Feasibility of rearing brook char fingerlings in an intensive recirculating hatchery as a complementary species to rainbow trout
M. Buřič, J. Bláhovec, J. Kouřilhttps://doi.org/10.17221/8663-CJASCitation:Buřič M., Bláhovec J., Kouřil J. (2016): Feasibility of rearing brook char fingerlings in an intensive recirculating hatchery as a complementary species to rainbow trout. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 61: 8-14.
Aquaculture, as the fastest growing agriculture sector, is currently focused on exploring the development of effective intensive recirculating systems (RAS). The use of intensive RAS requires a stable supply of fingerlings throughout the year. Salmonids are a highly important aquaculture species, with rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss often reared in freshwater RASs. The dominant position of rainbow trout has triggered the investigation of a wider diversification of species, including brook char Salvelinus fontinalis. Brook char has the potential to be reared in facilities similar to those used for rainbow trout, but it is not known if brook char is suitable for hatching in an intensive recirculating hatchery system (RHS) to provide a consistent supply of fingerlings to an associated RAS roughly every three months. The present study evaluated the feasibility of producing brook char fingerlings in an RHS and compared results to those obtained with rainbow trout. A production cycle from eyed egg to fingerling was completed separately for rainbow trout, brook char, and parallel rearing of both species for the comparison of growth rate, feed conversion ratio, and the time to reach individual fingerling weight of 2 g. The results showed slower growth rate of brook char compared to rainbow trout reared under the same conditions and a significantly longer production cycle (~108 days), compared to rainbow trout (~74 days). Results suggest that brook char is not suitable for parallel rearing in facilities with primary rainbow trout production. The main practical problem is disruption of the production cycle which requires fingerling stocking at 3-month intervals.Keywords:aquaculture; RAS; nursery; growth rate; salmonidReferences:
Bailey Jason, Alanärä Anders (2006): Effect of feed portion size on growth of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), reared at different temperatures. Aquaculture, 253, 728-730 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.09.026Buric M., Blahovec J., Kouril J. (2015a): Back to the roots: the integration of a constructed wetland to a recirculating hatchery – a case study. PLoS ONE, 10, e0123577.Buřič Miloš, Bláhovec Josef, Kouřil Jan (2014): Feasibility of open recirculating system in temperate climate - a case study. Aquaculture Research, , n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12572Colt John (2006): Water quality requirements for reuse systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 34, 143-156 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.011Council Directive 2006/88/EC of 24 October 2006 on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals. Official Journal of the European Union, L 328, 14.d’orbcastel Emmanuelle Roque, Blancheton Jean-Paul, Belaud Alain (2009): Water quality and rainbow trout performance in a Danish Model Farm recirculating system: Comparison with a flow through system. Aquacultural Engineering, 40, 135-143 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2009.02.002Dalsgaard Johanne, Lund Ivar, Thorarinsdottir Ragnheidur, Drengstig Asbjørn, Arvonen Kaj, Pedersen Per Bovbjerg (2013): Farming different species in RAS in Nordic countries: Current status and future perspectives. Aquacultural Engineering, 53, 2-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.11.008Davidson John, Good Christopher, Welsh Carla, Summerfelt Steven T. (2014): Comparing the effects of high vs. low nitrate on the health, performance, and welfare of juvenile rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss within water recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 59, 30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2014.01.003Dewailly É., Ayotte P., Lucas M., Blanchet C. (2007): Risk and benefits from consuming salmon and trout: A Canadian perspective. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 45, 1343-1348 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.01.010Fischer Gregory J., Held James, Hartleb Christopher, Malison Jeffrey (2009): Evaluation of brook trout production in a coldwater recycle aquaculture system. Aquacultural Engineering, 41, 109-113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2009.06.012FAO (2014): The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Opportunities and Challenges. FAO, Rome, Italy.HASTEIN T., BINDE M., HINE M., JOHNSEN S., LILLEHAUG A., OLESEN N.J., PURVIS N., SCARFE A.D., WRIGHT B. (2008): Planteamientos, planes y programas nacionales de seguridad biológica en respuesta a las enfermedades de animales acuáticos criados en cautividad : evolución, eficacia y rumbo futuro. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE, 27, 125-145 https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.27.1.1798Jokumsen A., Svendsen L.M. (2010): Farming of freshwater rainbow trout in Denmark. DTU Aqua, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Charlottenlund, Denmark.Martins C.I.M., Eding E.H., Verdegem M.C.J., Heinsbroek L.T.N., Schneider O., Blancheton J.P., d’Orbcastel E. Roque, Verreth J.A.J. (2010): New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in Europe: A perspective on environmental sustainability. Aquacultural Engineering, 43, 83-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2010.09.002Pedersen L.-F., Suhr K.I., Dalsgaard J., Pedersen P.B., Arvin E. (2012): Effects of feed loading on nitrogen balances and fish performance in replicated recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 338, 237–245.Summerfelt Steven T, Davidson John W, Waldrop Thomas B, Tsukuda Scott M, Bebak-Williams Julie (2004): A partial-reuse system for coldwater aquaculture. Aquacultural Engineering, 31, 157-181 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2004.03.005Svinger Viktor W., Policar Tomas, Steinbach Christoph, Polakova Simona, Jankovych Antonin, Kouril Jan (2013): Synchronization of ovulation in brook char (Salvelinus fontinalis, Mitchill 1814) using emulsified d-Arg6Pro9NEt sGnRHa. Aquaculture International, 21, 783-799 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9578-5Terjesen Bendik Fyhn, Summerfelt Steven T., Nerland Ståle, Ulgenes Yngve, Fjæra Svein Olav, Megård Reiten Britt Kristin, Selset Roger, Kolarevic Jelena, Brunsvik Per, Bæverfjord Grete, Takle Harald, Kittelsen Arne H., Åsgård Torbjørn (2013): Design, dimensioning, and performance of a research facility for studies on the requirements of fish in RAS environments. Aquacultural Engineering, 54, 49-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.11.002Unger Julia, Brinker Alexander (2013): Feed and treat: What to expect from commercial diets. Aquacultural Engineering, 53, 19-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.11.012Wall Rebecca, Ross R Paul, Fitzgerald Gerald F, Stanton Catherine (2010): Fatty acids from fish: the anti-inflammatory potential of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids. Nutrition Reviews, 68, 280-289 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00287.xWilfart Aurélie, Prudhomme Jehane, Blancheton Jean-Paul, Aubin Joël (2013): LCA and emergy accounting of aquaculture systems: Towards ecological intensification. Journal of Environmental Management, 121, 96-109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.031