Comparison of biochemical and antimicrobial activities of different honey samples

Keskin S., Karlidag S., Mayda N., Ozkok A. (2021): Comparison of biochemical and antimicrobial activities of different honey samples. Czech J. Food Sci., 39: 273–280.

download PDF

Honey, a natural healing agent and a sweet food, has been used since ancient times. A honey sample could possess many biological activities depending on its chemical composition. The amount and the diversity of these minor components of honey mainly depend on the floral sources. That is why the biological activity of the honey sample obtained in a region should be determined. In this study, total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant activity, melissopalynological analyses and antimicrobial activity of twenty honey samples obtained from Doganyol, Malatya, Turkey were examined. In order to determine the in vitro antibacterial activity of honey samples, the agar well diffusion (AWD) method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assays were used. For this purpose, ten Gram-positive bacteria and eight Gram-negative bacteria were used. Total phenolic content was found in the range from 9.68 ± 0.72 to 29.40 ± 1.03 mg GAE g–1 sample. Antioxidant activity of honey samples varied from 2.21 ± 0.46 to 6.03 ± 1.11 µmol FeSO4 7H2O g–1. Honey samples showed moderate antimicrobial activity against tested microorganisms, especially against Gram-positive bacteria. It could be concluded from our findings that there is a good correlation between total phenolic content and the biological activity of honey samples.

Al-Mamary M., Al-Meeri A., Al-Habori M. (2002): Antioxidant activities and total phenolics of different types of honey. Nutrition Research, 22: 1041–1047.
Benzie I.F., Strain J.J. (1999): Ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay: Direct measure of total antioxidant activity of biological fluids and modified version for simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascorbic acid concentration. Methods in Enzymology, 299: 15–27.
Bertoncelj J., Doberšek U., Jamnik M., Golob T. (2007): Evaluation of the phenolic content, antioxidant activity and colour of Slovenian honey. Food Chemistry, 105: 822–828
Ecem-Bayram N., Yüzer M.O., Bayram S. (2019): Melissopalynology analysis, physicochemical properties, multi-element content and antimicrobial activity of honey samples collected from Bayburt, Turkey. Uludag Bee Journal, 19: 161–176.
Kaygusuz H., Tezcan F., Erim F.B., Yildiz O., Sahin H., Can Z., Kolaylı S. (2016): Characterization of Anatolian honeys based on minerals, bioactive components and principal component analysis. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 68: 273–279.
Keskin Ş., Mayda N., Keskin M., Özkök A. (2020): Investigation of Bilecik honeys in terms of melissopalynology and chemical analyses. Gıda (The Journal of Food), 45: 275–289.
Kolaylı S., Palabiyik I., Atik D.S., Keskin M., Bozdeveci A., Karaoglu S.A. (2020): Comparison of antibacterial and antifungal effects of different varieties of honey and propolis samples. Acta Alimentaria, 49: 515–523.
Krpan M., Marković K., ŠariĆ G., Skoko B., Hruškar M., Vahčić N. (2009): Antioxidant activities and total phenolics of acacia honey. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 27: 245–247.
Louveaux J., Maurizio A., Vorwohl G. (1978): Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World, 59: 139–157.
Malkoç M., Kara Y., Özkök A., Ertürk Ö., Kolaylı S. (2019): Characteristic properties of Jerusalem thorn (Paliurus spina-christi Mill.) honey. Uludag Bee Journal, 19: 69–81.
Mayda N., Keskin M., Keskin Ş., Özkök A. (2019): Determination of botanic origins, total phenolic and flavonoid contents of bee pollen collected from the Bilecik province. Uludag Bee Journal, 19: 152–160.
Mayda N., Özkök A. (2021): Determination and comparison of melissopalynological and some chemical characters of raw and processed honeys. Progress in Nutrition, 23: e2021240.
Meda A., Lamien C.E., Romito M., Millogo J., Nacoulma O.G. (2005). Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Fasan honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity. Food Chemistry, 91: 571–577.
Osés S.M., Pascual-Maté A., de la Fuente D., de Pablo A., Fernández-Muiño M.A., Sancho M.T. (2016): Comparison of methods to determine antibacterial activity of honeys against Staphylococcus aureus. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 78: 29–33.
Özkök A. (2019): Determination of antioxidant capacities, chemical composition and melissopalynological characterization of Verbascum spp. and Euphorbia spp. honeys. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28: 2644–2649.
Wodehouse R.P. (1935): Pollen Grains. New York, USA, McGraw-Hill: 106–109.
Sarı E. (2014): Determination of some biological and physicochemical properties of honey produced in Turkey. (Türkiye'de üretilen bazı balların biyolojik ve fizikokimyasal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi) [Ph.D. Thesis.] Kayseri, Turkey, Erciyes University, Institute of Science, Department of Biology. (in Turkish).
Sherlock O., Dolan A., Athman R., Power A., Gethin G., Cowman S., Humphreys H. (2010): Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of Ulmo honey from Chile and Manuka honey against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 10: 47
Singleton V.L., Rossi J.A. (1965): Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16: 144–158.
Singleton V.L., Orthofer R., Lamuela-Raventós R.M. (1999): Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods in Enzymology, 299: 152–178.
Zarei M., Fazlara A., Tulabifard N. (2019): Effect of thermal treatment on physicochemical and antioxidant properties of honey. Heliyon, 5: 01894.
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti