Estimation of inbreeding effect on conception in Czech Holsteiná M., Přibyl J., Krupa E., Pešek P. (2019): Estimation of inbreeding effect on conception in Czech Holstein. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 64: 309-316.
download PDF

The influence of calculated inbreeding coefficients on the conception of heifers and cows was analysed by a two-trait binary model for conceived/not conceived after each insemination on 677 234 Czech Holstein cows and heifers with 3 248 299 insemination records as the covariable in a statistical model. The data between 1996 and 2014 were analysed. Various effects and their statistical influence on traits were tested by a generalized linear model. Consequently, genetic parameters were estimated by the Gibbs sampling method and used in predicting breeding values using the best linear unbiased prediction by animal model (BLUP-AM). The mean for the conception rate of cows averaged over lactations was 33.7% and for heifers it reached 53.8%. Average inbreeding coefficient increased from 1% in 1996 to almost 5% by 2013 and was in the range of 0–45%. The rate of inbreeding per generation was 0.20%. Although the effect of inbreeding was statistically significant (P = 0.05) for both traits, the proportion of variability explained by the models was relatively low. Estimated genetic parameters were low for both traits. Coefficient of heritability was 2.00% and 1.30% for cows and heifers, respectively, whereas coefficients of repeatability reached 6.09% and 7.08% for cows and heifers, respectively. The random effect of the permanent environment (PE) reached higher values than the additive genetic variance (G) and explained 5.67% and 4.09% of variability for cows and heifers, respectively. A negative impact of inbreeding on heifer and cow conception was observed, whereby every 10% increase in inbreeding coefficient resulted in a conception decline by 2.23%. Calculated Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between estimated breeding values considering and not considering the effect of inbreeding was close to one. Presented results indicate that inbreeding has a negligible influence on the breeding values of conception. The results also indicate that it is not necessary to include inbreeding coefficient in the routine breeding value evaluation of conception rate of heifers and cows. On the other hand, monitoring of inbreeding is necessary to avoid an increase of its rate.

Aliloo H., Pryce J.E., González-Recio O., Cocks B.G., Goddard M.E., Hayes B.J. (2017): Including nonadditive genetic effects in mating programs to maximize dairy farm profitability. Journal of Dairy Science, 100, 1203-1222
Bezdicek J., Subrt J., Filipcik R., Bjelka M., Dufek A. (2007): The effect of inbreeding on service period and pregnancy length in Holsteins and Czech Flecviehs after the first calving. Archiv für Tierzucht, 50, 455–463.
Bjelland D.W., Weigel K.A., Vukasinovic N., Nkrumah J.D. (2013): Evaluation of inbreeding depression in Holstein cattle using whole-genome SNP markers and alternative measures of genomic inbreeding. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 4697-4706
Boichard D. (2002): Pedig: A Fortran package for pedigree analysis suited to large population. In: 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, 525–528.
Brade W. (2016): Do we need specialized breeding objectives for different production systems in German Holsteins? Tieraerztliche Umschau, 71, 454–465.
Cecchi F., Giacalone G., Paci G. (2016): Inbreeding depression in the Lizard canary breed estimated by pedigree analysis. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61, 15-21
Colleau Jean-Jacques (2002): An indirect approach to the extensive calculation of relationship coefficients. Genetics Selection Evolution, 34, 409-
Dezetter C., Leclerc H., Mattalia S., Barbat A., Boichard D., Ducrocq V. (2015): Inbreeding and crossbreeding parameters for production and fertility traits in Holstein, Montbéliarde, and Normande cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 4904-4913
Doležalová M., Stádník L., Biniová Z., Ducháček J., Stupka R. (2016): Equilibration and freezing interactions affecting bull sperm characteristics after thawing. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61, 515-525
Du Toit J, Van Wyk JB, Maiwashe A (2012): Assessment of inbreeding depression for functional herd life in the South African Jersey breed based on level and rate of inbreeding. South African Journal of Animal Science, 42, -
González-Recio O., López de Maturana E., Gutiérrez J.P. (2007): Inbreeding Depression on Female Fertility and Calving Ease in Spanish Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 5744-5752
Groeneveld E., Westhuizen B.V.D., Maiwashe A., Voordewind F., Ferraz J.B.S. (2009): POPREP: a generic report for population management. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8, 1158-1178
Hinrichs D., Bennewitz J., Wellmann R., Thaller G. (2015): Estimation of ancestral inbreeding effects on stillbirth, calving ease and birthweight in German Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 132, 59-67
Jakubec V., Bezdicek J., Louda F. (2010): Selection – Inbreeding – Hybridization. Agrovýzkum Rapotín s.r.o., Rapotín, Czech Republic. (in Czech)
Kurykin J., Hallap T., Jalakas M., Padrik P., Kaart T., Johannisson A., Jaakma Ü. (2016): Effect of insemination-related factors on pregnancy rate using sexed semen in Holstein heifers. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61, 568-577
Lüttgenau J., Purschke S., Tsousis G., Bruckmaier R.M., Bollwein H. (2016): Body condition loss and increased serum levels of nonesterified fatty acids enhance progesterone levels at estrus and reduce estrous activity and insemination rates in postpartum dairy cows. Theriogenology, 85, 656-663
MacCluer Jean W., Boyce Anthony J., Dyke Bennett, Weitkamp Lowell R., Pfenning David W., Parsons Cindy J. (1983): Inbreeding and pedigree structure in Standardbred horses. Journal of Heredity, 74, 394-399
Maignel L., Boichard D., Verrier E. (1996): Genetic variability of French dairy breeds estimated from pedigree information. Interbull Bulletin, 14, 49–54.
Parland S.Mc, Kearney J.F., Rath M., Berry D.P. (2007): Inbreeding Effects on Milk Production, Calving Performance, Fertility, and Conformation in Irish Holstein-Friesians. Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 4411-4419
Misztal I., Tsuruta S., Strabel T., Auvray B., Druet T., Lee D.H. (2002): Blupf90 and related programs (BGF90). In: Proc. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, 19–23.
Misztal I., Tsuruta S., Lourenco D., Aguilar I., Legarra A., Vitezica Z. (2014): Manual for BLUPF90 family of programs. University of Georgia, Athens, USA.
Müller M.-P., Rothammer S., Seichter D., Russ I., Hinrichs D., Tetens J., Thaller G., Medugorac I. (2017): Genome-wide mapping of 10 calving and fertility traits in Holstein dairy cattle with special regard to chromosome 18. Journal of Dairy Science, 100, 1987-2006
Pinedo P.J., Melendez P., Paudyal S., Krauss R., Arias F., Lopez H., Luco A., Vergara C.F. (2016): Association between disease occurrence and fertility of dairy cows in three geographic regions of Chile. Theriogenology, 86, 817-823
Rokouei M., Vaez Torshizi R., Moradi Shahrbabak M., Sargolzaei M., Sørensen A.C. (2010): Monitoring inbreeding trends and inbreeding depression for economically important traits of Holstein cattle in Iran. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 3294-3302
Sargolzaei M., Iwaisaki H., Colleau J.J. (2006): CFC: A tool for monitoring genetic diversity. In: Proc. 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied in Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 27–28. (CD-ROM communication)
Sørensen A.C., Sørensen M.K., Berg P. (2005): Inbreeding in Danish Dairy Cattle Breeds. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 1865-1872
Szwaczkowski Tomasz, Greguła-Kania Monika, Stachurska Anna, Borowska Alicja, Jaworski Zbigniew, Gruszecki Tomasz M., Plaizier J. (2016): Inter- and intra-genetic diversity in the Polish Konik horse: implications for the conservation program. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 96, 570-580
Tenghe A. M. M., Berglund B., Wall E., Veerkamp R. F., de Koning D. J. (2016): Opportunities for genomic prediction for fertility using endocrine and classical fertility traits in dairy cattle1. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 3645-3654
Thompson J.R., Everett R.W., Hammerschmidt N.L. (2000): Effects of Inbreeding on Production and Survival in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 1856-1864
Thornhill N.W. (1993): The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA and London, UK.
VanRaden P.M. (1992): Accounting for Inbreeding and Crossbreeding in Genetic Evaluation of Large Populations. Journal of Dairy Science, 75, 3136-3144
Vostrá-Vydrová H., Vostrý L., Hofmanová B., Krupa E., Veselá Z., Schmidová J. (2016): Genetic diversity within and gene flow between three draught horse breeds using genealogical information. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61, 462-472
Weller J.I., Ron M. (1992): Genetic Analysis of Fertility Traits in Israeli Holsteins by Linear and Threshold Models. Journal of Dairy Science, 75, 2541-2548
Zhang Qianqian, Calus Mario PL, Guldbrandtsen Bernt, Lund Mogens S, Sahana Goutam (2015): Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds. BMC Genetics, 16, -
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences