Multi-criteria evaluation model to face phytosanitary emergencies: The case of citrus fruits farming in Italy A., Sturiale L. (2016): Multi-criteria evaluation model to face phytosanitary emergencies: The case of citrus fruits farming in Italy. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 62: 205-214.
download PDF
In the last decade, citrus fruits farming, at the international level, revealed an upward trend changing the traditional scenarios of the offer, with the exchange of products coming from all areas of the world, thanks to the progressive abrogation of fare barriers. The material exchange is causing spreading of diseases that have caused a severe damage, such as the epidemics and culture extinctions with a high economic, health, environmental and social impact. In such a context, the definition of possible methods to face the emergencies is absolutely necessary. This research suggests the adoption of an evaluation model for phytosanitary emergencies (Citrus Tristeza Virus – CTV), a model that is sustainable from the economic, social, biotic and phytosanitary perspective. It is based on an integrated model that considers the application of a participatory planning technique and of an evaluation method included among the tools of the Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation (SMCE). The results highlighted that the hypothesis 1 “cohabitation with the Citrus Tristeza virus” is the predominant hypothesis, followed at short distance by the hypothesis 2 ”total eradication and re-implantation”, while the hypothesis 3 “abandonment or extirpation” gained a marginal meaning. It was possible to assert that the hypothesis 1 was the one that presented the highest sustainability.
Bruggeman J. (2008): Social Networks – An Introduction. Routledge, Abington.
Cihelková E. (2012) Regional environmental governance: the NAFTA case. Agricultural Economiccs – Czech, 58: 454–466.
Davino Salvatore, Willemsen Anouk, Panno Stefano, Davino Mario, Catara Antonino, Elena Santiago F., Rubio Luis, Vijaykrishna Dhanasekaran (2013): Emergence and Phylodynamics of Citrus tristeza virus in Sicily, Italy. PLoS ONE, 8, e66700-
Carra G., Peri I., Scuderi A. (2014): Euro-mediterranean agricultural trade agreement: which real impact on the EU citrus production? Quality – Access to Success, 15: 111–116.
Catara A., Tessitori M. (2006): Problematiche fitosanitarie dell’agrumicoltura italiana dopo la diffusione del virus della “tristeza”. Italus Hortus, 13: 49–60.
Chinnici G., Pecorino B., Scuderi A. (2013): Enviromental and economic performance of organic citrus growing. Quality – Access to Success, 13: S1.
De Marchi B, Funtowicz S.O, Lo Cascio S, Munda G (2000): Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics, 34, 267-282
Greco Salvatore, Matarazzo Benedetto, Słowiński Roman (2010): Dominance-based Rough Set Approach to decision under uncertainty and time preference. Annals of Operations Research, 176, 41-75
FAO (2015): FAOSTAT – statistical database.
ISTAT. Annuario di Statistica, Roma.
JRC (1996): NAIADE manual and tutorial – version 1.0.ENG. Ispra site, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission.
Matarazzo B., Munda G. (2001): New approaches for the comparison of L-R fuzzy numbers: A theoretical and operational analysis . Fuzzy sets and System, 118 (3).
MORENO PEDRO, AMBRÓS SILVIA, ALBIACH-MARTÍ MARIA R., GUERRI JOSÉ, PEÑA LEANDRO (2008): Citrus tristeza virus: a pathogen that changed the course of the citrus industry. Molecular Plant Pathology, 9, 251-268
Morgan L.D. (1998): The Focus Group Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, London.
Munaretto Stefania, Siciliano Giuseppina, Turvani Margherita E. (2014): Integrating adaptive governance and participatory multicriteria methods: a framework for climate adaptation governance. Ecology and Society, 19, -
Munda G. (1995): Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment – Theory and Applications. Ecological Economics, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
Munda Giuseppe (2004): Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 662-677
Munda Giuseppe (2006): A NAIADE based approach for sustainability benchmarking. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6, 65-
Munda G. (2007): Social Multicriteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin.
Munda G., Nijkamp P., Rietveld P. (1994): Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environmental management. Ecological Economics, 10, 97-112
Munda G., Russi D. (2005): Energy policies for rural electrification: a Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation approach. Available at www. (accessed on October 4, 2014).
Munda G., Russi D. (2008): Social multicriteria evaluation of conflict over rural electrification and solar energy in Spain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26: 712 727.
Pannell David J, Glenn Nicole A (2000): A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecological Economics, 33, 135-149
Scuderi A., D’Amico M. (2015a): Evolution of development models of Italian organic citrus. Acta Horticulturae, 1065: 1877–1888.
Scuderi A., Pecorino B. (2015b): Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) Italian citrus productions. Acta Horticulturae, 1065: 1911–1918.
Scuderi A., Zarbà A.S. (2011): Economic analysis citrus fruit destined to market. Italian Journal of Food Science, Supplement: 34.
Shmelev Stanislav E., Rodríguez-Labajos Beatriz (2009): Dynamic multidimensional assessment of sustainability at the macro level: The case of Austria. Ecological Economics, 68, 2560-2573
Siciliano Giuseppina (2009): Social multicriteria evaluation of farming practices in the presence of soil degradation. A case study in Southern Tuscany, Italy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11, 1107-1133
Soderberg H., Karman E. (2003): MIKA: Methodologies for Integration of Knowledge Areas – The Case of Sustainable Urban Water Management. Department of Built Environment & Sustainable Development, Chalmers Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Goeteborg.
Sorrentino G., Davino S., Guardo M., Davino M., Caruso A. (2005): Incidence and effect of Citrus tristeza virus on commercial orchard of “Tarocco” sweet orange OL in Italy. In: Proceeding of the 16th Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists, 16: 173–178.
Stojanová H., Tomšík P. (2014): Factors influencing employment for tertiary education graduates at the selected universities. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 60: 376–387.
Stratigea Anastasia, Papadopoulou Chrysaida – Aliki (2013): Foresight Analysis at the Regional Level - A Participatory Methodological Framework. Journal of Management and Strategy, 4, -
Stratigea Anastasia, Papadopoulou Chrysaida – Aliki (2013): Foresight Analysis at the Regional Level - A Participatory Methodological Framework. Journal of Management and Strategy, 4, -
Tiwari A.P. (2007): Choice and Preference of Water Supply Institutions – An Exploratory Study of Stakeholders’ Preferences of Water Sector Reform in Metro City of Delhi, India. Available at (accessed on November 24, 2014).
Torrieri Francesca, Concilio Grazia, Nijkamp Peter (2002): Decision Support Tools for Urban Contingency Policy. A Scenario Approach to Risk Management of the Vesuvio Area in Naples, Italy. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10, 95-112
Tudisca S., Di Trapani A.M., Sgroi F., Testa R. (2014): Economic evaluation of PDO introduction in Sicilian orange farms. Quality – Access to Success, 14: 99–103.
Voogd H. (1983): Multiple Criteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning. Lion, London.
Vargas Isaza O.L. (2005): La evaluación multicriterio social y su aporte a la conservación de los bosques social multicriteria. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, Medellín, 58: 2665–2683.
Yokomi R.K. (2009): Citrus tristeza virus. In: D’Onghia A.M. (ed.), Djelouah K., Roistacher C.N.: Citrus tristeza virus and Toxoptera citricidus: a serious threat to the Mediterranean citrus industry. Bari, CIHEAM: 19–33.
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti