Persistence of bifidobacteria in the intestines of calves after administration in freeze-dried form or in fermented milk
M. Geigerová, E. Vlková, V. Bunešová, V. Radahttps://doi.org/10.17221/8727-CJASCitation:Geigerová M., Vlková E., Bunešová V., Rada V. (2016): Persistence of bifidobacteria in the intestines of calves after administration in freeze-dried form or in fermented milk. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 61: 49-57.
In order to improve the gut microbiome of calves, probiotic bacteria can be fed as active living-cells (fermented milk), or as live but inactive (freeze-dried) cultures. Ten bifidobacterial strains with suitable probiotic properties (as determined in our previous study) were tested for survival during the freeze-drying process, and screened for their ability to ferment cow’s milk. The viability of both freeze-dried and live-cell cultures during storage was also tested. All of the strains tested were able to ferment cow’s milk, with average counts of 8.26 ± 0.62 log CFU/ml. Eight out of the ten strains were able to survive in milk for 2 months in counts higher than 106 CFU/ml. Bifidobacteria showed high viability following the freeze-drying process, with average numbers of 9.03 ± 0.22 log CFU/vial and did not decrease after 12 months of storage. The mixture of rifampicin-resistant variants of bifidobacteria (RRBs) was fed to 2-day-old dairy Charolais calves in the form of living-cells, or as freeze-dried bacteria. The control group was given no probiotics. Survival of the RRBs administered and the numbers of other bacterial groups in faecal samples was monitored by culturing. Bifidobacteria that were administered passed successfully through the upper parts of the gastrointestinal tract, and were found in numbers higher than 109 CFU/g for two weeks. RRBs colonized the intestines of calves for at least 63 days in both treatment groups. Significantly higher total counts of bifidobacteria were found in the treated groups, compared to the control group. Reduction in Escherichia coli and total coliforms numbers, and an increase in lactobacilli counts were observed in both experimental groups following the application of the probiotic mixtures. Our results show that both forms of administering probiotic bifidobacteria to calves are effective, but that the freeze-dried form is more suitable from a practical viewpoint.Keywords:probiotic bacteria; technological properties; storage conditions; gut; young ruminantsReferences:
probiotic bacteria; technological properties; storage conditions; gut; young ruminantsAbu-Tarboush Hamza M., Al-Saiady Mohamed Y., Keir El-Din Ahmed H. (1996): Evaluation of diet containing Lactobacilli on performance, Fecal Coliform, and Lactobacilli of young dairy calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57, 39-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00850-0Awati A.A. (2014): Think outside the gut! Effects of probiotics on animal performance and the environment. International Scientific Conference on Probiotics and Prebiotics – IPC2014, Budapest, Hungary, 14.Bayatkouhsar J., Tahmasebi A.M., Naserian A.A., Mokarram R.R., Valizadeh R. (2013): Effects of supplementation of lactic acid bacteria on growth performance, blood metabolites and fecal coliform and lactobacilli of young dairy calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 186, 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.015Bayram Bahri, Yanar Mete, Güler Olcay, Metin Jale (2010): Growth performance, health and behavioural characteristics of Brown Swiss calves fed a limited amount of acidified whole milk. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 6, 273- https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.273Bunesova V., Vlkova E., Rada V., Killer J., Musilova S. (2014): Bifidobacteria from the gastrointestinal tract of animals: differences and similarities. Beneficial Microbes, 5, 377-388 https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2013.0081Carvalho Ana S., Silva Joana, Ho Peter, Teixeira Paula, Malcata F.Xavier, Gibbs Paul (2004): Relevant factors for the preparation of freeze-dried lactic acid bacteria. International Dairy Journal, 14, 835-847 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.02.001Champagne Claude P., Raymond Yves, Tompkins Thomas A. (2010): The determination of viable counts in probiotic cultures microencapsulated by spray-coating. Food Microbiology, 27, 1104-1111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.07.017Costa E., Usall J., Teixido N., Garcia N., Vinas I. (2000): Effect of protective agents, rehydration media and initial cell concentration on viability of Pantoea agglomerans strain CPA-2 subjected to freeze-drying. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 89, 793-800 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01182.xDel Razo-Rodriguez O.E., Ramirez-Bribiesca J.E., Lopez-Arellano R., Revilla-Vazquez A.L., Gonzalez-Munoz S.S., Cobos-Peralta M.A., Hernandez-Calva L.M., McDowell L.R. (2013): Effect of dietary level of selenium and grain on digestive metabolism in lambs. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 58, 253–261.FAO/WHO (2002): Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Working Group on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization, London, UK/Ontario, Canada.Fasoli Sara, Marzotto Marta, Rizzotti Lucia, Rossi Franca, Dellaglio Franco, Torriani Sandra (2003): Bacterial composition of commercial probiotic products as evaluated by PCR-DGGE analysis. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 82, 59-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00259-3Frizzo L.S., Soto L.P., Zbrun M.V., Bertozzi E., Sequeira G., Armesto R. Rodríguez, Rosmini M.R. (2010): Lactic acid bacteria to improve growth performance in young calves fed milk replacer and spray-dried whey powder. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 157, 159-167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.03.005Frizzo L.S., Zbrun M.V., Soto L.P., Signorini M.L. (2011): Effects of probiotics on growth performance in young calves: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 169, 147-156 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.009Hu L., Che L., Su G., Xuan Y., Luo G., Han F., Wu Y., Tian G., Wu C., Fang Z., Lin Y., Xu S., Wu D. (2014): Inclusion of yeast-derived protein in weanling diet improves growth performance, intestinal health, and anti-oxidative capability of piglets. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 59, 327–336.Livney Yoav D. (2010): Milk proteins as vehicles for bioactives. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 15, 73-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2009.11.002Maamouri O., Selmi H., M’hamdi N. (2014): Effects of Yeast (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) Feed Supplement on Milk Production and its Composition in Tunisian Holstein Friesian Cows. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 45, - https://doi.org/10.2478/sab-2014-0104Maldonado Natalia C., de Ruiz Clara Silva, Otero María Claudia, Sesma Fernando, Nader-Macías María Elena (2012): Lactic acid bacteria isolated from young calves – Characterization and potential as probiotics. Research in Veterinary Science, 92, 342-349 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.03.017Martinez Fabio Andres Castillo, Balciunas Eduardo Marcos, Converti Attilio, Cotter Paul D., de Souza Oliveira Ricardo Pinheiro (2013): Bacteriocin production by Bifidobacterium spp. A review. Biotechnology Advances, 31, 482-488 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.010Moore J. (2004): The use of probiotics in the calf: an overview. Cattle Practice, 12, 125–128.Mudgal V., Baghel R.P.S. (2010): Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth performance of pre-ruminant buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves. Buffalo Bulletin, 29, 225–228.Poddar Devastotra, Das Shantanu, Jones Geoff, Palmer Jon, Jameson Geoffrey B., Haverkamp Richard G., Singh Harjinder (2014): Stability of probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei during storage as affected by the drying method. International Dairy Journal, 39, 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.04.007QADIS Abdul Qadir, GOYA Satoru, IKUTA Kentaro, YATSU Minoru, KIMURA Atsushi, NAKANISHI Shusuke, SATO Shigeru (2014): Effects of a Bacteria-Based Probiotic on Ruminal pH, Volatile Fatty Acids and Bacterial Flora of Holstein Calves. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 76, 877-885 https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.14-0028Quigley Lisa, O'Sullivan Orla, Stanton Catherine, Beresford Tom P., Ross R. Paul, Fitzgerald Gerald F., Cotter Paul D. (): The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 37, 664-698 https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12030Rada V, Petr J (2000): A new selective medium for the isolation of glucose non-fermenting bifidobacteria from hen caeca. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 43, 127-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00205-0Rada V., Marounek M., Rychlý I., Šantrŭčková D., Vořišek K. (1995): Effect of <i>Lactobacillus salivarius</i> administrationon microflora in the crop and caeca of broilerchickens. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 4, 161-170 https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/69790/1995Rochet Violaine, Rigottier-Gois Lionel, Ledaire Audrey, Andrieux Claude, Sutren Malène, Rabot Sylvie, Mogenet Agnès, Bresson Jean-Louis, Cools Stéphanie, Picard Céline, Goupil-Feuillerat Nathalie, Doré Joël (2008): Survival of <i>Bifidobacterium animalis</i> DN-173 010 in the Faecal Microbiota after Administration in Lyophilised Form or in Fermented Product – A Randomised Study in Healthy Adults. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 14, 128-136 https://doi.org/10.1159/000106092Mohamadi Roodposhti Pezhman, Dabiri Najafgholi (2012): Effects of Probiotic and Prebiotic on Average Daily Gain, Fecal Shedding of Escherichia Coli, and Immune System Status in Newborn Female Calves. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 25, 1255-1261 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11312Saxelin Maija, Lassig Anna, Karjalainen Heli, Tynkkynen Soile, Surakka Anu, Vapaatalo Heikki, Järvenpää Salme, Korpela Riitta, Mutanen Marja, Hatakka Katja (2010): Persistence of probiotic strains in the gastrointestinal tract when administered as capsules, yoghurt, or cheese. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 144, 293-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.009Simon O., Jadamus A., Vahjen W. (2001): Probiotic feed additives - effectiveness andexpected modes of action. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 10, 51-67 https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/70012/2001Soto L.P., Zbrun M.V., Frizzo L.S., Signorini M.L., Sequeira G.J., Rosmini M.R. (2014): Effects of bacterial inoculants in milk on the performance of intensively reared calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 189, 117-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.12.004Timmerman H.M., Mulder L., Everts H., van Espen D.C., van der Wal E., Klaassen G., Rouwers S.M.G., Hartemink R., Rombouts F.M., Beynen A.C. (2005): Health and Growth of Veal Calves Fed Milk Replacers With or Without Probiotics. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 2154-2165 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72891-5Uyeno Yutaka, Sekiguchi Yuji, Tajima Kiyoshi, Takenaka Akio, Kurihara Mitsunori, Kamagata Yoichi (2010): An rRNA-based analysis for evaluating the effect of heat stress on the rumen microbial composition of Holstein heifers. Anaerobe, 16, 27-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.04.006Vinderola C.G, Bailo N, Reinheimer J.A (2000): Survival of probiotic microflora in Argentinian yoghurts during refrigerated storage. Food Research International, 33, 97-102 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00011-9Vlkova E., Grmanova M., Rada V., Homutova I., Dubna S. (2009): Selection of probiotic bifidobacteria for lambs. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54, 552–565.Vlková E., Grmanová M., Killer J., Mrázek J., Kopečný J., Bunešová V., Rada V. (2010): Survival of bifidobacteria administered to calves. Folia Microbiologica, 55, 390-392 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-010-0066-x