Agricultural competitiveness: The case of the European Union countries A., Kaminska A. (2016): Agricultural competitiveness: The case of the European Union countries  . Agric. Econ. – Czech, 62: 507-516.
download PDF
The paper assesses the competitiveness of agriculture of 27 countries of the European Union in the years 2009–2011. Due to the complexity of the phenomenon of competitiveness, a wide range of variables was adopted to evaluate it – including the relationship between the production factors, productivity, and the importance of agriculture in the international trade. Based on the evaluation criteria chosen for the competitiveness assessment and using the TOPSIS method, a synthetic measure of the studied phenomenon was constructed and then divided into four groups of countries similar in terms of the level of competitiveness of agriculture. The difference between the value of the synthetic measure of the country with the highest level of competitiveness of agriculture (Netherlands) and the country least competitive in this regard (Slovenia) was 3.5-fold. In addition to the Netherlands, there were classified also France, Germany, Denmark and Belgium in the first group, so the countries with high levels of the socio-economic development. In the second group, there were seven countries: Italy, the United Kingdom, Spain, Cyprus, Austria, Ireland and Luxembourg. Therefore, the first two groups are formed by the countries belonging to the so-called “Old 15” (except Cyprus). The last two groups are formed primarily by the countries that joined the European Union in 2004 or later.  
Arzeni A., Esposti R., Sotte F. (2001): Agriculture in transition countries and the European model of agriculture: entrepreneurship and multifunctionality. Report for the World Bank – Project “Šibenik-Knin and Zadar Counties: Framework for a Regional Development Vision”, University of Ancona.
Atkinson R.D. (2013): Competitiveness, Innovation and Productivity: Clearing up the Confusion. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. Available at
Bulgurcu Berna (Kiran) (2012): Application of TOPSIS Technique for Financial Performance Evaluation of Technology Firms in Istanbul Stock Exchange Market. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1033-1040
Chen Mei-Fang, Tzeng Gwo-Hshiung (2004): Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40, 1473-1490
Cockburn J., Siggel E., Coulibaly M., Vezina S. (1998): Measuring Competitiveness and its Sources: the Case of Mali’s Manufacturing Sector. African Economic Policy Research Report, USAID, October.
Demireli E. (2010): TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making method: an examination on state owned commercial banks in Turkey. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 5: 101–112.
EU Commission (2003): European Competitiveness Report 2003. Commission staff working document SEC(2003)1299. Available at (accessed Jan, 2015).
EU Commission (2009): European Competitiveness Report 2008. Brussels. Available at (accessed Jan, 2015).
Fuller F., Beghin J.Ch. (ed.) (2007): European Agriculture: Enlargement, Structural Change, CAP Reform and Trade Liberalization. Nova Publishers, New York.
Grega L. (2002): Price stabilization as a factor of competitiveness of agriculture. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 48: 281–284.
Hatzichronoglou T. (1996): Globalisation and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicators. OECD, STI Working papers 5. Available at (accessed Feb, 2015).
Hwang C.L., Yoon K. (1981): Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
Janic Milan (2003): Original Articles. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26, 491-512
Józwiak W. (ed.) (2012): The Improve the Position of Polish Agriculture – Preliminary Proposals. IERiGŻ, Warszawa (in Polish).
Kaminska A. (2012): The application of the tools of spatial statistics to study regional differentation of polish environment. Colloquium Biometricum, 42: 111–119.
Kołodziejczak A. (2010): Models of Spatial Differentiation of Farming Methods in Polish Agriculture. UAM, Poznań.
Korom E., Sági J. (2005): Measures of competitiveness in agriculture. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6: 375–380.
Kravčáková Vozárová I. (2013): The measurement of the competitiveness of EU agricultural production at the macroeconomic level. Exclusive Journal, Economy & Society & Environment, 1: 155–162.
Latruffe L. (2010): Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers No. 30. OECD Publishing. Available at (accessed Feb, 2015).
Hatzichronoglou T. (1996): Globalisation and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicators. OECD, STI Working papers 5. Available at (accessed Feb, 2015).
Martino G., Marchini A. (1996): The role of agriculture in developed economies: new tendencies. MEDIT, 3: 26–30.
Niezgoda D. (2009): Determinants of profitability of agricultural holdings diversified in respect of their economic size. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych – Serie G, 96: 155–165 (in Polish).
Poczta W., Fabisiak A. (2007): Changes in labour force resources in agriculture in the Central and Eastern European Countries as a result of accession to the European Union. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu – CCCLXXXV, Ekonomia, 6: 109–117.
Porter M.E. (1990): Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press, New York.
Porter M.E. (2001): Porter about the Competition. PWE, Warszawa (in Polish).
Schwab K. (ed.) (2013): The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014. World Economic Forum. Available at (accessed Feb, 2015).
Serrão A. (2003): Comparison of agricultural productivity among European countries. New Medit, 1: 14–20.
Shih Hsu-Shih, Shyur Huan-Jyh, Lee E. Stanley (2007): An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45, 801-813
Srdjevic B., Medeiros Y. D. P., Faria A. S. (2004): An Objective Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Water Management Scenarios. Water Resources Management, 18, 35-54
World Competitiveness Yearbook (2012): IMD World Competitiveness Center. Available at (accessed Feb, 2015).
Yang Taho, Chou Pohung (2005): Solving a multiresponse simulation-optimization problem with discrete variables using a multiple-attribute decision-making method. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 68, 9-21
Zawalińska K. (2004): The Competitiveness of Polish Agriculture in the Context of Integration with the European Union. Warsaw University Department of Economics, Warsaw.
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti