What drives the rapid achievement of a funding target in crowdfunding? Evidence from China

https://doi.org/10.17221/319/2019-AGRICECONCitation:Li Y., Du J. (2020): What drives the rapid achievement of a funding target in crowdfunding? Evidence from China. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 66: 269-277.
supplementary materialdownload PDF

As a novel financing mechanism, crowdfunding can raise funds provided by many people for entrepreneurs in various industries, including the agri-food industry. Achieving a funding target in the shortest time possible is a key concern. Based on customer delivered value theory, we constructed a research model to empirically study the factors hastening the achievement of a funding target using large samples (N = 1 138). The indicators reflecting product value and image value were found to have significant positive impacts on the rapid achievement of the funding target; the indicators reflecting person value and service value also impacted the quick achievement of the funding target. Moreover, the results showed that the indicator reflecting monetary value, the minimum investment amount, has a positive impact on the rapid achievement of the funding target. The number of comments plays a mediating role in the relationship between the indicators reflecting the customer delivered value and the quick achievement of the funding target. Finally, practical implications of this study for initiators, platforms, and regulators are discussed.

References:
Ahlers G.K., Cumming D., Günther C., Schweizer D. (2015): Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39: 955–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
 
Agrawal A., Catalini C., Goldfarb A. (2015): Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24: 253–274.
 
Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. (1986): The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
 
Belleflamme P., Lambert T., Schwienbacher A. (2014): Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29: 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
 
Boeuf B., Darveau J., Legoux R. (2014): Financing creativity: Crowdfunding as a new approach for theatre projects. International Journal of Arts Management, 16: 33–48.
 
Colombo M.G., Franzoni C., Rossi-Lamastra C. (2015): Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39: 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12118
 
Courtney C., Dutta S., Li Y. (2017): Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41: 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
 
Crowdfunding Net (2019): Crowdfunding Net Statistics. [Dataset]. Available at www.Zhongchou.cn
 
Frydrych D., Bock A.J., Kinder T., Koeck B. (2014): Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 16: 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2014.916512
 
Lambert T., Schwienbacher A. (2010): An empirical analysis of crowdfunding. Social Science Research Network, 1578175: 1–23.
 
Liu S.S., Wang C.J. (2011): Optimising project selection and scheduling problems with time-dependent resource constraints. Automation in Construction, 20: 1110–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.012
 
McKnight D.H., Choudhury V., Kacmar C. (2002): Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13: 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
 
Mollick E. (2014): The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
 
Ordanini A., Miceli L., Pizzetti M., Parasuraman A. (2011): Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22: 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155079
 
Wang N., Li Q., Liang H., Ye T., Ge S. (2018): Understanding the importance of interaction between creators and backers in crowdfunding success. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 27: 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2017.12.004
 
Xie K. Liu Z., Chen L., Zhang W., Liu S., Chaudhry S.S. (2019): Success factors and complex dynamics of crowdfunding: An empirical research on Taobao platform in China. Electronic Markets, 29: 187–199.
 
Yang J., Liu L., Yin C. (2019): A non-liner decision model for green crowdfunding project success: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16: 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020187
 
Zhao Q., Chen C.D. Wang J.L., Chen P.C. (2017): Determinants of backers’ funding intention in crowdfunding: Social exchange theory and regulatory focus. Telematics and Informatics, 34: 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.006
 
Zhang J., Liu P. (2012): Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Science, 58: 892–912. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1459
 
Zhang W., Yan X., Chen Y. (2017): Configurational path to financing performance of crowdfunding projects using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Engineering Economics, 28: 25–34. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.28.1.15422
 
Zheng H., Li D., Wu J., Xu Y. (2014): The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Information & Management, 51: 488–496.
 
supplementary materialdownload PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences