An empirical analysis of the determinants of agricultural official development assistance S., Lim S.S. (2018): An empirical analysis of the determinants of agricultural official development assistance. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 64: 206-215.
download PDF

The aim of this study was to analyse the determining factors of official development assistance (ODA) provided to the agricultural and food sectors. Lack of empirical research on this type of ODA makes this study stand out from the sea of qualitative approaches. By analysing the agricultural sectors and the views of aid recipient countries, this paper provides evidence-based explanations for the aid flows between donor and recipient countries. Using disbursement ODA data covering 141 countries over 2002–2012, we devise and estimate a gravity model. Heckman’s two-step approach is adopted to address a potential bias arising from the selection of aid recipient countries. The estimated results confirm that agricultural aid is mainly governed by the needs of the recipient countries with regard to factors such as undernourishment and food inadequacy rates, depth of food deficits and political circumstances. As expected, the results indicate that food aid is influenced mostly by humanitarian factors.


Alesina A., Dollar D. (2000): Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5: 33–63.
Anderson J.E. (1979): A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69: 106–116.
Anderson James E, van Wincoop Eric (2003): Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 93, 170-192
Baier Scott L., Bergstrand Jeffrey H. (2009): Bonus vetus OLS: A simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation. Journal of International Economics, 77, 77-85
Berthélemy J.C. (2006): Bilateral donors’ interest vs. recipients’ development motives in aid allocation: Do all donors behave the same? Review of Development Economics,10: 179–194.
Berthélemy Jean-Claude, Tichit Ariane (2004): Bilateral donors' aid allocation decisions—a three-dimensional panel analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 13, 253-274
Burnside Craig, Dollar David (2000): Aid, Policies, and Growth. American Economic Review, 90, 847-868
Canavari M., Cantore N. (2010): Equivalence of organic standards as a signal of affinity: A gravity model of Italian agricultural trade. International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 22: 314–327.
Conteh-Morgan E. (1990): American Foreign Aid and Global Power Projection: The Geopolitics of Resource Allocation. Dartmouth Publishing Company, Brookfield, VT.
Cooray N., Shahiduzzaman M. (2004): Determinants of Japanese aid allocation: An econometric analysis. IUJ Research Institute Working Paper No. 2004-4.
Díaz-Bonilla E., Ron J.F. (2010): Food security, price volatility and trade. ICTSD Issue Paper No. 27, Geneva
Feenstra R.C. (2003): Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
FAO (2012): The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2012. FAO, Rome.
Ghosh Sucharita, Yamarik Steven (2004): Does trade creation measure up? A reexamination of the effects of regional trading arrangements. Economics Letters, 82, 213-219
Gounder R., Sen K. (1999): What motivates foreign aid: a case study of Australia’s aid to Indonesia. Journal of Developing Areas, 33: 379–394.
Haq Z., Mejlke K., Cranfield J. (2012): Selection bias in a gravity model of agrifood trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40: 1–30.
Head K., Mayer T. (2014): Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cook-book. In: Gopinath G., Helpman E., Rogoff K. (es): Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 4, Elservier Ltd., Oxford.
Heckman James J. (1979): Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47, 153-
Hook S.W. (1995): National Interest and Foreign Aid. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO.
Kim D.B. (2009): Ceasing growth that focused on a few countries. ODA Watch Letter, 32 (in Korean).
Kim S.T., Yoon J.W., Kim Y.G. (2013): An empirical study on determining factors in selecting priority ODA countries. Journal of Government Studies, 19: 125–153. (in Korean)
Lebovic James H. (2016): National Interests and US Foreign Aid: The Carter and Reagan Years. Journal of Peace Research, 25, 115-135
Lebovic James H. (2016): Donor Positioning: Development Assistance from the U.S., Japan, France, Germany, and Britain. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 119-126
Lee J.W. (2005): An analysis of determining factors for resource allocation in Korea’s Official Development Assistance. Exim Overseas Economics Review, 10. (in Korean)
Lumsdaine D.H. (1993): Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Maizels Alfred, Nissanke Machiko K. (1984): Motivations for aid to developing countries. World Development, 12, 879-900
McGillivray Mark, Oczkowski Edward (2006): A two-part sample selection model of British bilateral foreign aid allocation. Applied Economics, 24, 1311-1319
McKinlay R. D., Little R. (1977): A Foreign Policy Model of U.S. Bilateral Aid Allocation. World Politics, 30, 58-86
Melitz Jacques (2007): North, South and distance in the gravity model. European Economic Review, 51, 971-991
Neumayer Eric (2003): The Determinants of Aid Allocation by Regional Multilateral Development Banks and United Nations Agencies. International Studies Quarterly, 47, 101-122
Nkamleu G.B., Gokowski J., Kazianga H. (2003): Explaining the failure of agricultural production in sub-Saharan Africa. In: 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists (IAAE), Durban,Aug. 16–22, 2003.
Park B.Y. (2011): A methodology for selection of priority recipient country in foreign aid. Korea Development Economics Association, 17: 1–32 (in Korean).
Poe Steven C. (1992): Human Rights and Economic Aid Allocation under Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 147-
Schraeder Peter J., Hook Steven W., Taylor Bruce (1998): Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows. World Politics, 50, 294-323
Silva Simone Juhasz, Nelson Douglas (2012): Does Aid Cause Trade? Evidence from an Asymmetric Gravity Model. The World Economy, 35, 545-577
UN (2014): The Millennium Development Goals Report 2014. United Nations, New York.
Williams Michael C. (1996): Hobbes and international relations: a reconsideration. International Organization, 50, 213-
World Bank (2015): World Development Indicators 2015. World Bank Publications.
Zhou Min (2011): Intensification of geo-cultural homophily in global trade: Evidence from the gravity model. Social Science Research, 40, 193-209
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti