Investigation of pork meat in chicken- and beef-based commercial products by ELISA and real-time PCR sold at retail in Kosovo

https://doi.org/10.17221/164/2020-CJFSCitation:

Gecaj R.M., Muji S., Ajazi F.C., Berisha B., Kryeziu A., Ismaili M. (2021): Investigation of pork meat in chicken- and beef-based commercial products by ELISA and real-time PCR sold at retail in Kosovo. Czech J. Food Sci., 39: 368–375.

supplementary materialdownload PDF

Food adulteration and fraudulent practices are widely observed in the food industry worldwide and are of great concern for Balkan countries. This study aims at investigating the level of undeclared pork meat in commercial beef and chicken meat products sold in Kosovo by implying one commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and two confirmatory real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approaches [ready-to-use real-time PCR and real-time PCR with primers specific for pork mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)]. In supermarkets in the capital city, Prishtina, 62 meat products were randomly sampled, and the three methods were applied. Additionally, these three approaches were evaluated for their practicability, reproducibility, and cost. The results showed that pork was present in 32% of beef- and 8% chicken-based products. ELISA and real-time PCR with pork specific primers showed 100% of reproducibility for beef- and chicken-based products. In contrast, the ready-to-use real-time PCR kit showed 100% reproducibility in chicken-, but only 75% in beef-based samples. ELISA was more rapid than both real-time PCR approaches, but it was more challenging when large numbers of samples were processed. The real-time PCR approach with pork specific primers was the cheapest, while the ready-to-use real-time PCR was the most practical method. Commercial ELISA, in combination with real-time PCR with pork specific primers, provides a reliable and affordable testing methodology that can be implemented for rapid detection and monitoring of pork adulteration in diverse commercial foods.

References:
Ali M.E., Razzak M.A., Hamid S.B.A. (2014): Multiplex PCR in species authentication: Probability and prospects – A review. Food Analytical Methods, 7: 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-014-9844-4
 
Asensio L., Gonzalez I., Garcia T., Martin R. (2008): Determination of food authenticity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Food Control, 1: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.02.010
 
Ballin N.Z., Vogense F.K., Karlsson A.H. (2009): Species determination – Can we detect and quantify meat adulteration? Meat Science, 83: 165–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.06.003
 
Bauer T., Weller P., Hammes W.P., Hertel C. (2003): The effect of processing parameters on DNA degradation in food. European Food Research and Technology, 217: 338–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-003-0743-y
 
Cai Y., He Y., Ly R., Chen H., Pan L. (2017): Detection and quantification of beef and pork materials in meat products by duplex droplet digital PCR. PLoS One, 12: e0181949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181949
 
Cammà C., Di Domenico M., Monaco F. (2012): Development and validation of fast real-time PCR assays for species identification in raw and cooked meat mixtures. Food Control, 23: 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.08.007
 
Di Pinto A., Forte V.T., Guastadisegni M.C., Martino C., Schena F.P., Tantillo G.A. (2017): Comparison of DNA extraction methods for food analysis. Food Control, 18: 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.08.011
 
Dooley J.J., Paine K.E., Garrett S.D., Brown H.M. (2004): Detection of meat species using TaqMan real-time PCR assays. Meat Science, 68: 431–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.04.010
 
FAO (2019): The Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database (FAOSTAT). Available at https://fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed Aug, 2019).
 
Flaudrops C., Armstrong N., Raoult D., Chabrière E. (2015): Determination of the animal origin of meat and gelatin by MALDI-TOF-MS. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 41: 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2015.02.009
 
Gecaj R.M., Berisha B., Ajazi A., Muji S. (2018): Detection of ingredients in salami and sausages from different brands sold in Kosovo market by PCR. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, 22: 18–24.
 
Giovannacci I., Guizard C., Carlier M., Duval V., Martin J.L., Demeulemester C. (2004): Species identification of meat products by ELISA. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 39: 863–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00859.x
 
Hsieh Y.H., Ofori J.A. (2014): Detection of horsemeat contamination in raw and heat-processed meat products. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62: 12536–12544. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf504032j
 
Laube I., Zagon J., Broll H. (2007): Quantitative determination of commercially relevant species in foods by real-time PCR. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 42: 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01249.x
 
Manovi L., Skender M., Bajram B., Ajazi C F., Gecaj R. (2019): Application of ELISA and RT-PCR for the detection of pork adulterated in beef meat products marked in Kosovo. In: Hajrizi E. (ed.): Proceedings UBT International Conference, Prishtina, Kosovo, Oct 25–27, 2019: 404.
 
Musto M. (2011): DNA quality and integrity of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences from beef meat as affected by different cooking methods. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 49: 523–528.
 
Nau JY. (2013): Horse meat: First lessons of a scandal. Revue Medicale Suisse, 9: 532–533.
 
Nikzad J., Shahhosseini S., Tabarzad M., Nafissi-Varcheh N., Torshabi M. (2017): Simultaneous detection of bovine and porcine DNA in pharmaceutical gelatin capsules by duplex PCR assay for halal authentication. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 25: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40199-017-0171-3
 
Perestam A.T., Fujisaki K.K., Nava O., Hellberg R.S. (2017): Comparison of real time PCR and ELISA-based methods for the detection of beef and pork in processed meat products. Food Control, 71: 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.07.017
 
Piskata Z., Pospisilova E., Borilova G. (2017): Comparative study of DNA extraction methods from fresh and processed yellowfin tuna muscle tissue. International Journal of Food Properties, 20: S430–S443. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2017.1297953
 
Piskata Z., Servusova E., Babak V., Nesvadbova M., Borilova G. (2019): The quality of DNA isolated from processed food and feed via different extraction procedures. Molecules, 24: 1188. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061188
 
Johnson R. (2014): Food fraud and 'economically motivated adulteration' of food and food ingredients. Congressional Research Service Report, R43358: 1–40.
 
Soares S., Amaral J.S., Oliveira M.B., Mafra I. (2013): A SYBR Green real-time PCR assay to detect and quantify pork meat in processed poultry meat products. Meat Science, 4: 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.12.012
 
Spink J., Moyer D.C. (2011): Defining the public health threat of food fraud. Journal of Food Science, 76: R157–R162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x
 
WHO (1997): HACCP: Introducing the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point System. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization (WHO): 1–15. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/63610 (accessed Aug 19, 2019).
 
Wisniewski A., Buschulte A. (2019): How to tackle food fraud in official food control authorities in Germany. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 14: 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-019-01228-2
 
supplementary materialdownload PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti