Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2007, 52(5):117-121 | DOI: 10.17221/2234-CJAS

Effect of pre-stimulation on milk flow pattern and distribution of milk constituents at a quarter level

V. Tančin1, M. Uhrinčať1, L. Mačuhová1, R.M. Bruckmaier2
1 Slovak Centre of Agricultural Research, Nitra, Slovak Republic
2 Veterinary Physiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland

The aim of this study was to investigate milk flow patterns and milk composition in relation to pre-milking udder stimulation. The milk of one quarter of each of the sixteen cows was removed separately and in the course of milking it was divided into six fractions (P cisternal milk during milking without stimulation and the first 300 ml during milking with pre-stimulation, 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, 75-100%, 75-100%, MS-machine stripping) and into five portions (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 100% + MS). Two milkings were performed during two consecutive evening milkings with or without manual stimulation. Pre-stimulation resulted in a reduction of milking time, duration of the increase and decline phase of milk flow, stripping yield, but it increased the peak flow rate as compared to milking without pre-stimulation (P < 0.05). In both fractions and portions the content of fat increased steadily during milking and reached a maximum at MS. Lactose increased from P to 50-75% and then it decreased to MS. Significantly higher fat contents at 25% and 50% portions and in both protein and dry matter at 25% portions were found during milking with pre-stimulation as compared to no stimulation (P < 0.05). The content of fat, protein and dry matter were also higher in both P and 0-25% fractions for milking with pre-stimulation (P < 0.05). Pre-stimulation positively influenced the parameters of milk flow and therefore the efficiency of milk removal and contributed to better distribution of components in milk fractions during milking.

Keywords: dairy cows; milking; stimulation, quarter; milk flow; milk constituents

Published: May 31, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tančin V, Uhrinčať M, Mačuhová L, Bruckmaier RM. Effect of pre-stimulation on milk flow pattern and distribution of milk constituents at a quarter level. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2007;52(5):117-121. doi: 10.17221/2234-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ayadi M., Caja G., Such X., Rovai M., Albanell E. (2004): Effect of different milking intervals on the composition of cisternal and alveolar milk in dairy cows. J. Dairy Res., 71, 304-310. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Brandsma S. (1978): The relation between milking, residual milk and milk yield. In: Proc. Int. Symp. Machine Milking, 17 th Annu. Mtg. Natl. Mast. Council, Inc., Louisville, Kentucky, 47-56.
    3. Bruckmaier R.M., Blum J.W. (1996): Simultaneous recording of oxytocin release, milk ejection and milk flow during milking of dairy cows with and without prestimulation. J. Dairy Res., 63, 201-208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Bruckmaier R.M., Blum J.W. (1998): Oxytocin release and milk removal in ruminants. J. Dairy Sci., 81, 939-949. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Bruckmaier R.M., Ontsouka C.E., Blum J.W. (2004): Fractionized milk composition in dairy cows with subclinical mastitis. Vet. Med. - Czech, 49, 238-290. Go to original source...
    6. Gorewit R.C., Gassman K.B. (1985): Effects of duration of udder stimulation on milking dynamics and oxytocin release. J. Dairy Sci., 68, 1813-1818. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Johansson B.B., Olofsson J., Wiktorsson H., UvnasMoberg K., Svennersten-Sjaunja K. (1998): A comparison between manual prestimulation versus feeding stimulation during milking in dairy cows. Swedish J. Agric. Res., 28, 177-187.
    8. Ontsouka C.E., Bruckmaier R.M., Blum J.W. (2003): Fractionized milk composition during removal of colostrums and mature milk. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 2005-2011. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Philpot W.N., Nickerson S.C. (1991): Mastitis: counter attack. A strategy to combat mastitis. Published by Babson Bros. Co., Naperville, IL.
    10. Rittershaus C., Seufert H., Wolter W. (2001): Evaluation of milking routine by using LactoCorder in combination with cytobacterial analysis of the milk of Holstein Frisian. In: Rosati A., Mihina Š., Mosconi C. (eds.): Physiological and Technical Aspects of Machine Milking, Proc. ICAR technical series No. 7, 26.-27. June 2001, Nitra, 69-73.
    11. SAS (2001): Institute Inc. 8.2, Cary, NC, USA.
    12. Sarikaya H., Bruckmaier R.M. (2006): Importance of the sampled milk fraction for the prediction of total quarter somatic cell count. J. Dairy Sci., 89, 4246-4250. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Sarikaya H., Werner-Misof C., Atzkern M., Bruckmaier R.M. (2005): Distribution of leucocyte population, and milk composition, in milk fraction of healthy quarter in dairy cows. J. Dairy Res., 72, 436-492. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Tančin V., Ipema A.H., Hogewerf P., Groot Koerkamp P., Mihina Š., Bruckmaier R. (2002): Milk flow patterns at the end of milking analysed on the udder or quarter levels: relationship to somatic cell counts. Milchwissenshaft, 507, 306-309.
    15. Tančin V., Ipema A.H., Peškovičová D., Hogewerf P., Mačuhová J. (2003): Quarter milk flow patterns in dairy cows: factors involved and repeatability. Vet. Med.- Czech., 48, 275-282. Go to original source...
    16. Tančin V., Ipema B., Hogewerf P. (2005): The quarter milk flow patterns influenced by stage of lactation and milkability in multiparous dairy cows. In: Tančin V., Mihina S., Uhrinčať M. (eds.): Physiological and Technical Aspects of Machine Milking, Proc. ICAR technical series No. 10, 26.-28. April 2005, Nitra, 33-40.
    17. Tančin V., Ipema A.H., Hogewerf P., Mačuhová J. (2006): Sources of variation in milk flow characteristics at udder and quarter levels. J. Dairy Sci., 89, 978-988. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Waldmann A., Ropstad E., Landsverk K., Sorensen K., Solverod L., Dahl E. (1999): Level and distribution of progesterone in bovine milk in relation to storage in the mammary gland. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 56, 79-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Wellnitz O., Bruckmaier R.M., Blum J.W. (1999): Milk ejection and milk removal of single quarters in high yielding dairy cows. Milchwissenschaft, 54, 303-306.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content