Placental characteristics of German Landrace sows and their relationships to different fertility parameters A., Maass M., Brüssow K.P. (2018): Placental characteristics of German Landrace sows and their relationships to different fertility parameters  . Czech J. Anim. Sci., 63: 339-346.
download PDF

The placenta is the central foetal organ that ensures a sufficient exchange of nutrients and metabolites for adequate foetal growth. Specific data profiles for placental characteristics from modern pig lines with high fertility and today’s genetics are not currently available. This study focuses on describing the placental weight and size of German Landrace pigs and any subsequent relationship to litter number and important fertility parameters for these sows. As a basis for data collection, 55 litters from primi- and multiparous German Landrace sows with a total of 832 piglets were used. From these births, 766 placentas were recovered and weighed, with their lengths measured and the placental efficiency per litter also calculated. Mean placental weights ranged from 179 ± 60 to 422 ± 96 g between litters, and the mean length was between 61 ± 12 and 145 ± 19 cm. The placental efficiency was at a level of 5.1 ± 0.7. The investigated parameters were only slightly affected by the litter number (r = 0.3), and the means did not significantly differ between different litter numbers. With increasing litter size, the piglet weights and placental lengths were significantly decreased (r = –0.4 and r = –0.3), possibly due to limited uterine space. However, litter size had a strong positive correlation with the total litter placental weight (r = 0.7); therefore, in this study, the placental efficiency was not affected by a higher number of piglets per sow. Higher means for placental weights (r = 0.7) and lengths (r = 0.7) in a particular litter significantly improved the piglet birth weights. The reported variability in placental characteristics between litters suggests that there is an opportunity to selectively breed for improved piglet weight and homogeneity and thus improved piglet health and survival.

Beaulieu A. D., Aalhus J. L., Williams N. H., Patience J. F. (2010): Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork1. Journal of Animal Science, 88, 2767-2778
Biensen N J, Wilson M E, Ford S P (1998): The impact of either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterus on Meishan or Yorkshire fetal and placental development to days 70, 90, and 110 of gestation.. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 2169-
Biensen N J, Wilson M E, Ford S P (1999): The impacts of uterine environment and fetal genotype on conceptus size and placental vascularity during late gestation in pigs.. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 954-
Borges Vladimir F., Bernardi Mari L., Bortolozzo Fernando P., Wentz Ivo (2005): Risk factors for stillbirth and foetal mummification in four Brazilian swine herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 70, 165-176
Bruessow K.-P., Waehner M. (2008): Biological potentials of fecundity of sows. Zuchtungskunde, 80, 370–377. (in German)
de Jong Ellen, Kauffold Johannes, Engl Silke, Jourquin Jan, Maes Dominiek (2013): Effect of a GnRH analogue (Maprelin) on the reproductive performance of gilts and sows. Theriogenology, 80, 870-877
Dourmad J.-Y., Noblet J., Pere M.C., Etienne M. (1999): Mating, pregnancy and prenatal growth. In: Kyriazakis I. (ed.): A Quantitative Biology of the Pig. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 129–151.
Fischer K., Brüssow K.P., Schlegel H., Wähner M. (2011): Cluster analysis as a tool to assess litter size in conjunction with the amount of embryonic and fetal losses in pigs. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 27, 785-790
Ford S.P., Vonnahme K.A., Wilson M.E. (2002): Uterine capacity in the pig reflects a combination of uterine environment and conceptus genotype effects. Journal of Animal Science, 80, E66–E73.
Freking B. A., Leymaster K. A., Vallet J. L., Christenson R. K. (2007): Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity1. Journal of Animal Science, 85, 2093-2103
Freking B.A., Lents C.A., Vallet J.L. (2016): Selection for uterine capacity improves lifetime productivity of sows. Animal Reproduction Science, 167, 16-21
Johnson R K, Nielsen M K, Casey D S (1999): Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size.. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 541-
Knight J. W., Bazer Fuller W., Thatcher W. W., Franke D. E., Wallace H. D. (1977): Conceptus Development in Intact and Unilaterally Hysterectomized-Ovariectomized Gilts: Interrelations among Hormonal Status, Placental Development, Fetal Fluids and Fetal Growth. Journal of Animal Science, 44, 620-637
Mesa H., Safranski T. J., Cammack K. M., Weaber R. L., Lamberson W. R. (2006): Genetic and phenotypic relationships of farrowing and weaning survival to birth and placental weights in pigs1. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 32-40
Mesa H., Cammack K. M., Safranski T. J., Green J. A., Lamberson W. R. (2012): Selection for placental efficiency in swine: Conceptus development1. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 4217-4222
Noblet J., Close W. H., Heavens R. P., Brown D. (1985): Studies on the energy metabolism of the pregnant sow. British Journal of Nutrition, 53, 251-
Père Marie-Christine, Etienne Michel (2000): Uterine blood flow in sows: effects of pregnancy stage and litter size. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 40, 369-382
Rootwelt V., Reksen O., Farstad W., Framstad T. (2013): Postpartum deaths: Piglet, placental, and umbilical characteristics1. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 2647-2656
Tummaruk P., Kesdangsakonwut S. (2014): Uterine size in replacement gilts associated with age, body weight, growth rate, and reproductive status. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 59, 511-518
Vallet J. L., Freking B. A. (2006): Changes in fetal organ weights during gestation after selection for ovulation rate and uterine capacity in swine1,2. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 2338-2345
Vallet J. L., Klemcke H. G., Christenson R. K. (2002): Interrelationships among conceptus size, uterine protein secretion, fetal erythropoiesis, and uterine capacity. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 729-737
Vonnahme K.A., Ford S.P. (2003): Selection for above-average placental efficiency increased placental expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor system in pigs. Biology of Reproduction, 68 (Suppl. 1), 205.
Waehner M., Huehn U. (2016): 80 years periodic farrowing systems in piglet production in Germany – A review: 1. Production systems for group farrowing from 1990 to present time. Zuchtungskunde, 88, 353–370.
Wilson Matthew E., Biensen Nina J., Youngs Curtis R., Ford Stephen P. (1998): Development of Meishan and Yorkshire Littermate Conceptuses in Either a Meishan or Yorkshire Uterine Environment to Day 90 of Gestation and to Term1. Biology of Reproduction, 58, 905-910
Wilson M E, Biensen N J, Ford S P (1999): Novel insight into the control of litter size in pigs, using placental efficiency as a selection tool.. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 1654-
Wu M. C., Chen Z. Y., Jarrell V. L., Dziuk P. J. (1989): Effect of Initial Length of Uterus per Embryo on Fetal Survival and Development in the Pig. Journal of Animal Science, 67, 1767-
ZHANG Tian, WANG Li-gang, SHI Hui-bi, YAN Hua, ZHANG Long-chao, LIU Xin, PU Lei, LIANG Jing, ZHANG Yue-bo, ZHAO Ke-bin, WANG Li-xian (2016): Hritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of litter uniformity and litter size in Large White sows. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15, 848-854
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences