Interplay between environmental, social and governance coordinates and the financial performance of agricultural companies

Pirtea M.G., Noja G.G., Cristea M., Panait M. (2021): Interplay between environmental, social and governance coordinates and the financial performance of agricultural companies. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 67: 479–490

supplementary materialdownload PDF

On the complex framing of the agricultural fields, related to the corporate social responsibility (CSR), the general objective of this paper is to assess the impacts of environmental, social and governance (ESG) credentials of CSR and human capital features on the financial performance of agricultural companies. The data consists of a sample of 412 public companies from the Thomson Reuters Eikon database, with data for 2020, operating in 17 agricultural areas with headquarters allocated around the world. The methodological endeavor embeds two econometric procedures, multifactorial models of robust regression and structural equation modelling (SEM). The research results bring new evidence to underline the risks related to the sustainability of the financial performance of agricultural companies and the decisive role played by the ESG dimensions to counteract these risks, particularly by the environmental pillar, along with CSR specific strategies and human capital characteristics (management board and employees). We propose several strategies for companies operating in agricultural fields in order to enhance profitability by CSR measures.

Andrei J.V., Ion A.R., Popescu G.H., Nica E., Zaharia M. (2016): Implications of agricultural bioenergy crop production and prices in changing the land use paradigm – The case of Romania. Land Use Policy, 50: 399–407.
Boffo R., Marshall C., Patalano R. (2020): ESG Investing: Environmental Pillar Scoring and Reporting. OECD Paris. Available at (accessed July 22, 2021).
Brzozowska A., Bubel D., Kalinichenko A., Nekrasenko L. (2017): Transformation of the agricultural financial system in the age of globalisation. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 63: 548–558.
Buallay A. (2021): Sustainability reporting and agriculture industries' performance: Worldwide evidence. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies (in press).
European Commission (2011): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Available at (accessed July 20, 2021).
Florea N.M., Bădîrcea R.M., Pîrvu R.C., Manta A.G., Doran M.D., Jianu E. (2020): The impact of agriculture and renewable energy on climate change in Central and East European countries. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 66: 444–457.
Grófová Š., Srnec K. (2012): Food crisis, food production and poverty. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 58: 119–126.
Ika S.R., Akbar F.A., Puspitasari D., Sumbodo, B.T., Widagdo A.K. (2021). Corporate social responsibility reporting of agriculture companies: Evidence from Indonesia. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, International Conference on Sustainable Utilization of Natural Resources (Vol. 800, No. 1), Indonesia, Nov 28, 2020: 1–7.
Jeníček V. (2010): World population – Development, transition. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 56: 1–15.
Khan S.A.R., Yu Z., Panait M., Janjua L.R., Shah A. (2021): Global Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives for Reluctant Businesses. Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA, IGI Global: 25–146.
Knežević G., Pavlović V., Bojičić R. (2017): Does the board gender diversity impact financial performance in agriculture? Case of Serbian agriculture companies listed on Stock Exchange. Custos e Agronegocio, 13: 2–20.
Levkivska L., Levkovych I. (2017): Social responsibility in Ukrainian agriculture: The regional issue. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 8: 97–114.
Moreno-Moreno J., Velasco Morente F., Sanz Díaz M.T. (2018): Assessment of the operational and environmental efficiency of agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 64: 74–88.
Panait M., Erokhin V., Andrei J.V., Gao T. (2020): Implication of TNCs in agri-food sector: Challenges, constraints and limits: Profit or CSR? Strategic Management, 25: 33–43.
Resmi S.I., Begum N.N., Hassan, M.M. (2018): Impact of CSR on firm's financial performance: A study on some selected agribusiness industries of Bangladesh. American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 4: 74–85.
Roudaki J. (2018): Corporate governance structures and firm performance in large agriculture companies in New Zealand. Corporate Governance, 18: 987–1006.
Simpson, J.R., Montgomery, D. (1998): A performance-based assessment of robust regression methods. Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation, 27: 1031–1049.
Song A.K. (2019). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem – A critique and reconfiguration. Small Business Economics, 53: 569–590.
Subić J., Jeločnik M. (2018): Economic-energetic parameters of biomethane production from the agricultural plant biomass. In: Thematic Proceedings, Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in Terms of the Republic of Serbia Strategic Goals Realization within the Danube Region: Support Programs for the Improvement of Agricultural and Rural Development, Serbia, Dec 14–15, 2017: 300–317.
Thomson Reuters (2021): 2020 Eikon. [Dataset]. Thomson Reuters. Available at (accessed May 20, 2021).
Tomchuk O., Lepetan I., Zdyrko N., Vasa L. (2018): Environmental activities of agricultural enterprises: Accounting and analytical support. Economic Annals-XXI, 169: 77–83.
Udayasankar K. (2008): Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 167–175.
Vrabcová P., Urbancová H. (2021): Approaches of selected organisations in the Czech Republic to promoting the concept of sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 67: 255–265.
Yuan K.-H., Lu L. (2008): SEM with missing data and unknown population using two-stage ML: Theory and its application. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 62: 621–652.
supplementary materialdownload PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti