Differences in oviposition and egg quality of various genotypes of laying hens

https://doi.org/10.17221/22/2017-CJASCitation:Tůmová E., Vlčková J., Chodová D. (2017): Differences in oviposition and egg quality of various genotypes of laying hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 62: 377-383.
download PDF
The differences in egg production traits in six laying hen genotypes (brown-egg hens Bovans Brown, Bovans Sperwer, ISA Sussex; white-egg hen Dekalb White; laying hens with tinted shells Moravia Barred and Moravia BSL) and the interactions of genotype and oviposition on egg quality were evaluated. The genotype affected the laying rate (P ≤ 0.003), mean sequence length (P ≤ 0.001), and time of oviposition (P ≤ 0.001). The brown-egg genotypes laid eggs approximately 1 h earlier than the white-egg genotypes and approximately 2 h earlier than the tinted-egg genotypes. Egg shell strength was the lowest in tinted-egg genotypes (P ≤ 0.001) and declined with the time of oviposition (P ≤ 0.002). Egg shell percentage (P ≤ 0.011) and thickness (P ≤ 0.011) were affected by the interaction of genotype and oviposition. None of the effects affected egg weight; however, the proportion of egg components was significantly influenced by the interaction of genotype and oviposition. The study confirmed that the differences in the egg production and egg quality of various genotypes are associated with the laying pattern.
Blanco A. E., Icken W., Ould-Ali D., Cavero D., Schmutz M. (2014): Genetic parameters of egg quality traits on different pedigree layers with special focus on dynamic stiffness. Poultry Science, 93, 2457-2463 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04132
Campo J.L., Gil M.G., Davila S.G. (2007): Differences among white, tinted, and brown-egg laying hens for incidence of eggs laid on the floor and for oviposition time. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 71, 105‒109.
Ebeid T., Tumova E. (2004): Physiological aspects of oviposition and its role in egg quality: a review. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 35, 32–40.
Johnston S.A., Gous R.M. (2010): A mechanistic, stochastic, population model of egg production. British Poultry Science, 48, 224-232 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701227493
Kaur R., Rathgeber B. M., Thompson K. L., MacIsaac J. (2013): Uterine fluid proteins and egg quality characteristics for 2 commercial and 2 heritage laying hen lines in response to manipulation of dietary calcium and vitamin D3. Poultry Science, 92, 2419-2432 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02983
Ketta M., Tůmová E. (2016): Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: a review. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61, 299-309 https://doi.org/10.17221/46/2015-CJAS
Kim Chang-Ho, Song Jong-Ho, Lee Jae-Cheong, Lee Kyung-Woo (2014): Age-Related Changes in Egg Quality of Hy-Line Brown Hens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 13, 510-514 https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2014.510.514
Lewis P. D., Perry G. C., Morris T. R. (2007): Effect of photoperiod on the mean oviposition time of two breeds of laying hen. British Poultry Science, 36, 33-37 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417750
Pavlovski Z., Vitorovic D., Skrbic Z., Vracar S. (2000): Influence of limestone particle size in diets for hens and oviposition time on eggshell quality. Acta Veterinaria Beograd, 50, 37‒42.
ROLAND D. A. (1978): The Relationship of Egg Shape to Time of Oviposition and Egg Shell Quality. Poultry Science, 57, 1723-1727 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0571723
Samiullah Sami, Omar Amal Saleh, Roberts Juliet, Chousalkar Kapil (2016): Effect of production system and flock age on eggshell and egg internal quality measurements. Poultry Science, 96, 246-258 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew289
Skřivan M., Englmaierová M., Skřivanová E., Bubancová I. (2016): Increase in lutein and zeaxanthin content in the eggs of hens fed marigold flower extract. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 60, 87-96 https://doi.org/10.17221/8073-CJAS
Skřivan M., Englmaierová M., Marounek M., Skřivanová V., Taubner T., Vít T. (2016): Effect of dietary magnesium, calcium, phosphorus, and limestone grain size on productive performance and eggshell quality of hens. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61, 473-480 https://doi.org/10.17221/3/2016-CJAS
Suk Y. O., Park C. (2001): Effect of Breed and Age of Hens on the Yolk to Albumen Ratio in Two Different Genetic Stocks. Poultry Science, 80, 855-858 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.7.855
Tumova E., Ebeid T. (2005): Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in cages and in a litter housing system. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 50, 129–134.
Tumova E., Gous R.M. (2012): Interaction between oviposition time, age, and environmental temperature and egg quality traits in laying hens and broiler breeders. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57, 541‒549.
Tumova E., Ledvinka Z. (2009): The effect of time of oviposition and age on egg weight, egg components weight and eggshell quality. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 73, 110‒115.
Tumova E., Skrivan M., Englmaierova M., Zita L. (2009): The effect of genotype, housing system and egg collection time on egg quality in egg type hens. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54, 17‒23.
Tumova E., Englmaierova M., Ledvinka Z., Charvatova V. (2011): Interaction between housing system and genotype in relation to internal and external egg quality parameters. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 56, 490‒498.
Tumova E., Gous R.M., Tyler N. (2014): Effect of hen age, environmental temperature, and oviposition on egg shell quality and egg shell and serum mineral contents in laying and broiler breeder hens. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 59, 435‒443.
Tumova E., Vlckova J., Charvatova V., Drabek O., Tejnecky V., Ketta M., Chodova D. (2016): Interactions of genotype, housing and dietary calcium in layer performance, eggshell quality and tibia characteristics. South African Journal of Animal Science, 46, 285‒293.
Yannakopoulos A.L., Tserveni-Gousi A.S., Nikokyris P. (1994): Egg composition as influenced by time of oviposition, egg weight, and age of hens. Archüv für Geflügelkunde, 58, 206–213.
Zakaria A.H., Omar O.H. (2013): Egg laying pattern, egg weight, body weight at hatch, and sex ratio bias relative to oviposition time of young-and mid-age broiler breeders. Animal Reproduction Science, 141, 80-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.07.005
Zakaria A. H., Plumstead P. W., Romero-Sanchez H., Leksrisompong N., Osborne J., Brake J. (2005): Oviposition pattern, egg weight, fertility, and hatchability of young and old broiler breeders. Poultry Science, 84, 1505-1509 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.9.1505
download PDF

© 2018 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences