Substantial hybridisation between wild boars (Sus scrofa scrofa) and East Balkan pigs (Sus scrofa f. domestica) in natural environment as a result of semi-wild rearing in Bulgaria I.S., Stoeckle B.C., Markov G., Kuehn R. (2017): Substantial hybridisation between wild boars (Sus scrofa scrofa) and East Balkan pigs (Sus scrofa f. domestica) in natural environment as a result of semi-wild rearing in Bulgaria. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 62: 1-8.
supplementary materialdownload PDF
The East Balkan pig (EBP) is a traditional domestic pig breed in Bulgaria managed in semi-wild conditions and well-adapted to the continental climate and rearing on pastures. From the genetical and historical point of view it is important to preserve this ancient breed. However, over the last several years, a dramatic decline of EBP herds has been observed. Moreover, introgression between EBP and wild boar in Bulgaria (WBB) is very likely to have occurred. In this study we used a set of 10 microsatellites and the polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism method on melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) polymorphisms to study the degree of hybridisation between WBB, EBP, and a commercial pig breed (CPB). MC1R results identified WBB-EBP hybrids and the analysis of the microsatellite data with a Bayesian assignment approach and the Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components revealed a low genetic differentiation between WBB and EBP and a high amount of introgression of WBB into EBP. A mentionable introgression of CPB into EBP was also revealed. It is apparent that the traditional rearing system of EBP, which is hundreds of years old, has led to a permanent hybridisation between WBB and EBP. In our opinion, the preservation of the semi-wild rearing system is a prerequisite for the conservation of this old, indigenous pig breed and its genetic composition, as the semi-wild rearing system allows the continuous introgression with WBB. Moreover, the introgression of commercial breeds into EBP or WBB should be prevented. Due to the bidirectional gene flow these hybridisation events would have negative consequences (i.e. loss of viability and adaptation) for the wild boars as well as for the indigenous pig breed.
Canu Antonio, Costa Stefano, Iacolina Laura, Piatti Piergiovanni, Apollonio Marco, Scandura Massimo (2014): Are captive wild boar more introgressed than free-ranging wild boar? Two case studies in Italy. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 60, 459-467
Ciobanu Daniel C, Day Andrew E, Nagy Alexandru, Wales Richard, Rothschild Max F, Plastow Graham S (2001): Genetic variation in two conserved local Romanian pig breeds using type 1 DNA markers. Genetics Selection Evolution, 33, 417-
Dimitrov Ts., Dimitrova l. (1994): PRESERVATION OF LIVESTOCK GENETIC RESOURCES IN BULGARIA. Animal Genetic Resources Information, 14, 41-59
Druml Thomas, Salajpal Kresimir, Dikic Maria, Urosevic Miroslav, Grilz-Seger Gertrud, Baumung Roswitha (2012): Genetic diversity, population structure and subdivision of local Balkan pig breeds in Austria, Croatia, Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina and its practical value in conservation programs. Genetics Selection Evolution, 44, 5-
Earl Dent A., vonHoldt Bridgett M. (2012): STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4, 359-361
EVANNO G., REGNAUT S., GOUDET J. (2005): Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2611-2620
Fajardo Violeta, González Isabel, Martín Irene, Rojas Marı´a, Hernández Pablo E., Garcı´a Teresa, Martín Rosario (2008): Differentiation of European wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa) and domestic swine (Sus scrofa domestica) meats by PCR analysis targeting the mitochondrial D-loop and the nuclear melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) genes. Meat Science, 78, 314-322
Fang Meiying, Larson Greger, Soares Ribeiro Helena, Li Ning, Andersson Leif, Barsh Gregory S. (2009): Contrasting Mode of Evolution at a Coat Color Locus in Wild and Domestic Pigs. PLoS Genetics, 5, e1000341-
Fontanesi L., Ribani A., Scotti E., Utzeri V.J., Veličković N., Dall’Olio S. (2014): Differentiation of meat from European wild boars and domestic pigs using polymorphisms in the MC1R and NR6A1 genes. Meat Science, , -
Frantz Alain C., Massei Giovanna, Burke Terry (2012): Genetic evidence for past hybridisation between domestic pigs and English wild boars. Conservation Genetics, 13, 1355-1364
Frantz Alain C., Zachos Frank E., Kirschning Julia, Cellina Sandra, Bertouille Sabine, Mamuris Zissis, Koutsogiannouli Evagelia A., Burke Terry (2013): Genetic evidence for introgression between domestic pigs and wild boars ( Sus scrofa ) in Belgium and Luxembourg: a comparative approach with multiple marker systems. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 110, 104-115
Genov P., Nikolovg H., Massei G., Gerasimov S. (1991): Craniometrical analysis of Bulgarian wild boar ( Sus scrofa ) populations. Journal of Zoology, 225, 309-325
Georgiev I., Benkov B. (1964a): Industrial crossing of East Balkan Swine with boars from breeds Manhgalica and Bulgarian White. Journal of Animal Sciences, 2, 3–15.
Georgiev I., Benkov B. (1964b): Investigation of the effect of industrial crossing of East Balkan Swine with boars from breeds Bercsheer and breeding group Coloured Derman Sow. Journal of Animal Sciences, 3, 15–23.
Guo Sun Wei, Thompson Elizabeth A. (1992): Performing the Exact Test of Hardy-Weinberg Proportion for Multiple Alleles. Biometrics, 48, 361-
Hirata D., Doichev V. D., Raichev E. G., Palova N. A., Nakev J. L., Yordanov Y. M., Kaneko Y., Masuda R. (2015): Genetic variation of the East Balkan Swine ( Sus scrofa ) in Bulgaria, revealed by mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosomal DNA. Animal Genetics, 46, 209-212
Hlebarov G. (1921): The East Balkan Pig. Zemizdat, Sofia, Bulgaria.
HUBISZ MELISSA J., FALUSH DANIEL, STEPHENS MATTHEW, PRITCHARD JONATHAN K. (2009): Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 1322-1332
Jombart Thibaut, Devillard Sébastien, Balloux François (2010): Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genetics, 11, 94-
Kijas J.M.H., Wales R., Tornsten A., Chardon P., Moller M., Andersson L. (1998): Melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) mutations and coat colour in pigs. Genetics, 150, 1177–1185.
Koutsogiannouli Evagelia A., Moutou Katerina A., Sarafidou Theologia, Stamatis Costas, Mamuris Zissis (2010): Detection of hybrids between wild boars (Sus scrofa scrofa) and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa f. domestica) in Greece, using the PCR-RFLP method on melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) mutations. Mammalian Biology - Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 75, 69-73
Lowden S., Finlayson H.A., Macdonald A.A., Downing A.C., Goodman S.J., Leus K., Kaspe L., Wahyuni E., Archibald A.L. (2002): Application of Sus scrofa microsatellite markers to wild Suiformes. Conservation Genetics, 3, 347–350.
Nakev J., Kulev K. (2013): Status of the controlled population of the East Balkan swine breed. Agrarni Nauki, 5, 27–30.
Nakev J., Marchev Y., Nedeva R., Ivanova-Peneva S., Palova N., Gineva E., Kulev K. (2011): East Balkan swine breed – current state and perspectives. Agrarni Nauki, 6, 89–93.
Nikolov Ivan Stojanov, Gum Bernhard, Markov Georgi, Kuehn Ralph (2009): Population genetic structure of wild boar Sus scrofa in Bulgaria as revealed by microsatellite analysis. Acta Theriologica, 54, 193-205
Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. (2000): Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945–959.
Puechmaille Sebastien J. (2016): The program structure does not reliably recover the correct population structure when sampling is uneven: subsampling and new estimators alleviate the problem. Molecular Ecology Resources, 16, 608-627
Raymond M., Rousset F. (1995): GENEPOP (Version 1.2): Population Genetics Software for Exact Tests and Ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249
Rohrer G.A., Alexander L.J., Keele J.W., Smith T.P., Beattie C.W. (1994): A microsatellite linkage map of the porcine genome. Genetics, 136, 231–245.
Roy M.S., Geffen E., Smith D., Ostrander E.A., Wayne R.K. (1994): Patterns of differentiation and hybridisation in North American wolflike canids, revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11, 553–570.
Scandura M., Iacolina L., Crestanello B., Pecchioli E., Di Benedetto M.F., Russo V., Davoli R., Apollonio M., Bertorelle G. (2008): Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the European wild boar: are the effects of the last glaciation still detectable? Molecular Ecology, 17, 1745–1762.
Scandura M., Iacolina L., Cossu A., Apollonio M. (2011a): Effects of human perturbation on the genetic make-up of an island population: the case of the Sardinian wild boar. Heredity, 106, 1012–1020.
Scandura M., Iacolina L., Apollonio M. (2011b): Genetic diversity in the European wild boar Sus scrofa: phylogeography, population structure and wild × domestic hybridisation. Mammal Review, 41, 125–137.
Šprem Nikica, Salajpal Krešimir, Safner Toni, Đikić Domagoj, Jurić Julija, Curik Ino, Đikić Marija, Cubric-Curik Vlatka (2014): Genetic analysis of hybridization between domesticated endangered pig breeds and wild boar. Livestock Science, 162, 1-4
VAN OOSTERHOUT COCK, HUTCHINSON WILLIAM F., WILLS DEREK P. M., SHIPLEY PETER (2004): micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 535-538
Weir B. S., Cockerham C. Clark (1984): Estimating F-Statistics for the Analysis of Population Structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-
supplementary materialdownload PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti