECONCitation:Jirasek M. (2017): The influence of national culture on changes in R&D expenses among agrochemical firms. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 63: 524-530.
download PDF

Research and development (R&D) represents a significant expenditure and investment into the future competitiveness of a given firm. The behavioural theory of the firm assumes that these expenditures are subject to changes caused by performance feedback. This paper builds upon these assumptions and extends them by considering the possible effect of national cultures on the nature of these responses to the performance feedback. The research follows 119 firms from nine countries over the period 2001–2015 and analyses their behaviour using generalized linear mixed models. The findings mostly support an effect of national cultures, measured by Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, on changes in R&D expenditure and indicate that national culture is one of the factors which needs to be taken into account when utilizing the behavioural theory of the firm.

Bromiley Philip, Harris Jared D. (2014): A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 338-357 doi:10.1002/smj.2191
Bromiley P., Washburn M. (2011): Cost reduction vs innovative search in R&D. Journal of Strategy and Management, 4: 196–214.
Cyert R.M., March J.G. (1963): A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Chen W.-R., Miller K.D. (2007): Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 369–381.
Franke George R, Richey R Glenn (2010): Improving generalizations from multi-country comparisons in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1275-1293 doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.21
Greve H.R. (2003): Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hofstede G.H., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. (2010): Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. 3rd Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
House R.J., Hanges P.J., Javidan M., Dorfman P.W., Gupta V. (2004): Culture, leadership, and organizations: the Globe study of 62 societies. Sage, Thousands Oak.
IBISWorld (2016): Global Fertilizers & Agricultural Chemicals Manufacturing: Market Research Report. Available at (accessed Jun 24, 2016).
Jirasek M. (2016): Innovative behavior of U.S. Pharmaceutical Firms. In: Grant K.A., Wise S. (eds): Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Academic Conferences and Publishing International, Reading.
Kahneman Daniel, Tversky Amos (1979): Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263- doi:10.2307/1914185
Lewellyn K.B., Bao S. (2015): R&D investment in the global paper products industry: A behavioral theory of the firm and national culture perspective. Journal of International Management, 21: 1–17.
McSweeney Brendan (2016): Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith - a Failure of Analysis. Human Relations, 55, 89-118 doi:10.1177/0018726702551004
O’Brien J.P., David P. (2014): Reciprocity and R&D search: Applying the behavioral theory of the firm to a communitarian context. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 550–565.
Singh S., Kiran R., Goyal D. (2015): Identification of key factors for enhancing competitiveness: an exploratory study of the selected agri-biotech firms of Punjab in India. Agricultural Economics, 61: 179–188.
Trostel A. O., Nichols M. L. (1982): Privately-Held and Publicly-Held Companies: A Comparison of Strategic Choices and Management Processes.. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 47-62 doi:10.2307/256023
Washburn Mark, Bromiley Philip (2012): Comparing Aspiration Models: The Role of Selective Attention. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 896-917 doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01033.x
download PDF

© 2017 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences