Implementation of quality improvements and innovations in agricultural enterprises
This article deals with the implementation of innovations and quality improvements into operations of mainly small and medium-sized enterprises and family farms in the Czech Republic. The aim is to improve the competitiveness of production in internal, European, and global markets, as well as in the context of optimising the settings and recommendations for new subsidies within the Common Agricultural Policy for the forthcoming programming period. The dependence of the use of various forms of innovation in relation to financial crises was investigated, as well as the general (proactive vs. reactive) attitude to innovation, and also mutual operation with Local Action Groups (LAGs) as another source of support. Due to the structure of the obtained data, a general linear model (GLM) was used for the evaluation. Using the methods of advanced statistical testing, the two most important aspects of the implementation of innovations in agriculture enterprises were identified from the obtained data. These two key aspects are: cooperation with the LAG and the use of consultants for processing project applications. Thus, other factors, the size of the farm, the existence of financial problems and the length of farming are not statistically significant. This contribution is intended to help public administration bodies that have a power to set the support conditions for the Rural Development Programme.
Albu R., Chitu I. (2014): Local Action Groups (LAGs) – An important instrument in ensuring the sustainable development of rural areas in Romania. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 7: 97–104.
Andrade D., Pasini F., Scarano F.R. (2020): Syntropy and innovation in agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 45: 20–24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.003
Atkociuniene V., Vaitkevicius S., Stareike E. (2021): Development of sustainable partnership organizational mechanism (POM): Case of local action groups (LAG). Sustainability, 13: 11672.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111672
Benedek Z., Fertő I., Szente V. (2020): The multiplier effects of food relocalization: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12: 3524.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093524
Coca O. (2017): The evaluation of innovation in agriculture. A meta-analytical study of literature. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 17: 111–120.
Delin M. (2012): The role of farmers in Local Action Groups: The case of the national network of the Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 58: 433–442.
https://doi.org/10.17221/148/2011-AGRICECON
Foley J.A., Ramankutty N., Brauman K.A., Cassidy E.S., Gerber J.S., Johnston M., Nathaniel Mueller N.D., O'Connell C., Ray D.K., West P.C., Balzer C., Bennett E.M., Carpenter S.R., Hill J., Monfreda C., Polasky S., Rockström J., Sheehan J., Siebert S., Tilman D., Zaks D.P.M. (2011): Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478: 337–342.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452
Gargano G. (2021): The bottom-up development model as a governance instrument for the rural areas. The cases of four Local Action Groups (LAGs) in the United Kingdom and in Italy. Sustainability, 13: 9123.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169123
Hudečková H., Lošťák M. (2008): LEADER in the Czech Republic and farming sector. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 54: 555–565.
https://doi.org/10.17221/289-AGRICECON
Cheng H., Wang B. (2019): Multiplier effect of science and technology innovation in regional economic development: Based on panel data of coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 94: 883–890.
https://doi.org/10.2112/SI94-175.1
Kostalova J., Vavra J. (2021): Benefits of the LEADER method for Local Agenda 21 – Case study from their application in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 67: 246–254.
https://doi.org/10.17221/407/2020-AGRICECON
Martinez S. (2010): Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues. Collingdale, US, Diane Publishing: 87.
Menconi M., Artemi S., Borghi P., Grohmann D. (2018): Role of Local Action Groups in improving the sense of belonging of local communities with their territories. Sustainability, 10: 4681.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124681
Miller R., Blair P. (2009): Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. 2nd Ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press: 784.
Mizanbekova S., Umbetaliev N., Aitzhanova A., Bogomolov A. (2017): The quality management system. Revista Espacios, 38: 1–29.
Saak A. (2016): Quality Control in Agricultural Value Chains and External Certification. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Available at https://www.ifpri.org/blog/quality-control-agricultural-value-chains-and-external-certification (accessed Nov 7, 2021).
Su Q., Shi J.H., Lai S.J. (2009): Research on the trade-off relationship within quality costs: A case study. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 20: 1395–1405.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360903248922
Svobodová H. (2015): Do the Czech local action groups respect the LEADER method? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63: 1769–1777.
https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563051769
Van Es H., Woodard J. (2017): Innovation in agriculture and food systems in the digital age. In: Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S. (eds.): The Global Innovation Index 2017 – Innovation Feeding the World. 10th Ed. Geneva, Switzerland, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)/New Delhi, India, Confederation of Indian Industry (CII): 97–104.
Volk A., Bojnec Š. (2014): Local action groups and the LEADER co-financing of rural development projects in Slovenia. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 60: 364–375.
https://doi.org/10.17221/180/2013-AGRICECON
Zimon D. (2015): Impact of the implementation of quality management system on operating cost for small and medium-sized business organizations affiliated to a purchasing group. International Journal for Quality Research, 9: 551–564.
