Strategic leadership, environmental uncertainty, and supply chain risk: An empirical investigation of the agribusiness industry

https://doi.org/10.17221/55/2022-AGRICECONCitation:

Abrudan D.B., Daianu D.C., Maticiuc M.D., Rafi N., Kalyar M.N. (2022): Strategic leadership, environmental uncertainty, and supply chain risk: An empirical investigation of the agribusiness industry. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 68: 171–179.

supplementary materialdownload PDF

The present study aims to examine the influence of strategic leadership and environmental uncertainty on supply chain (SC) risk in the agribusiness industry. The notion of SC risk refers to supply risk, delivery risk, and manufacturing process risk, and it is argued that these risks are an outcome of environmental uncertainty. This study postulates that strategic leadership mitigates the detrimental effect of environmental uncertainty on SC risk. On the basis of data collected from 227 agribusiness-related firms, the analysis was performed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings suggest that environmental uncertainty has a direct influence on each dimension of SC risk. In addition to that, a high level of strategic leadership mitigates the impact of environmental uncertainty on supply risk and delivery risk. However, the data did not support moderation for manufacturing process risks. Findings imply that firms operating in highly uncertain environments are more prone to risks; however, high levels of strategic leadership help manage uncertainties and mitigate risks.

References:
Altay N., Gunasekaran A., Dubey R., Childe S.J. (2018): Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: A dynamic capability view. Production Planning & Control, 29: 1158–1174.
 
Birasnav M., Bienstock J. (2019): Supply chain integration, advanced manufacturing technology, and strategic leadership: An empirical study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 130: 142–157.
 
Birkie S.E., Trucco P., Campos P.F. (2017): Effectiveness of resilience capabilities in mitigating disruptions: Leveraging on supply chain structural complexity. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22: 506–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2017-0009
 
Bouckenooghe D., Zafar A., Raja U. (2015): How ethical leadership shapes employees' job performance: The mediating roles of goal congruence and psychological capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 129: 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2162-3
 
Chatterjee S., Chaudhuri R., Shah M., Maheshwari P. (2022): Big data driven innovation for sustaining SME supply chain operation in post COVID-19 scenario: Moderating role of SME technology leadership. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 168: 108058.
 
Cerri J., Thøgersen J., Testa F. (2019): Social desirability and sustainable food research: A systematic literature review. Food Quality and Preference, 71: 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.013
 
Dubey R., Gunasekaran A., Childe S.J., Papadopoulos T., Luo Z., Roubaud D. (2020): Upstream supply chain visibility and complexity effect on focal company's sustainable performance: Indian manufacturers' perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 290: 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2544-x
 
Durugbo C.M., Al-Balushi Z., Anouze A., Amoudi O. (2020): Critical indices and model of uncertainty perception for regional supply chains: Insights from a Delphi-based study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25: 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-10-2019-0373
 
Fornell C., Larcker D.F. (1981): Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
 
Gosling J., Jia F., Gong Y., Brown S. (2016): The role of supply chain leadership in the learning of sustainable practice: Toward an integrated framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137: 1458–1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.029
 
Guo S., Liu N. (2020): Influences of supply chain finance on the mass customization program: Risk attitudes and cash flow shortage. International Transactions in Operational Research, 27: 2396–2421. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12708
 
Gupta A.K. (2021): Innovation dimensions and firm performance synergy in the emerging market: A perspective from dynamic capability theory & signaling theory. Technology in Society, 64: 101512.
 
Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J. (2009): Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River, US, Prentice Hall: 800.
 
Inman R.A., Green K.W. (2022): Environmental uncertainty and supply chain performance: The effect of agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33: 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2021-0097
 
Kock N. (2021): WarpPLS User Manual: Version 7.0. Laredo, US, ScriptWarp Systems: 142.
 
Kumar S.K., Tiwari M., Babiceanu R.F. (2010): Minimisation of supply chain cost with embedded risk using computational intelligence approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 48: 3717–3739. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540902893425
 
Latan H., Jabbour C.J.C., de Sousa Jabbour A.B.L., Wamba S.F., Shahbaz M. (2018): Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management's commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180: 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106
 
Lohmer J., Bugert N., Lasch R. (2020): Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study. International Journal of Production Economics, 228: 107882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882
 
Peters K., Buijs P. (2022): Strategic ambidexterity in green product innovation: Obstacles and implications. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31: 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2881
 
Pournader M., Kach A., Talluri S. (2020): A review of the existing and emerging topics in the supply chain risk management literature. Decision Sciences, 51: 867–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12470
 
Sabir M., Ali Y., Ali A., Khan J., Rehman Z.U. (2022): The choice between organic and inorganic farming: Lessons from Pakistan. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170522000072
 
Samimi M., Cortes A.F., Anderson M.H., Herrmann P. (2020): What is strategic leadership? Developing a framework for future research. The Leadership Quarterly: 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101353
 
Shao Z. (2019): Interaction effect of strategic leadership behaviors and organizational culture on IS-Business strategic alignment and Enterprise Systems assimilation. International Journal of Information Management, 44: 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.010
 
Shekarian M., Nooraie S.V.R., Parast M.M. (2020): An examination of the impact of flexibility and agility on mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics, 220: 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.011
 
Sreedevi R., Saranga H. (2017): Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 193: 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.024
 
Thun J.H., Hoenig D. (2011): An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 131: 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.010
 
Vera D., Crossan M. (2004): Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29: 222–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159030
 
supplementary materialdownload PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti