Natural climatic conditions as a determinant of productivity and economic efficiency of agricultural entities
P. Adamišin, R. Kotulič, I. Kravčáková Vozárová, R. Vavrekhttps://doi.org/10.17221/153/2014-AGRICECONCitation:Adamišin P., Kotulič R., Kravčáková Vozárová I., Vavrek R. (2015): Natural climatic conditions as a determinant of productivity and economic efficiency of agricultural entities. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 61: 265-274.
The scientific contribution builds on the previous scientific studies analysing the determinants of productivity and economic efficiency of the agricultural entities and extends the knowledge of the spatial econometrics area at the NUTS IV level (at the district level) for the reporting period. The paper aimed to assess the development of productivity and economic efficiency of the agricultural entities in the reporting period based on the synthetic evaluation of the selected economic indicators by the methods of cluster analysis, and so to create a spatial map according to the regional differentiation at the NUTS IV level. On the basis of the completed analysis, we can conclude that the natural and climatic conditions have a dominant influence on the achievable productivity and economic efficiency of the agricultural entities in ensuring the sustainability of the economic performance of agriculture in different regions of Slovakia. On the basis of conducting the analysis, there were clearly defined two relatively coherent areas in Slovakia (at the district level), which are characterized by differences in the achieved production indicators and allow the regional differentiation of Slovakia into districts with more and less prosperous agricultural enterprises.Keywords:economic performance, agrarian businesses, spatial econometrics, cluster analysisReferences:
Adamišin P., Kotulič R. (2013): Evaluation of the agrarian businesses results according to their legal form. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 59: 396–402.Adams R.M. (1998): Effects of global climate change on agriculture. Inter-Research Science Center [online]. Available at http://www.int-res.com/site-service/search (accessed May 3, 2014).Alam Mahmudul, Siwar Chamhuri, Talib Basri, Jaafar Abdul Hamid (2013): Climatic change and the socioeconomic sustainability of the paddy farmers in Malaysia. Natural Science, 05, 163-166 https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2013.51A025Besharat A. (2011): The study of factors affecting productivity in the agriculture sector of Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6.Bielik P., Rajčaniová M. (2004): Competitiveness analysis of agricultural enterprises in Slovakia. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 50: 556–560.Buday Š., Vilček J. (2013): Clasification and evaluation of agricultural land in Slovakia. 1st ed. Mendel University in Brno, Brno.Bujňáková M. (2010): Competitiveness of Slovak agriculture within the V4 countries before and perspectives after the entry to the EU. In: Kotulič R., Adamišin P. (eds.): Prosperita poľnohospodárskej výroby pre zabezpečenie trvaloudrzatelneho rozvoja regiónov. PU v Prešove, Prešov, pp. 21–29.Chrastinová Z. (2012): Ekonomická efektívnosť poľnohospodárskej výroby v rozdielnych prírodných podmienkach Slovenska (The economic efficiency of agricultural production in different natural conditions in Slovakia.) Ekonomika poľnohospodárstva, 12: 15–33.Chrastinová Z., Burianová V. (2012): Economic efficiency of Slovak agriculture and its commodity sectors. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 58: 92–99.Covaci S., Sojková Z. (2006): Investigation of wheat efficiency and productivity development in Slovakia. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 52: 368–378.Dinar Ariel, Karagiannis Giannis, Tzouvelekas Vangelis (2007): Evaluating the impact of agricultural extension on farms' performance in Crete: a nonneutral stochastic frontier approach. Agricultural Economics, 36, 135-146 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00193.xDubravská M. (2013): Environmental management and its application in the Slovak Republic. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People – Romania, 2: 18–25.Emamverdi G. (2012): The study of total efficiency of agricultural productivity factors in Iran. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2: 10883–10891.Grznár M., Szabo Ľ., Jankelová N. (2009): The Agrarian Sector of the Slovak Republic after the Entry to the European Union. Ekonomický časopis, 57: 903–917.Hubbard G., O’Brien A.P. (2012): Microeconomics. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Iglesias A., Garrote L., Quiroga S., Moneo M. (2009): Impacts of climate change in agriculture in Europe. PESETA – agriculture study. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. European Commission – Joint Research Centre, Seville.Juřica A., Medonos T., Jelínek L. (2004): Structural changes and efficiency in Czech agriculture in the pre-accession period. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 50: 130–138.Kalirajan K.P., Shand R.T. (2001): Technology and farm performance: paths of productive efficiencies over time. Agricultural Economics, 24, 297-306 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00031.xKilmer R.L., Armbruster W.J. (1984): Methods for evaluating economic efficiency in agricultural marketing. Southern Journal of Agricultural economics, 16: 101–113.Kirigia J.M., Asbu E.Z. (2013): Technical and scale efficiency of public community hospitals in Eritrea: an exploratory study. Health Economic Review [online]. Available at http://www.healtheconomicsreview.com/content/3/1/6 (accessed May 3, 2014).Matejková E., Qineti A., Serenčeš R. (2008): Macroeconomic aspects of the development of Slovak regions in the post-accession period. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 54: 367–375.Olajide O.T., Akinlabi B.H., Tijani A.A. (2012): Agriculture resource and economic growth in Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 8: 103–115.Papoušek J. (2011): Evaluation of efficiency of the Common Measures – measures for land accessibility, implemented within land consolidation. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 57: 500–505.Pokrivcak J., Crombez C., Swinnen J. F. M. (2006): The status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33, 562-590 https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbl027Řezanková H., Húsek D., Snášel V. (2009): Shluková analýza dat. (Cluster analysis of data.) Profesional Publishing, Praha.Rosochatecká E. (2002): Economic efficiency of agricultural enterprises and its evaluation. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 48: 97–101.Širá E. (2013): Analysis of Slovak agricultural position from the perspective of selected indicators and Slovak regions. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 8: 230–242.Skaggs N.T., Carlson J.L. (1996): Microeconomics: Individual Choice and Its Consequences. 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishers, London.Slavík V., Grác R., Klobučník M. (2011): Spatial autocorrelation – method for defining and classifying regions in the context of socio-economic regionalization in the Slovak Republic. Sociológia, 43: 183–204.Sojková Z., Kropková Z., Benda V. (2008): Slovak agricultural farms in different regions – comparison of efficiency. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 54: 158–165.Střeleček F., Lososová J., Zdeněk R. (2011): Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2009. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 54: 103–117.Scott J. (2002): GPI Agriculture accounts, part two: Resource capacity and use: soil quality and productivity [online]. Available at http://www.gpiatlantic.org/publications/pubs.htm (accessed May 3, 2014).Wiebe Keith D. (): Linking Land Quality, Agricultural Productivity, and Food Security. SSRN Electronic Journal, , - https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.757869