Estimating the social value of multifunctional agriculture (MFA) with choice experiment H. (2020): Estimating the social value of multifunctional agriculture (MFA) with choice experiment. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 66: 120-128.
download PDF

The convergence policy in agriculture, existing in many forms, has globally become one of the main concepts in agricultural development with the "sixth industrial movement" in South Korea and Japan; the multifunctional agriculture (MFA) policies proposed by van der Ploeg and Roep being good examples. The goal of this study is to test three hypotheses through the economic valuation of MFA. In the first part of the research, the importance of agricultural production activity and the core element of the rural complex were evaluated. In the second part, an assessment of three strategies of MFA and its eleven specific attributes was conducted. In the third part, the applicability of the triangular policy of van der Ploeg’s strategic frameworks of MFA was analysed.

Adamowicz W., Louviere J., Williams M. (1994): Combining revealed, stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26: 271–279.
Aguglia L., Henke R., Salvioni C. (2009): Multifunctional Agriculture. Entrepreneurial Behaviours and Strategies in the Search for Diversification. Napoli, Italy, Studi & Ricerche INEA, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
Baldock D., Beaufoy G., Bennett G. (1993): Nature Conservation and New Direction in the EC Common Agricultural Policy. London, Arnhem, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP).
Belletti G. (2002): The Socio-Economic Impact of Rural Development Policies: Realities and Potentials Project. Brussels, EU Fair CT4288.
Finocchio R., Esposti R. (2008): Determinants of farm diversification and interaction with the CAP. An application to FADN of Marche region (Italy). In: Proceedings 12th Congress of the European Association of Agriculture Economics EAAE, Ghent, Belgium, August 26–29, 2008.
Haab T.C., McConnell K.E. (2002): Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Economics of Non-Market Valuation. Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Kwon O.S, Lim Y.A., Kim W.H. (2007): Economic values of recreational water: Rafting on the Hantan River. Korean Resource Economics Association, 16: 427–451.
Kwon O.S., Yun T.Y. (2004): Amenity value of rice farming.Korea Agricultural Economics Association, 45: 235–261.
Louviere J.J., Woodworth G.G. (1993): Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: An approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research, 20: 350–367.
Menghini S., Sottini V.A, Marinelli N., Merlo B., Fabbrizzi S. (2014): Multifunctional diversification for the Italian wine producers: the state of the art in the adoption of deepening strategies. In: Proceedings 8th International Conference of Academy of Wine Business Research, Geisenheim, Germany, June 28–30, 2014.
Novikova A., Rocchi L., Vaznonis B. (2019): Valuing agricultural landscape: Lithuanian case study using a contingent valuation method. Sustainability, 2019: 2648.
OECD (2014): Economic Surveys; Korea 2014. OECD.
Renting H., Rossing W.A., Groot J.C., van der Ploeg J.D., Laurent C., Perraud D., Stobbelaar D.J., Van Ittersum M.K. (2009): Exploring multifunctional agriculture: A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 112–123.
Schimmenti E., Daddi G., Asciuto A., Borsellino V., Gesaro M., D’Acuisto M. (2016): Explorative study of multifunctional agriculture in a Sicilian inland area. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 71: 423–434.
Van der Ploeg J., Roep D. (2003): Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe. In: van Huylenbroeck G., Durand G. (eds): Multifunctional Agriculture. A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development. Hampshire, UK, Ashgate Publishing: 37–54.
Yrjola T., Kola J. (2004): Consumer preference regarding multifunctional agriculture. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 7: 78–90.
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti