Currently, technological development is driven by the search for solutions to prevent climate change and environmental degradation, increase energy efficiency, and meet societal needs in relation to avoiding conflict while navigating the implementation of current and future needs. Many of the solutions come from the rapid development of the bioeconomy. The aim of this article is to determine the impact of bioeconomy variables on economic growth in 27 EU countries. The research goal of the paper is based on the estimation of dynamic panel models using the generalized method of moments (GMM). The following set of variables used in the dynamic panel model had a positive impact on economic growth in the EU-27 countries: greenhouse gases by sector: agriculture, circular material use rate, recycling rate of packaging waste by type of packaging – plastic packaging, recycling rate of packaging waste by type of packaging – wooden packaging. Three variables were shown to have a negative impact on economic growth, namely: recycling rate of municipal waste, recycling rate of e-waste, trade-in recyclable raw materials – exports extra-EU.
Arellano M., Bond S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58: 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Baltagi B. (1995): Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester, United Kingdom, John Wiley & Sons: 130.
Bedla D., Szarek J. (2020): Bioeconomy. Social, Institutional and Production Aspects. Tyniec, Poland, Benedictine Publishing House Tyniec: 35–56.
Bracco S. (2016): The Economics of Biofuels: The Impact of EU Bioenergy Policy on Agricultural Markets and Land Grabbing in Africa. Abingdon-on-Thames, United Kingdom, Routledge: 44–84.
Bracco S., Calicioglu O., Gomez San Juan M., Flammini A. (2018): Assessing the contribution of bioeconomy to the total economy: A review of national frameworks. Sustainability, 10: 1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061698
Bugge M.M., Hansen T., Klitkou A. (2016): What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8: 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691
Dias G.M., Ayer N.W., Kariyapperuma K., Thevathasan N., Gordon A., Sidders D., Johannesson G.H. (2017): Life cycle assessment of thermal energy production from short-rotation willow biomass in Southern Ontario, Canada. Applied Energy, 204: 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.051
European Commission (2015): A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy. Brussel, Belgium, European Commission: 80.
European Commission (2018): A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection Between Economy, Society and the Environment. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union: 27–33.
European Commission (2019): The European Green Deal. Brussel, Belgium, European Commission: 640.
European Commission (2020): Employment and Social developments in Europe. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union: 7–15.
European Environment Agency (2018): The Circular Economy and the Bioeconomy. Partners in Sustainability. EEA Report No. 8/2018. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union: 49–54.
Eurostat (2021): EU Self-sufficiency for Raw Materials. [Dataset]. Eurostat. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/cei_pc010/default/table?lang=en (accessed Jan 15, 2021).
FAO (2018): Assessing the Contribution of Bioeconomy to Countries' Economy. A Brief Review of National Frameworks. Rome, Italy, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: 36–52.
Fritsche U., Brunori G., Chiaramonti D., Galanakis C., Hellweg S., Matthews R., Panoutsou C. (2020): Future Transitions for the Bioeconomy Towards Sustainable Development and a Climate-Neutral Economy – Knowledge Synthesis Final Report. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union: 89.
Havrysh V., Kalinichenko A., Mentel G., Olejarz T. (2020): Commercial biogas plants: Lessons for Ukraine. Energies, 13: 2668. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102668
Kleinschmit D., Arts B., Giurca A., Mustalahti I., Sergent A., Pülzl H. (2017): Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses. International Forestry Review, 19: 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817822407420
Kokoszka K., Sołtysik M., Szarek J. (2020): Selected aspects. In: Pink M., Wojnarowska M. (eds.): Bioeconomy. Warsaw, Poland, Difin: 87–110.
Lal R., Brevik E.C., Dawson L., Field D.J., Glaser B., Hartemink A.E., Hatano R., Lascelles B., Monger H.C., Scholten T. (2020): Managing soils for recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic. Soil Systems, 4: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4030046
Mathur S.K. (2005): Economic growth & conditional convergence: Its speed for selected regions for 1961–2001. Indian Economic Review, 40: 185–208.
McCormick K., Kautto N. (2013): The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability, 5: 2589–2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589
Muradin M., Kulczycka J. (2020): The identification of hotspots in the bioenergy production chain. Energies, 13: 5757. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215757
Pyka A., Prettner K. (2018): Economic growth, development, and innovation: The transformation towards a knowledge-based bioeconomy. In: Lewandowski I. (ed.): Bioeconomy: Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy. Cham, Switzerland, Springer: 332–341.
Ronzon T., Piotrowski S., Tamosiunas S., Dammer L., Carus M., M'barek R. (2020): Developments of economic growth and employment in bioeconomy sectors across the EU. Sustainability, 12: 4507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114507
Sefeedpari P., Pudełko R., Jędrejek A., Kozak M., Borzęcka M. (2020): To what extent is manure produced, distributed, and potentially available for bioenergy? A step toward stimulating circular bio-economy in Poland. Energies, 13: 6266. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236266
Solow R. (1956): A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70: 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
Yin L., Zestos G., Michelis L. (2003): Economic convergence in the European Union. Journal of Economic Integration, 18: 188–213. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2003.18.1.188