Effects of the investment support in the Czech meat processing industry  

https://doi.org/10.17221/367/2015-AGRICECONCitation:Spicka J., Naglova Z., Gurtler M. (2017): Effects of the investment support in the Czech meat processing industry  . Agric. Econ. – Czech, 63: 356-369.
download PDF

The goal of the paper is to quantify and evaluate the effects of investment subsidies in the Czech meat processing industry. The investment subsidies should enhance the economic results of the supported companies and increase their competitiveness. The analysis is based on the fixed-effect modelling of balanced panel data of 130 meat processors in the period 2008–2013. It quantifies the impact of investment subsidies from the Rural Development Programme (RDP) and the national support programme (Decree of MoA) on profitability, labour productivity, credit debt ratio and the efficiency of production consumption. The conclusions can be generalized for medium-sized and large companies. The results show that investment subsidies from the RDP had not such a significant effect as expected. Investment subsidies from the RDP affected only the labour productivity of large meat processors and the ROA of non-family companies. However, they should preferably help small and medium-sized companies to be more competitive. Subsidies from the national programme increased the profitability of family-owned and medium-sized companies and changed the capital structure of the supported companies which used more bank loans for upgrading the technology.  

References:
Aghion Philippe, Howitt Peter (1992): A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-  https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
 
Anderson R., Reeb D. (2003): Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58: 1301–1328.
 
Arellano M. (2003): Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
Arellano M., Bond S. (1991): Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, The Review of Economic Studies, 58: 277–297.
 
Ankarhem Mattias (2010): Do Regional Investment Grants Improve Firm Performance? Evidence from Sweden. Technology and Investment, 01, 221-227  https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2010.13027
 
Baltagi B.H. (2008): Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
 
Bascou P., Londero P., Munch W. (2006): Policy reform and adjustment in the European Union: Changes in the CAP and enlargement. In: Blandford D., Hill B. (eds): Policy Reform and Adjustment in the Agricultural Sectors of Developed Countries. CABI, Wallingford.
 
Bergström F. (2000): Capital subsidies and the performance of firms. Small Business Economics, 14: 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008133217594
 
Bernini Cristina, Pellegrini Guido (2011): How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41, 253-265  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.01.005
 
Božík M. (2012): Impacts assessment of the agroenvironmental support in the Rural Development Programme 2007–2013 at the farm level. Economic of Agriculture, 1: 34–46.
 
Caliendo Marco, Kopeinig Sabine (2008): SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31-72  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
 
Čechura L., Šobrová L. (2008): The price transmission in pork meat agri-food chain. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 54: 77–84.
 
Cesaratto S., Stirati A. (1996): The Economic Consequences of Innovation in Italian Manufacturing Firms: Theory and Results from the Community Innovation Survey. WP 40, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
 
Chen H.T. (1990): Theory-driven Evaluations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
 
Chow Gregory C. (1960): Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions. Econometrica, 28, 591-  https://doi.org/10.2307/1910133
 
Coad Alex, Rao Rekha (2008): Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37, 633-648  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.003
 
Delmar F. (1997): Measuring growth: methodological considerations and empirical results. In: Donckels R., Miettinen A. (eds): Entrepreneurship and SME Research: On the Way to the Next Millennium. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot.
 
Craig Justin, Dibrell Clay (2006): The Natural Environment, Innovation, and Firm Performance: A Comparative Study. Family Business Review, 19, 275-288  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00075.x
 
European Commission (2012): Ex-post Evaluations of Rural Development Programmes 2000–2006, Kantor. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels.
 
European Commission (2014): Investment Support under Rural Development Policy. Final Report. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels.
 
Freel M.S. (2000): Do small innovating firms outperform non innovators? Small Business Economics, 14: 195–210.
 
Geroski P. A. (2005): Understanding the implications of empirical work on corporate growth rates. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26, 129-138  https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1207
 
Geroski P.A., Machin S. (1992): Do innovating firms outperform non-innovators? Business Strategy Review, 3: 79–90.
 
Gohin A., Latruffe L. (2006): The Luxembourg Common Agricultural Policy reform and the European food industries: What’s at stake? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54: 175–194.
 
Greene W.H. (2000): Econometric Analysis. Pearson Education, Harlow.
 
Habbershon Timothy G., Williams Mary L. (1999): A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x
 
Hanley Nick, Whitby Martin, Simpson Ian (1999): Assessing the success of agri-environmental policy in the UK. Land Use Policy, 16, 67-80  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(98)00041-6
 
Harris R. (1991): Regional Economic Policy in Northern Ireland 1945–1988. Aldershot, Avebury.
 
Harris Richard, Robinson Catherine (2004): INDUSTRIAL POLICY IN GREAT BRITAIN AND ITS EFFECT ON TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY IN MANUFACTURING PLANTS, 1990-1998. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51, 528-543  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00319.x
 
Harris Richard, Trainor Mary (2005): Capital Subsidies and their Impact on Total Factor Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence from Northern Ireland*. Journal of Regional Science, 45, 49-74  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00364.x
 
Harrison Rupert, Jaumandreu Jordi, Mairesse Jacques, Peters Bettina (2014): Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 35, 29-43  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.06.001
 
Harvey D.R. (1990): Agricultural sector modelling for policy development. In: Jones J.G.W., Street P.R. (eds): Systems Theory Applied to Agriculture and the Food Chain. Elsevier, London.
 
Hay Michael, Kamshad Kimya (1994): Small Firm Growth: Intentions, Implementation and Impediments. Business Strategy Review, 5, 49-68  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.1994.tb00166.x
 
Heunks F. (1998): Innovation, creativity and success. Small Business Economics, 10: 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007968217565
 
High Chris, Nemes Gusztáv (2007): Social Learning in LEADER: Exogenous, Endogenous and Hybrid Evaluation in Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 47, 103-119  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.x
 
Horská E., Orémus P. (2008): Processes and problems of the marketing management adaptation at the EU market: The case of the Slovak meat processing industry. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 54: 392–398.
 
Kachaner N., Stalk G., Bloch A. (2012): What you can learn from family business. Harvard Business Review, 90: 102–106.
 
Lefebvre E., Lefebvre L.A., Bourgault M. (1998): R&D-related capabilities as determinants of export performance. Small Business Economics, 10: 365–377.
 
Massis A., Sharma P., Chua J. H., Chrisman J. J. (2012): Family Business Studies – an Annotated Bibliography. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northhampton.
 
Mezera J., Špička J. (2013): Economic effects of investment support of adding value to food products. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5: 39–49.
 
Midmore P. (1993): INPUT-OUTPUT FORECASTING OF REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL POLICY IMPACTS. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44, 284-300  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1993.tb00272.x
 
MoA (2015): Situační a výhledová zpráva vepřové maso 2014. Ministry of Agriculture, Prague.
 
Moore B. (1995): What Differentiates Innovative Small Firms? Innovation Initiative Paper No. 4, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
 
Ollinger Michael (2011): Structural change in the meat and poultry industry and food safety regulations. Agribusiness, 27, 244-257  https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20258
 
Pearce D. (2005): What Constitutes a Good Agri-environmental Policy Evaluation? In Evaluating Agri-Environmental Policies. OECD Publishing.
 
Pohlova K., Mezera J. (2014): Analysis of development of Czech foreign trade in foods and beverages. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 6: 121–131.
 
Psaltopoulos D. (2004): Regional social accounting matrices for structural policy analysis in lagging EU. European Review of Agriculture Economics, 31, 149-178  https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/31.2.149
 
Purvis Gordon, Louwagie Geertrui, Northey Greg, Mortimer Simon, Park Julian, Mauchline Alice, Finn John, Primdahl Jørgen, Vejre Henrik, Vesterager Jens Peter, Knickel Karlheinz, Kasperczyk Nadia, Balázs Katalin, Vlahos George, Christopoulos Stamatios, Peltola Jukka (2009): Conceptual development of a harmonised method for tracking change and evaluating policy in the agri-environment: The Agri-environmental Footprint Index. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 321-337  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.005
 
Ratinger T., Medonos T., Hruška M. (2013): An assessment of the differentiated effects of the investment support to agricultural modernisation: The case of the Czech Republic. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5: 153–164.
 
Roper S. (1997): Product innovation and small business growth: a comparison of the strategies of German, U.K and Irish companies. Small Business Economics, 9: 523– 537.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007963604397
 
Scherer F. M. (1965): Corporate Inventive Output, Profits, and Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 73, 290-  https://doi.org/10.1086/259017
 
Storey D. (1994): Understanding the Small Business Sector. Routledge, London.
 
Špička J., Krause J. (2013): Selected socioeconomic impacts of public support for agricultural biogas plants: the case of the Czech Republic. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19: 929–938.
 
Tether B.S., Massini S. (1998): Employment creation in small technological and design innovators in the UK during the 1980s. Small Business Economics, 11: 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008065115819
 
Troy D.J., Kerry J.P. (2010): Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Science, 86, 214-226  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.009
 
Wren Colin (2005): Regional Grants: Are They Worth It?*. Fiscal Studies, 26, 245-275  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2005.00012.x
 
Wynarczyk P., Thwaites A. (1997): The economic performance, survival and non-survival of innovative small firms. In: Oakey R., Mukhtar S. (eds): New Technology Based Firms in the 1990s. Vol. III, Paul Chapman, London.
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences