Comparison of starch digestibility methods for extruded wheat grains (Triticum aestivum L.)

Homolková D., Plachý V., Maňourová A., Kaválek M., Dvořáček V., Hučko B., Marounek M., Doskočil I. (2021): Comparison of starch digestibility methods for extruded wheat grains (Triticum aestivum L.). Czech J. Anim. Sci., 66 (2021): 420-427

download PDF

This study compared different methods of determining starch digestibility (in vivo vs in vitro) in wheat grains and evaluated the influence of extrusion on digestibility. In vivo starch digestibility was determined in broiler chickens by calculating the residual starch content in their ilea and the digestibility using a chromium oxide indicator. In vitro digestibility was examined using pepsin and pancreatin. During in vivo testing, the highest digestibility coefficient (DC) was achieved by the Bonanza variety in its extruded form (91.19 ± 0.40%). In contrast, the lowest DC was achieved by the Tobak variety in its non-extruded form (81.45 ± 1.92%). Generally, a higher DC was observed in vivo for extruded forms of wheat. During in vitro testing, the highest DC was achieved by the Stefii variety in its non-extruded form (96.10 ± 0.55%), whereas the lowest DC was observed in the Yetti variety in its extruded form (49.72 ± 0.41%). Overall, the in vitro experiments did not exhibit significant differences between extruded and non-extruded forms of wheat. Linear regression analysis showed a strong relationship (r2 = 0.860; 85.98%) between in vivo- and in vitro-derived DC values in all wheat varieties, both in extruded and non-extruded forms. The study showed that in vivo testing is a suitable method for the determination and control of starch levels in extruded materials. However, despite the accuracy of this technique, it is also very demanding in terms of time, space, equipment, and methodological knowledge. Therefore, based on the strong correlation between the in vivo and in vitro assays, we recommend in vitro digestibility testing as a preferable alternative.


Akerlind M, Weisbjerg M, Eriksson T, Togersen R, Uden P, Olafsson BL, Harstad OM, Volden H. Feed analyses and digestion methods. In: Volden H, editor. NorFor – The Nordic feed evaluation system. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2011. p. 41-54.
Amerah AM. Interactions between wheat characteristics and feed enzyme supplementation in broiler diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2015 Jan 1;199:1-9.
Ball MEE, Owens B, McCracken KJ. The effect of variety and growing conditions on the chemical composition and nutritive value of wheat for broiler. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013a Mar;26(3):378-85.
Ball MEE, Owens B, McCracken KJ. Chemical and physical predictors of the nutritive value of wheat in broiler diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013b Jan;26(1):97-107.
Bedford MR, Classen HL. An in vitro assay for prediction of broiler intestinal viscosity and growth when fed rye-based diets in the presence of exogenous enzymes. Poult Sci. 1993 Jan;72(1):137-43.
Biel W, Stankowski S, Jaroszewska A, Puzynski S, Bosko P. The influence of selected agronomic factors on the chemical composition of spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta L.) grain. J Intergat Agric. 2016 Aug 1;15(8):1763-9.
Carre B, Idi A, Maisonnier S, Melcion JP, Oury FX, Gomez J, Pluchard P. Relationships between digestibilities of food components and characteristics of wheats (Triticum aestivum) introduced as the only cereal source in a broiler chicken diet. Br Poult Sci. 2002 Jul 1;43(3):404-15.
Carre B, Muley N, Gomez J, Oury FX, Laffitte E, Guillou D, Signoret C. Soft wheat instead of hard wheat in pelleted diets results in high starch digestibility in broiler chickens. Br Poulth Sci. 2005 Feb 1;46(1):66-74.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and laboratory testing for the official control of feedingstuffs. OJEU. 2009 Feb 26;L54: 130 p.
FAO – Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations [Internet]. Crops/World Total/Area Harvested/2019 (pick list). 2018 Feb 19 [updated 2019; cited 2021 Mar 30]. Available from:
FAO – Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations [Internet]. World food situation: FAO cereal supply and demand brief. 2020 [updated 2020; cited 2021 Mar 30 ]. Available from:
Hidalgo A, Scuppa S, Brandolini A. Technological quality and chemical composition of puffed grains from einkorn (Triticum monococcum L. subsp. monococcum) and bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. subsp. aestivum). LWT – Food Sci Technol. 2016 May 1;68:541-8.
Imam SH, Bilbao-Sainz C, Chiou BS, Glenn GM, Orts WJ. Biobased adhesives, gums, emulsions, and binders: Current trends and future prospects. J Adhes Sci Tech. 2013 Oct 1;27(18-19):1972-97.
Karunaratne ND, Abbott DA, Hucl PJ, Chibbar RN, Pozniak CJ, Classen HL. Starch digestibility and apparent smetabolisable energy of western Canadian wheat market classes in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2018 Aug 1;97(8):2818-28.
Kim JC, Mullan BP, Simmins PH, Pluske JR. Variation in the chemical composition of wheats grown in Western Australia as influenced by variety, growing region, season, and postharvest storage. Aust J Agric Res. 2003 Jun 24;54(6):541-50.
Konieczka P, Kaczmarek SA, Hejdysz M, Kinsner M, Szkopek D, Smulikowska S. Effects of faba bean extrusion and phytase supplementation on performance, phosphorus and nitrogen retention, and gut microbiota activity in broilers. J Sci Food Agric. 2020 Aug 30;100(11):4217-25.
Naeem HA, Paulon D, Irmak S, MacRitchie F. Developmental and environmental effects on the assembly of glutenin polymers and the impact on grain quality of wheat. J Cer Sci. 2012 Jul 1;56(1):51-7.
Opoku EY, Classen HL, Scott TA. The effects of extrusion of wheat distillers dried grains with solubles with or without an enzyme cocktail on performance of turkey hen poults. Poult Sci. 2015 Feb 1;94(2):185-94.
Peron A, Bastianelli D, Oury FX, Gomez J, Carre B. Effects of food deprivation and particle size of ground wheat on digestibility of food components in broilers fed on a pelleted diet. Br Poult Sci. 2005 Apr 1;46(2):223-30.
Rodriguez DA, Lee SA, Jones CK, Htoo JK, Stein HH. Digestibility of amino acids, fiber, and energy by growing pigs, and concentrations of digestible and smetabolisable energy in yellow dent corn, hard red winter wheat, and sorghum may be influenced by extrusion. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2020 Oct 1;268: 11 p.
Santala O, Kiran A, Sozer N, Poutanen K, Nordlund E. Enzymatic modification and particle size reduction of wheat bran improves the mechanical properties and structure of bran-enriched expanded extrudates. J Cereal Sci. 2014 Sep 1;60(2):448-56.
Scudamore K, Guy RCE, Kelleher B, MacDonald SJ. Fate of Fusarium mycotoxins in smaise flour and grits during extrusion cooking. Food Addit Contam. 2008 Nov 1;25(11):1374-84.
Selle PH, Moss AF, Khoddami A, Chrystal PV, Liu SY. Starch digestion rates in multiple samples of commonly used feed grains in diets for broiler chickens. Anim Nutr. 2021 Jun;7(2):450-9.
Svihus B, Edvardsen DH, Bedford MR, Gullord M. Effect of methods of analysis and heat treatment on viscosity of wheat, barley and oats. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2000 Nov 30;88(1-2):1-12.
SZIF – State Agricultural Intervention Fund. Postup sklizne obilovin a repky v CR k 9. 9. 2019 [The process of harvesting cereals and rape in the Czech Republic in 2019. Procedure as of 9 September 2019] [Internet]. Prague: SZIF 2019 [cited 2021 Mar 30]. 5 p. Available from: Czech.
Turnbull KM, Rahman S. Endosperm texture in wheat. J Cereal Sci. 2002 Nov 1;36(3):327-37.
Wieser H, Koehler P, Scherf KA. Wheat – An exceptional crop: Botanical features, chemistry, utilization, nutritional and health aspects. 1 st ed. Cambridge: Elsevier; 2020 Jul 3. Chapter 2. Chemical composition of wheat grains; p. 13-45.
Wiseman J, Nicol NT, Norton G. Relationship between apparent metabolisable (AME) values and in vivo/in vitro starch digestibility of wheat for broilers. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2000 Dec;56(4):305-18.
Xiaoguang Y, Ran Y, Ye C. Blasting extrusion processing: The increase of soluble dietary fiber content and extraction of soluble-fiber polysaccharides from wheat bran. Food Chem. 2015 Aug 1;180:106-15.
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti