The relationships between productivity, operational risk, and firm performance

https://doi.org/10.17221/222/2021-AGRICECONCitation:

Chou C.H., Lee J.M., Teng Y.M., Lee H.L. (2022): The relationships between productivity, operational risk, and firm performance. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 68: 97–106.

download PDF

The aim of this study was to revisit the relationship between productivity and performance by using the panel data model on Taiwanese food listed firms during 2008–2020. The result found that there is a U-shaped relationship between productivity and performance. On the contrary, research and development (R&D) innovation and performance have an inverse U-shaped relationship, reminding that when the food listed firms have a specific R&D innovation base, they should invest more powerful resources, professional productivity, and innovate the food listed firms.

References:
Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. (2018): The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108: 1488–1542. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696
 
Arkolakis C., Ramondo N., Rodríguez-Clare A., Yeaple S. (2018): Innovation and production in the global economy. American Economic Review, 108: 2128–73. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141743
 
Bendickson J., Gur F.A., Taylor E.C. (2018): Reducing environmental uncertainty: How high performance work systems moderate the resource dependence-firm performance relationship. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 35: 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1412
 
Bettis R.A., Mahajan V. (1985): Risk/return performance of diversified firms. Management Science, 31: 785–799. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.7.785
 
Bloom M., Milkovich G.T. (1998): Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 283–297.
 
Chen J., Heng C.S., Tan B.C., Lin Z. (2018): The distinct signaling effects of R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China. Research Policy, 47: 108–120.
 
Dai X., Cheng L. (2018): The impact of product innovation on firm-level markup and productivity: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 50: 4570–4581. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1458195
 
Duncan R.B. (1972): Characteristics of perceived environment and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 313–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145
 
Esteve-Pérez S., Pieri F., Rodriguez D. (2018): Age and productivity as determinants of firm survival over the industry life cycle. Industry and Innovation, 25: 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1291329
 
Liu Y. (2018): The upward trend in the volatility of firm productivity shocks. Economics Letters, 163: 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.11.027
 
Glaeser S., Michels J., Verrecchia R.E. (2020): Discretionary disclosure and manager horizon: Evidence from patenting. Review of Accounting Studies, 25: 597–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-019-09520-0
 
Golec J.H., Vernon J.A. (2007): Financial Risk in the Biotechnology Industry. Working Paper No. 13604. Cambridge, US, National Bureau of Economic Research: 1–27.
 
Gonzalez A., Teräsvirta T., van Dijk D.V. (2005): Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 604. Stockholm School of Economics (SSE)/The Economic Research Institute (EFI): 165.
 
Kren L., Kerr J.L. (1993). The effect of behaviour monitoring and uncertainty on the use of performance-contingent compensation. Accounting and Business Research, 23: 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1993.9729873
 
Montani F., Vandenberghe C., Khedhaouria A., Courcy F. (2019): Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness. Human Relations, 73: 59–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718819055
 
Patel P., Pavitt K. (1995): Technological Competencies in the World's Largest Firms: Characteristics, Constraints and Scope for Managerial Choice. Laxenburg, Austria, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA): 32.
 
Pedersen E.R.G., Gwozdz W., Hvass K.K. (2018): Exploring the relationship between business model innovation, corporate sustainability, and organisational values within the fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 149: 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3044-7
 
Priem R.L., Rasheed A.M., Kotulic A.G. (1995): Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance. Journal of Management, 21: 913–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100506
 
TEJ (2020): Listed Company Financial Database. [Dataset]. Taiwan Economic Journal Co., Ltd. Available at https://www.tej.com.tw/tejmon/html/f2/f2_default.htm (accessed Apr 20, 2021).
 
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti