The impact of the biogas industry on agricultural sector in Germany
Z. Lajdova, J. Lajda, P. Bielikhttps://doi.org/10.17221/292/2015-AGRICECONCitation:Lajdova Z., Lajda J., Bielik P. (2016): The impact of the biogas industry on agricultural sector in Germany. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 62: 1-8.
The whole concept of the biogas industry is an ongoing issue particularly because of its differences from the original purpose and the criticism about causing too many externalities. Its high costs and low efficiency compared to the traditional cheaper sources belong to the main problems. This issue is serious especially currently – at the times of a slow economic growth when a switch to renewable energy sources means yet another harm to the competitiveness of the EU producers as it increases their production costs. Another weak point is that the silage maize as the most common input material for the anaerobic digestion leads to the displacement of the food crops production and it is considered to be also a contributor to the food price increase. Biogas plants also compete for input with the livestock production that ends up in the biogas plants instead of e.g. feeding cows. The aim of the paper is to investigate the long-run relationship between the biogas industry and the agricultural sector in Germany – a leader in the technology with the most developed biogas sector among the European Union member states. The econometric analysis based on the Vector Correction Model confirms the stated assumptions and concludes that the production of biogas via the anaerobic digestion has a significant impact on agriculture in Germany.Keywords:agriculture, anaerobic digestion, biogas plnats, VECMReferences:
Aga A.K. (2014): The impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth: a case study of Turkey 1980–2012. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6: 71–84.BEKHET HUSSAIN A., Yusop Nora Yusma Mohamed (2009): Assessing the Relationship between Oil Prices, Energy Consumption and Macroeconomic Performance in Malaysia: Co-integration and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) Approach. International Business Research, 2, - https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v2n3p152Britz Wolfgang, Delzeit Ruth (2013): The impact of German biogas production on European and global agricultural markets, land use and the environment. Energy Policy, 62, 1268-1275 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.123Bruns E., Ohlhorst D., Wenzel B., Koppel J. (2009): Renewable Energies in Germany`s Electricity Market. A Biography of the Innovation Process. Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin.Dach J. et al. (2014): The economic efficiency of maize straw usage as a co-substrate for biogas production. In: Biogas Science 2014, International Conference on Anaerobic Digestion, Oct 26–30, 2014, Vienna, Austria.Delzeit R., Britz W., Kreins P. (2012): An Economic Assessment of Biogas Production and Land Use under the German Renewable Energy Source Act. Kiel Working Paper No. 1767, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Germany. Available at https://www.ifw-members.ifw-kiel.de/publications/an-economic-assessment-of-biogas-production-and-land-use-under-the-german-renewable-energy-source-act-2/KWP_Delzeit_Britz.pdf (accessed September 2015).Delzeit R., Gömann H., Holm-Müller K., Kreins P., Bettina Kretschmer, Münch J., Peterson S. (2010): Analysing Bioenergy and Land Use Competition in a Coupled Modelling System: The Role of Bioenergy in Renewable Energy Policy in Germany. Kiel Working Paper No. 1653, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Germany. Available at https://www.ifw-members.ifw-kiel.de/publications/analysing-bioenergy-and-land-use-competition-in-a-coupled-modelling-system-the-role-of-bioenergy-in-renewable-energy-policy-in-germany/kwp-1653.pdf (accessed September 2015).Emmann C.H., Guenther-Lubbers W., Theuvsen L. (2013): Impacts of biogas production on the production factors land and labour – current effects, possible consequences and further research needs. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 4: 38–50.Fachverband Biogas e.V. (German Biogas Association and Food.) Available at http://www.biogas.org (accessed August 2015).Fenton N., Neil M. (2012): Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT). Available at http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E (accessed August 2015).Fuchs C., Bogatov V., Eimannsberger J. (2011): Competitiveness and risk of crop production, milk production and biogas production with respect to regional resources. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 1: 939–949.Herrmann A. (2013): Biogas Production from Maize: Current State, Challenges and Prospects. 2. Agronomic and Environmental Aspects. BioEnergy Research, 6, 372-387 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9227-xKapounek S., Kralova J. (2014): Financial Instability and Money Velocity: Evidence from the Financial Crisis. MENDELU Working Papers in Business and Economics 44/2014. Mendel University in Brno. Available at http://ftp.mendelu.cz/RePEc/men/wpaper/44_2014.pdf (accessed September 2015).Kapusuzoglu A., Karacaer Ulusoy M. (): The interactions between agricultural commodity and oil prices: an empirical analysis. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 61, 410-421 https://doi.org/10.17221/231/2014-AGRICECONKlawitter N. (2012): Corn-mania: Biogas Boom in Germany Leads to Modern-Day Land Grab. Spiegel Online International. Available at http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/biogas-subsidies-in-germany-lead-to-modern-day-land-grab-a-852575.html (accessed September 2015).Kočenda E., Černý A. (2014): Elements of Time Series Econometrics: An Applied Approach. Karolinum Press. Charles University in Prague.Lang M., Lang A. (2014): German Feed-in-Tariffs 2014 (from 08). German Energy Blog. Available at http://www.germanenergyblog.de/?page_id=16379 (accessed September 2015).Mukhtar T., Rasheed S. (2010): Testing long-run relationship between exports and imports: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 31: 41–58.Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R. A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., Tokgoz S., Hayes D., Yu T.-H. (2008): Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change. Science, 319, 1238-1240 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151861Schmitz M., Moleva P. (2013): Determinants for Level and Volatility of Agricultural Commodity Prices on International Markets – are Biofuels Responsible for Price Volatility and Food Insecurity? Institute for Agricultural Policy and Market Research and Center for International Development and Environmental Research, Justus Leibig University Giessen. Available at http://www.biokraftstoffverband.de/tl_files/download/Stellungnahmen_und_Studien/14-04-09-Studie%20Schmitz%20engl%20-%20VDB%20Ufop.pdf (accessed September 2015).Schreiber Sven (2012): Estimating the natural rate of unemployment in euro-area countries with co-integrated systems. Applied Economics, 44, 1315-1335 https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.539548Schwarz G., Noe E., Saggau V. (2012): Comparison of bioenergy policies in Germany and Denmark. Research in Rural Sociology and Development, 18: 235–262.Sjo B. (2008): Testing for Unit Roots and Cointegration. Linköping University, Sweden. Available at https://www.iei.liu.se/nek/ekonometrisk-teori-7-5-hp-730a07/labbar/1.233753/dfdistab7b.pdf (accessed September 2015).SRU (German Advisory Council on the Environment) (2007): Climate Change Mitigation by Biomass, Special Report. Available at http://eeac.hscglab.nl/files/D-SRU_ClimateChangeBiomass_Jul07.pdf (accessed September 2015).von Vitzke H., Noleppa S., Schwarz G. (2009): World food security and global warming. Farm Policy Journal, 6: 59–69.Wiesenthal Tobias, Leduc Guillaume, Christidis Panayotis, Schade Burkhard, Pelkmans Luc, Govaerts Leen, Georgopoulos Panagiotis (2009): Biofuel support policies in Europe: Lessons learnt for the long way ahead. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 789-800 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.011