Does higher food safety assurance bring higher returns? Evidence from Taiwan W., LUH Y. (2018): Does higher food safety assurance bring higher returns? Evidence from Taiwan. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 64: 477-488.
download PDF

With increasing concern of the food safety issue, consumer’s demand for certified food have induced the adoption of organic farming or traceability certification. There is, however, relatively limited research devoted to examining the determinants and economic outcomes of the two food safety assurance certifications. The major intents of this study are to analyse the determinants of the farm household’s adoption decisions of the organic and/or traceability certifications, and to investigate the economic consequences of different modes of adoption. It is found that while the log-odds of rice farmers’ choice of organic certification over the choice of none of the certifications decreases significantly with age, the educational level is positively associated with the adoption of traceability certification. The results suggest the significance of the “Straybird Program”, “One Hundred Young Farmers Counselling Program” and “The Farmers’ Academy” in promoting the adoption of food safety assurance certification. Estimated average treatment effect after correcting for the self-selection problem indicates that the adoption of the traceability certifications leads to a better economic outcome for the Fuli rice farmers, compared with the adoption of organic or both certifications. This result thereby suggests that higher food safety assurance does not necessarily bring higher returns.

Bouamra-Mechemache Zohra, Chaaban Jad (2010): Determinants of Adoption of Protected Designation of Origin Label: Evidence from the French Brie Cheese Industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 225-239
Burton Michael, Rigby Dan, Young Trevor (1999): Analysis of the Determinants of Adoption of Organic Horticultural Techniques in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50, 47-63
Chang H.H. (2012): Does the use of eco-labels affect income distribution and income inequality of aquaculture producers in Taiwan?” Ecological Economics, 80: 101–108.
Council of Agriculture of Taiwan (2017): Council of Agriculture of Taiwan. Available at (accessed March 1, 2014).
Dickinson D.L., Bailey D.V. (2002): Meat traceability: are U.S. consumers willing to pay for it? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27: 348–364.
FiBL-IFOAM Survey (2012): Key Results from the Survey on Organic Agriculture Worldwide 2012, Part 3: Organic Agriculture in the Regions 2010. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Frick, Switzerland.
Greene W. (2008): Econometric Analysis. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey.
Genius M., Pantzios C.J., Tzouvelekas V. (2006): Information acquisition and adoption of organic farming practice. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 31: 93–113.
Henson Spencer, Holt Georgina (2000): Exploring Incentives for the Adoption of Food Safety Controls: HACCP Implementation in the U.K. Dairy Sector. Review of Agricultural Economics, 22, 407-420
Hobbs J.E., Bailey D.V., Dickinson D.L., Haghiri M. (2005): Traceability in the Canadian red meat sector: do consumers care? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53: 47–65.
HUANG C. L. (1996): Consumer preferences and attitudes towards organically grown produce. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 23, 331-342
Jaenicke E.C., Demko I. (2015): Impacts from Organic Equivalency Policies: A Gravity Trade Model Analysis. Penn State University and Organic Trade Association, Pennsylvania.
Kallas Zein, Serra Teresa, Gil José Maria (2010): Farmers’ objectives as determinants of organic farming adoption: the case of Catalonian vineyard production. Agricultural Economics, 41, 409-423
Lee Lung-Fei (1983): Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity. Econometrica, 51, 507-
Liao Pei-An, Chang Hung-Hao, Chang Chun-Yen (2011): Why is the food traceability system unsuccessful in Taiwan? Empirical evidence from a national survey of fruit and vegetable farmers. Food Policy, 36, 686-693
Liberty Times (2017): Liberty Times (April 14, 2017). Liberty Times Group, Taiwan. (in Chinese)
McFadden Daniel (1974): The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 303-328
Souza Monteiro Diogo M., Caswell Julie A. (2009): Traceability adoption at the farm level: An empirical analysis of the Portuguese pear industry. Food Policy, 34, 94-101
Pietola K. S. (): Farmer response to policies promoting organic farming technologies in Finland. European Review of Agriculture Economics, 28, 1-15
Schulz Lee L., Tonsor Glynn T. (2010): Cow-Calf Producer Preferences for Voluntary Traceability Systems. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 138-162
(2011): Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption. Econometrica, 79, 159-209
Syu F., Huang P., Yang D.J. (2014): Development strategies of organic processing industries in Taiwan and other countries. Agricultural Policy and Agricultural Conditions, 269: 76–85. (in Chinese)
Taiwan Organic Information Portal (2017): Taiwan Organic Information Portal. Available at (accessed March 1, 2014).
Thompson Gary D., Kidwell Julia (1998): Explaining the Choice of Organic Produce: Cosmetic Defects, Prices, and Consumer Preferences. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 277-
Tiffin Richard, Balcombe Kelvin (2011): The determinants of technology adoption by UK farmers using Bayesian model averaging: the cases of organic production and computer usage. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55, 579-598
Tsai M.H. (2014): The determinants and economic effects of the adoption of organic farming: an example of Fuli rice farmers in Taiwan. [Master thesis] Department of Agricultural Economics, National Taiwan University, Taiwan. (in Chinese)
Uematsu H., Mishra A.K. (2012): Organic farmers or conventional farmers: where’s the money? Ecological Economics, 78: 55–62.
Yang Y.H. (2013): Analysis on the Development and management of organic agriculture in Taiwan. DGBAS Monthly, 687: 68–75. (in Chinese)
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti