Czech J. Food Sci., 2009, 27(10):S267-S270 | DOI: 10.17221/949-CJFS
Comparison of the Sensory Characteristics of Suckling Lamb Meat: Organic vs Conventional Production
- 1 Área de Tecnología de Alimentos, Universidad de Salamanca, E.P.S. de Zamora, 49022 Zamora, Spain
- 2 Area de Producción Animal, Universidad de Salamanca, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Ambientales, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- 3 Facultad de Química, Departamento de Alimentos y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D. F.04510, México, *E-mail: irevilla@usal.es
40 L. dorsi muscles from the left half carcass of suckling lambs raised under both organic and conventional systems were evaluated by a sixteen-member trained panel, following QDA methodology. After developing a common vocabulary for the evaluation of characteristics, 30 meat descriptors in raw and grilled meat were selected. Additionally, overall appreciation was evaluated by 140 consumers in a home-use test. The results obtained show that the appearance of the organic meat was more fibrous, darker, and with a lower aroma intensity than the conventional counterpart, but with no differences in homogeneity or juiciness. In grilled meat, the organic samples had less subcutaneous fat, less fatness, a less fibrous texture and less aroma intensity, but also less juiciness. Regarding overall appreciation, the consumers gave higher scores to the organically produced samples.
Keywords: QDA analysis; suckling lamb; organic production; consumer preferences
Published: June 30, 2009 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- AMSA (1978): Guidelines for cookery and sensory evaluation of meat. American Meat Science Association. National Livestock and Meat Board, Chicago.
- Angood K.M., Word J.D., Nute G.R. Whittington F.M., Hughes S.I., Sheard P.R. (2007): A comparison of organic and conventionally-produced lamb purchased from three major UK supermarkets: Price, eating quality and fatty acid composition. Meat Science, 78: 176-184.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Carlucci A., Napolitano F., Girolami A., Monteleone E. (1999): Methodological approach to evaluate the effects of age at slaughter and storage temperature and time on sensory profile of lamb meat. Meat Science, 52: 391-395.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Corcoran K., Bernués A., Manrique E., Pacchioli T., Baines R., Boutonnet J.P. (1999): A system approach to quality assurance: consumer attitudes towards red meat. In: Proceedings of Seminar Production Systems and Product Quality. FAO-CIHEAM. 13-15 Sept, Murcia, Spain.
- Heaney M. (2001): The growing UK organic food sector. In: Meat Demand Trends. Meat and Livestock Commission Milton Keyness, London.
- Lawless H., Haymann H. (1998): Sensory Evaluation of Food. Principles and Practices. Chapman & Hall, Food Science Texts Series, New York.
Go to original source...
- O'Donovan P., McCarthy M. (2002): Irish consumer preference for organic meat. British Food Journal, 104: 353-370.
Go to original source...
- Palacios C., Revilla I., Vivar-Quintana A.M., Lurueña-Martínez M.A., Severiano-Pérez P. (2008): Consumer appreciation of carcass quality of organic vs conventional suckling lamb production. In: Proceedings 16th IFOAM Organic World Congress Cultivating the Future Based on Science. Vol. 2. ISOFAR, Bonn: 622-625.
- Revilla I., Vivar-Quintana A.M., Lurueña-Martínez M.A., Palacios C., Severiano-Pérez P. (2008): Organic vs conventional suckling lamb production: product quality and consumer acceptance. In: Cultivating the Future Based on Science. Vol. 2. ISOFAR, Bonn: 514-517.
- Revilla I., Vivar-Quintana A.M., Lurueña-Martínez M.A., Palacios C, Wilches D., Rovira J., Jaime I. (2009): Análisis de compuestos volátiles de carne de lechazo de producción ecológica y convencional. ITEA. (In press)
- Sañudo C., Sanchez A., Alfonso M. (1998): Small ruminant production systems and factors affecting lamb meat quality. Meat Science, 49: S29-S64.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.