Cross-country analysis of efficiency and productivity in the biotech industry: an application of the generalized metafrontier Malmquist productivity index Y.-., Chen K.-., Wu C.-. (2015): Cross-country analysis of efficiency and productivity in the biotech industry: an application of the generalized metafrontier Malmquist productivity index. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 61: 116-134.
download PDF
The paper provides insights into the price transmission of dairy sector in Slovakia and examined the nature of price adjustments and market efficiency along the vertical chain. The results were based on monthly prices covering the time period 2004–2012. The farm gate prices of raw cow milk Q class and I. class were distinguished and the comparison was made also between the prices of semi-fat milk and durable semi-fat milk. The methodological approach called the Vector Error Correction model (VECM) was applied in the paper due to the fact that the Johansen co-integration test revealed that the time series were co-integrated, meaning that the long run relationship existed between them. The obtained results were in line with the recent empirical findings that have shown that the market power on the demand side, the imperfect market structure existence and also the fact that milk is a highly perishable commodity might be the explanations for the revealed asymmetric price adjustments.
Ayinde O.E., Adewumi M.O., Ojehomon V.E. (2009): Determinants of technical efficiency and varietal-gap of rice production in Nigeria: A meta-frontier model approach. In: International Association of Agricultural Economics conference, Beijing, China, August: 16–22.
Battese G. E., Coelli T. J. (1992): Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-169
Battese G. E., Coelli T. J. (1995): A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332
Battese G.E., Rao D.S.P. (2002): Technology gap, efficiency and a stochastic metafrontier function. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1: 87–93.
Battese George E., Rao D. S. Prasada, O’Donnell Christopher J. (2004): A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21, 91-103
Bos J.W., Schmiedel H. (2007): Is there a single frontier in a single European banking market? Journal of Banking & Finance, 31: 2081–2102.
Boshrabadi Hossein Mehrabi, Villano Renato, Fleming Euan (2008): Technical efficiency and environmental-technological gaps in wheat production in Kerman province of Iran. Agricultural Economics, 38, 67-76
Boskin M.J., Lau L.J. (1992): International and intertemporal comparison of productive efficiency: an application of the meta-production function approach to the group-of-five (G-5) countries. The Economic Studies Quarterly, 43: 298–312.
Caves D.W., Christensen L.R., Diwert W.E. (1982): The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica, 50: 1393−1414.
Chen Ku-Hsieh, Huang Yi-Ju, Yang Chih-Hai (2009): Analysis of regional productivity growth in China: A generalized metafrontier MPI approach. China Economic Review, 20, 777-792
CHEN Zhuo, SONG Shunfeng (2008): Efficiency and technology gap in China's agriculture: A regional meta-frontier analysis. China Economic Review, 19, 287-296
Chen K.H., Yang H.Y. (2008): Extensions of the metafrontier Malmquist productivity index: an empirical study with cross-country macro-data. Taiwan Economic Review, 36: 551–588.
Chiu Y.H., Hu J.L., Tsao C.L. (2003): Cost efficiency of biotech firms in Taiwan. Agriculture and Economics, 31: 55–78.
Chuang Y.C., Hsu B.F.(1999): Productivity, R&D, and intra- and inter-industry spillovers in Taiwan’s manufacturing industry. Academia Economics Papers, 27: 407–432.
Coelli T.J., Rao D.S.P., O’ Donnell C.J., Battese G.E. (2005): An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. 2nd ed. Springer Inc., New York.
Denny M., Fuss M., Waverman L. (1981): The measurement and interpretation of total factor productivity in regulated industries with an application to Canadian telecommunications. In: Cowing T.G., Stevenson R.E. (eds): Productivity Measurement in Regulated. Academic Press, New York: 179–218.
Diewert W.E. (1976): Exact and superlative index numbers. Journal of Econometrics, 4: 115−145.
Dietsch Michel, Lozano-Vivas Ana (2000): How the environment determines banking efficiency: A comparison between French and Spanish industries. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24, 985-1004
González Eduardo, Gascón Fernando (2004): Sources of productivity growth in the Spanish pharmaceutical industry (1994–2000). Research Policy, 33, 735-745
Griliches Z., Mairesse J. (1984): Productivity and R&D at the firm level. In: Griliches Z. (ed.): R&D, Patent and Productivity. University of Chicago press, Chicago: 339–374.
Hashimoto A., Haneda S. (2008): Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 37: 1829–1836.
Hayami Yujiro (1969): Sources of Agricultural Productivity Gap among Selected Countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51, 564-
Hayami Y., Ruttan V.W. (1970): Agricultural productivity differences among countries. American Economic Review, 40: 895-911.
Hill Hal, Kalirajan K. P. (1993): Small enterprise and firm-level technical efficiency in the Indonesian garment industry. Applied Economics, 25, 1137-1144
Hsieh S.T., Wan J.J., Lu T. J. (2007): The innovation efficiency of agricultural biotechnology firm in Taiwan. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82: 1–25.
Huang T.H., Chang B.G., Chiu Y.F. (2009): An examination of banks efficiency for six Asian countries using the metafrontier cost function. Academic Paper, 36: 61–100.
Industrial Development Bureau (2009): Biotechnology Industry in Taiwan 2008. Industrial Development Bureau/MOEA, Taiwan.
Krishnasamy G., Ahmed E.M. (2009): Productivity growth analysis in OECD countries: Application of metafrontier functions. The Journal of the Korean Economy, 10: 225–244.
Lau L.J. (1986): Functional forms in econometric model building. In: Griliches Z., Intriligator M.D. (eds): Handbook of Econometrics. Vol. III, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.
Lau Lawrence J., Yotopoulos Pan A. (1989): The meta-production function approach to technological change in world agriculture. Journal of Development Economics, 31, 241-269
Li Y., Li S.J. (2008): Analyzing TFP of Asian biotech firms: application of stochastic frontier approach. Agricultural and Resources Economics, 5: 55–76.
Luh Y.H., Shih K.C. (2005): International spillovers and productivity growth: a cross-economy comparison. Taiwan Economics Forecast and Policy, 36: 103–130.
O’Donnell Christopher J., Rao D. S. Prasada, Battese George E. (2008): Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Economics, 34, 231-255
Odagiri H., Murakami N. (1992): Private and quasi-social rates of return on pharmaceutical R&D in Japan. Research Policy, 21: 335–345.
Oh D.H., Lee J.D. (2010): A metafrontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity index. Empirical Economics, 38: 46–64.
Orea L. (2002): Parametric decomposition of a generalized Malmquist productivity index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18: 5–22.
Pasiouras Fotios, Tanna Sailesh, Zopounidis Constantin (2009): The impact of banking regulations on banks' cost and profit efficiency: Cross-country evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 18, 294-302
Rao D.S.P. (2006): Metafrontier Frameworks for the Study of Firm-Level Efficiencies and Technology Gaps. In: Productivity and Efficiency Seminar, Taipei, March 10, Taiwan.
Ray S.C. (1998): Measuring scale efficiency from a translog production function. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11: 183–194.
Ruttan V.W., Binswanger H.P., Hayami Y., Wade W.W., Weber A. (1978): Factor productivity and growth: a historcial interpretation. In: Binswanger H.P., Ruttran V.W. (eds): Induced Innovation: Technology, Institution, and Developments. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Saranga H (): Multiple objective data envelopment analysis as applied to the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1480-1493
Sharma Khem R., Leung Pingsun (2000): Technical efficiency of carp pond culture in South Asia: An application of a stochastic meta‐production frontier model. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 4, 169-189
Shephard R.W. (1970): The Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press., Princeton.
Staikouras Christos, Mamatzakis Emmanuel, Koutsomanoli-Filippaki Anastasia (2008): Cost efficiency of the banking industry in the South Eastern European region. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18, 483-497
Tsai S.T., Wann J.J. (1995): Selecting functional form for empirical economic model – the case of Taiwan rice production function. Taiwanese Agricultural Economic Review, 1: 187–216.
Villano R., Fleming P., Fleming E. (2008): Evidence of scope economies in Australian agriculture. In: Proceeding of the Australian Agriculture and Resource Economics Society-conference (52nd), February 5–8, 2008, Canberra.
Yang C.H., Chen K.H. (2009): Are small firms less efficient? Small Business Economics, 32: 375–395.
Yang C.H., Chen J.R. (2002): R&D, patents and productivity – evidence from Taiwanese manafacturing firms. Taiwan Economic Review, 30: 27–48.
Yen H.P., Chang J.W., Woo R.J. (2008): A study of cost efficiency on credit department of Farmers’ Associations in Taiwan: A metafrontier approach. Taiwan Journal of Applied Economics, 84: 159–193.
2008 White Book by the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries Program Office (2009): Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taipei.
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences