Rural development policy in Italy: the impact of growth-oriented measures on farm outcomes 

https://doi.org/10.17221/73/2016-AGRICECONCitation:Salvioni C., Sciulli D. (2018): Rural development policy in Italy: the impact of growth-oriented measures on farm outcomes . Agric. Econ. – Czech, 64: 115-130.
download PDF

Growth-oriented measures of the EU’s rural development policy have been promoted to meet the aims of the Lisbon strategy. This article assesses their impact on performance-related variables of farms. We apply a conditional difference-in-differences approach to the 2003–2007 Italian FADN survey. No evidence emerges to indicate any impact of the measures on farm income, employment or partial productivities. Conversely, participation in the selected policy schemes resulted initially in a productivity increase and, subsequently, in enhanced farm performance. We argue that participation in the growth-oriented measures gave rise to a process of capital deepening that, in turn, elicited a productivity increase and, eventually, positive growth rates in farm performance. The estimated variations in capital intensity signal that the measures resulted in the activation of channels that are expected to positively affect farm performance after a time lag.

References:
Ahituv Avner, Kimhi Ayal (2002): Off-farm work and capital accumulation decisions of farmers over the life-cycle: the role of heterogeneity and state dependence. Journal of Development Economics, 68, 329-353 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00016-0
 
Benjamin Catherine, Phimister Euan (2002): Does Capital Market Structure Affect Farm Investment? A Comparison using French and British Farm-Level Panel Data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 1115-1129 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00372
 
Blancard S., Boussemart J.-P., Briec W., Kerstens K. (2006): Short- and Long-Run Credit Constraints in French Agriculture: A Directional Distance Function Framework Using Expenditure-Constrained Profit Functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 351-364 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00863.x
 
Caliendo Marco, Kopeinig Sabine (2008): SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31-72 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
 
Chabé-Ferret Sylvain, Subervie Julie (2013): How much green for the buck? Estimating additional and windfall effects of French agro-environmental schemes by DID-matching. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65, 12-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.09.003
 
Defrancesco E., Gatto P., Runge F., Trestini S. (2008). Factors affecting farmers’ participation in agri-environmental measures: A Northern Italian perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59: 114–131.
 
Dehejia Rajeev H., Wahba Sadek (2002): Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151-161 https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317331982
 
De Long J.B., Summers L.H., Abel A.B. (1992). Equipment investment and economic growth: how strong is the nexus? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1992: 157–211.
 
European Commission (2009): Rural Development (2000–2006) in EU Farms. EC DGAGRI, Brussels.
 
Esposti R., Sotte F. (2013): Evaluating the effectiveness of agricultural and rural policies: an introduction. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40, 535-539 https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbt014
 
Goddard Ellen, Weersink Alfons, Chen Kevin, Turvey Calum G. (1993): Economics of Structural Change in Agriculture. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 41, 475-489 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.1993.tb03772.x
 
Hazell P B., Poulto C., Wiggin, S., Dorwar A. (2007): The future of small farms for poverty reduction and growth. Discussion Paper 42, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington.
 
Heckman J. J., Ichimura H., Todd P. E. (1997): Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605-654 https://doi.org/10.2307/2971733
 
Heckman J.J., Ichimura H., Smith J., Todd P.E. (1998): Characterizing selection bias using experimental data, Econometrica. 66: 1017–1098.
 
Heckman James, Navarro-Lozano Salvador (2004): Using Matching, Instrumental Variables, and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 30-57 https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323023660
 
Kirchweger S., Kantelhardt J., Leisch F. (2016): Impacts of the government-supported investments on the economic farm performance in Austria. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 61, 343-355 https://doi.org/10.17221/250/2014-AGRICECON
 
Medonos T., Ratinger T., Hruska M., Spicka J. (2012): The assessment of the effects of investment support measures of the rural development programmes: the case of the Czech Republic. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 4: 35–48.
 
Michalek J., Ciaian P., Kancs D. (2013): Firm-level evidence of deadweight loss of investment support policies: a case study of dairy farms in Schleswig-Holstein. In: IATRC 2013 Symposium: Productivity and Its Impacts on Global Trade, June 2–4, 2013, Seville.
 
Moro D., Sckokai P. (2011): The impact of pillar 1 support on farm choices: conceptual and methodological challenges. In: 122nd EAAE Seminar, Feb 17–18, 2011, Ancona.
 
OECD (2009): Methods to Monitor and Evaluate the Impacts of Agricultural Policies on Rural Development. OECD, Paris.
 
Ortner K.M. (2012): Evaluation of investment support in rural development programmes: results for selected measures. In: Cvijanović D., Floriańczyk Z. (eds): Rural Development Policies from the EU Enlargement Perspective. ERDN book series, Rural areas and development, 9: 39–50.
 
Pascucci S., de-Magistris T., Dries L., Adinolfi F., Capitanio F. (2013): Participation of Italian farmers in rural development policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40, 605-631 https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbt005
 
Power Laura (1998): The Missing Link: Technology, Investment, and Productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 300-313 https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557393
 
Pufahl A., Weiss C. R. (2009): Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: results from propensity score matching. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36, 79-101 https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbp001
 
Romer Paul M. (1986): Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037 https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
 
ROSENBAUM PAUL R., RUBIN DONALD B. (1983): The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55 https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
 
Rosenzweig Mark R., Binswanger Hans P. (1993): Wealth, Weather Risk and the Composition and Profitability of Agricultural Investments. The Economic Journal, 103, 56- https://doi.org/10.2307/2234337
 
Smith J.A., Todd P.E. (2005): Does matching overcome Lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125: 305–353.
 
Todd P.E. (2008): Evaluating social programs with endogenous program placement and selection of the treated. In: Schultz T.P., Strauss J.A. (eds): Handbook of Development Economics, 4: 3847–3894.
 
Udagawa Chihiro, Hodge Ian, Reader Mark (2014): Farm Level Costs of Agri-environment Measures: The Impact of Entry Level Stewardship on Cereal Farm Incomes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65, 212-233 https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12043
 
Weiss C. R. (1999): Farm Growth and Survival: Econometric Evidence for Individual Farms in Upper Austria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 103-116 https://doi.org/10.2307/1244454
 
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences