The coherence of common policies of the EU in territorial cohesion: A never-ending discourse? A reviewš O., Kukoč M., Jež Rogelj M. (2019): The coherence of common policies of the EU in territorial cohesion: A never-ending discourse? A review. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 65: 143-149.
download PDF

The measures of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and Regional (Cohesion) Policy are aimed at achieving cohesion, i.e. reducing the economic (sectoral), social and territorial disparities at European Union level. The issue of rural areas has become an important part of the CAP measures in Pillar 2. Since the CAP does not have a primarily territorial orientation, it does not contribute to territorial cohesion of rural areas. In a similar vein, regional policy, which is primarily oriented towards territorial development, also failed to give rise to complete, balanced development. Using qualitative analysis, this article summarises references selected on the basis of the authors’ experience in policy issues. The types of discourse included on the subject of coherence of common policies are the role of agricultural, rural and regional policy in cohesion and the conflict of cohesion and competitiveness objectives. Modern political and economic efforts of converging competitiveness into the macro concept with spatial implication result in planning and implementation of inappropriate measures and instruments intended to encourage the balanced territorial development of the EU. From this arises a conflict of cohesion and competitiveness, coupled with long-term consequences for the most vulnerable areas.

Becker Sascha O., Egger Peter H., von Ehrlich Maximilian (2010): Going NUTS: The effect of EU Structural Funds on regional performance. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 578-590
Begg Iain (2010): Cohesion or Confusion: A Policy Searching for Objectives. Journal of European Integration, 32, 77-96
Bivand Roger, Brunstad Rolf (2006): Regional growth in Western Europe: detecting spatial misspecification using the R environment. Papers in Regional Science, 85, 277-297
Bristow Gillian (2005): Everyone's a ‘winner’: problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness. Journal of Economic Geography, 5, 285-304
Cappelen Aadne, Castellacci Fulvio, Fagerberg Jan, Verspagen Bart (2003): The Impact of EU Regional Support on Growth and Convergence in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, 621-644
Crescenzi Riccardo, De Filippis Fabrizio, Pierangeli Fabio (2013): In Tandem for Cohesion? Synergies and Conflicts between Regional and Agricultural Policies of the European Union. Regional Studies, 49, 681-704
Esposti R. (2007): Regional growth and policies in the European Union: Does the Common Agricultural Policy have a counter-treatment effect? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89: 116–134.
Fainstein Susan S. (2001): Competitiveness, Cohesion, and Governance: Their Implications for Social Justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 884-888
Fritz Martin, Koch Max (2014): Potentials for prosperity without growth: Ecological sustainability, social inclusion and the quality of life in 38 countries. Ecological Economics, 108, 191-199
Gagliardi L., Percoco M. (2016): The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions. Regional Studies, 857–868.
Giordano Benito, Dubois Alexandre (2018): Combining territory and competitiveness in EU Regional Policy? Analyzing ERDF investment profiles in regions with specific geographical features. Regional Studies, , 1-10
Hansen Heiko, Herrmann Roland (2012): The two dimensions of policy impacts on economic cohesion: Concept and illustration for the CAP. Food Policy, 37, 483-491
Jovančević R., Globan T., Recher V. (2015): Does the Cohesion Policy decrease economic inequalities in the European Union? Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 18: 1–20.
Krugman Paul (1994): Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73, 28-
Michalewska-Pawlak Malgorzata (2011): Rural areas development in Europe as a field of EU Cohesion Policy intervention after 2013. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 113, 161-166
Mancha-Navarro T., Garrido-Yserte R. (2008): Regional policy in the European Union: The cohesion-competitiveness dilemma. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 1: 47–66.
Pellegrini Guido, Terribile Flavia, Tarola Ornella, Muccigrosso Teo, Busillo Federica (2013): Measuring the effects of European Regional Policy on economic growth: A regression discontinuity approach. Papers in Regional Science, 92, 217-233
Porter M.E., Ketels C., Miller K., Bryden T.R. (2004): Competitiveness in Rural U.S. Regions: Learning and Research Agenda. U.S. Economic Development Administration. Available at (accessed June 10, 2018).
Sala-i-Martin Xavier X. (1996): Regional cohesion: evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40, 1325-1352
Sharp M. (1998): Competitiveness and cohesion – are the two compatible? Research Policy, 27: 569–588.
Shortall Sally, Warner Mildred E. (2010): Social Inclusion or Market Competitiveness? A Comparison of Rural Development Policies in the European Union and the United States. Social Policy & Administration, 44, 575-597
Shucksmith M., Thomson K., Roberts D. (2005): The CAP and the Regions: The Territorial Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy. 1st Ed. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
Tarditi S., Zanias G. (2001): Common Agricultural Policy. In: Hall R., Smith A., Tsoukalis I. (eds): Competitiveness and Cohesion in EU Policies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wegener M. (2008): Competitiveness or cohesion? A phase strategy of European spatial development. In: Komornicki T. (ed.): Territorial Dilemmas of Socio-economic Development in Europe Europa XXI 18. Stanisław Leszczycki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, PAS, Warszawa.
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti