Contribution of domestic and Interbull records to reliabilities of single-step genomic breeding values in dairy cattle
J. Bauer, J. Přibyl, L. Vostrýhttps://doi.org/10.17221/8240-CJASCitation:Bauer J., Přibyl J., Vostrý L. (2015): Contribution of domestic and Interbull records to reliabilities of single-step genomic breeding values in dairy cattle. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 60: 263-267.
The method of approximating reliabilities of genomic breeding values in the single-step genomic BLUP evaluation procedure of Misztal et al. (2013) was used to evaluate the increase in reliability of breeding values for milk production in dairy cattle brought about by the inclusion of genomic data. Three strategies for approximation of reliabilities were compared: using only domestic records from performance testing of cows in the Czech Holstein dairy cattle population, using the same records in combination with Interbull breeding values of sires expressed as deregressed proofs, and using only the Interbull breeding values of sires expressed as deregressed proofs. The highest average reliability of genomic breeding values was achieved by the strategy using both domestic and Interbull data, for which the approximated reliabilities of genotyped bulls increased by 0.063. This general increase in reliability of genomic breeding values was small due to the small number of reference bulls available for the study. The overall increase in reliabilities for the entire population of dairy cattle was low but detectable. That modest increase was partially dependent on the unfavourable ratio of the number of genotyped bulls to the size of the analyzed population. Inclusion of Interbull data dramatically increased the benefits of genotyping in our test case – a relatively small population with substantial genetic contributions of foreign genes.Keywords:data combining; genomic selection; reliability; single-step GBLUPReferences:
Christensen Ole F, Lund Mogens S (2010): Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, 2- https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-2de Roos A. P. W., Hayes B. J., Goddard M. E. (): Reliability of Genomic Predictions Across Multiple Populations. Genetics, 183, 1545-1553 https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.104935Forni Selma, Aguilar Ignacio, Misztal Ignacy (2011): Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genetics Selection Evolution, 43, 1- https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-43-1Habier David, Tetens Jens, Seefried Franz-Reinhold, Lichtner Peter, Thaller Georg (2010): The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, 5- https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-5Lund M.S., Su G., Nielsen U.S., Aamand G.P. (2009): Relation between accuracies of genomic predictions and ancestral links to the training data. Interbull Bulletin, 40, 162–166.Lund Mogens S, de Ross Sander PW, de Vries Alfred G, Druet Tom, Ducrocq Vincent, Fritz Sebastian, Guillaume Francois, Guldbrandtsen Bernt, Liu Zenting, Reents Reinhard, Schrooten Chris, Seefried Franz, Su Guosheng (2011): A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions. Genetics Selection Evolution, 43, 43- https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-43-43Misztal I., Lawlor T.J., Short T.H. (1993): Implementation of Single- and Multiple-Trait Animal Models for Genetic Evaluation of Holstein Type Traits. Journal of Dairy Science, 76, 1421-1432 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77473-1Misztal I., Legarra A., Aguilar I. (2009): Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 4648-4655 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2064Misztal I., Tsuruta S., Aguilar I., Legarra A., VanRaden P.M., Lawlor T.J. (2013): Methods to approximate reliabilities in single-step genomic evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 647-654 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5656Pribyl J., Haman J., Kott T., Pribylova J., Simeckova M., Vostry L., Zavadilova L., Cermak V., Ruzicka Z., Splichal J., Verner M., Motycka J., Vondrasek L. (2012): Single-step prediction of genomic breeding value in a small dairy cattle population with strong import of foreign genes. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57, 151–159.Přibyl J., Madsen P., Bauer J., Přibylová J., Šimečková M., Vostrý L., Zavadilová L. (2013): Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 1865-1873 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6157Pryce J.E., Arias J., Bowman P.J., Davis S.R., Macdonald K.A., Waghorn G.C., Wales W.J., Williams Y.J., Spelman R.J., Hayes B.J. (2012): Accuracy of genomic predictions of residual feed intake and 250-day body weight in growing heifers using 625,000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 2108-2119 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4628Pszczola M., Strabel T., Mulder H.A., Calus M.P.L. (2012): Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 389-400 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4338Szyda Joanna, Żarnecki Andrzej, Suchocki Tomasz, Kamiński Stanisław (2011): Fitting and validating the genomic evaluation model to Polish Holstein-Friesian cattle. Journal of Applied Genetics, 52, 363-366 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-011-0047-zVanRaden P.M. (2008): Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 4414-4423 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0980VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. (2009): Invited Review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 16-24 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1514VITEZICA Z. G., AGUILAR I., MISZTAL I., LEGARRA A. (2011): Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Genetics Research, 93, 357-366 https://doi.org/10.1017/S001667231100022X