Morphological characterization and turf performance of Paula hard fescue and Casero colonial bentgrass selections under low maintenance conditions
J.A. Oliveira Prendes, P. Palenciahttps://doi.org/10.17221/78/2015-CJGPBCitation:Oliveira Prendes J.A., Palencia P. (2015): Morphological characterization and turf performance of Paula hard fescue and Casero colonial bentgrass selections under low maintenance conditions. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 51: 117-122.
Planting grasses that require low maintenance is a good option for reducing the management input required. The objective of this study was to obtain information about turfgrass characteristics based on spaced-plant characterization and turf performance in turf plots of two selections (Paula hard fescue and Casero colonial bentgrass) recently released for public distribution by the Plant Production Area of the University of Oviedo. The plants were grown under conditions of no irrigation, no fertilizer, no pesticide application and minimal mowing over a 3-year period (2012–2014). The following morphological measurements were done in a spaced-plant nursery: heading date, plant height, inflorescence length and flag leaf length and width. The turf plots were evaluated for several traits including overall turfgrass quality (turf score), leaf texture and genetic colour. In both the spaced-plant nursery and turf trials, hard fescue genotypes displayed better morphological characteristics (narrow leaves, reduced plant height) and performed better (overall high turfgrass quality, fine leaf texture, dark green colour) than bentgrass genotypes under conditions of low maintenance. For areas in which climate, soil characteristics and management conditions are similar to those encountered in this trial, the selection of Paula hard fescue is recommended for use in low-maintenance turf settings because of the good turfgrass performance and morphological characteristics of this selection.Keywords:Agrostis; Festuca; spaced-plant nursery; turf plotsReferences:
Bean E. W. (1970): Genotypic variation in inflorescence length in Phleum pratense. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 75, 169- https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600026174Buondonno A., Coppola E., Felleca D., Violante P. (1992): Comparing tests for soil fertility: 1. Conversion equations between olsen and mehlich 3 as phosphorus extractants for 120 soils of south italy 1. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 23, 699-716 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629209368620Corkill L., Rumball W. (1980): Problems of amenity grass seed production in New Zealand. In: Lancashire J.A. (ed.): Herbage Seed Production Grassland Research and Practice. Series No. 1, Dunedin, NZ Grassland Association Inc.: 26–30.Díaz González T.E., Fernández Prieto J.A. (1994): The vegetation of Asturias. Itinera Geobotanica, 8: 5–242. (in Spanish)Hazard Laurent, Betin Michèle, Molinari Nicolas (2006): Correlated Response in Plant Height and Heading Date to Selection in Perennial Ryegrass Populations. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1384- https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0115Junta de Extremadura (1992): Interpretation of Soil Analysis, Foliar and Irrigation Water. Fertilizer Recommendations (Basic Rules). Madrid, Mundi-Prensa. (in Spanish)Koski T. (2011): Turfgrass species selection guidelines. CMG Garden Notes No. 561. Available at http://www.ext.colostate.edu/mg/gardennotes/561.html (accessed April 15, 2015).McKernan D.K., Ross J.B., Tompkins D.K. (2001): Evaluation of grasses grown under low maintenance conditions. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 9: 25–32.Monyo J. H., Whittington W. J. (1973): Genotypic differences in flag leaf area and their contribution to grain yield in wheat. Euphytica, 22, 600-606 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036661Moss M. A. (1987): Environmental Conditions Conducive to Infection of Ryegrass by Pyricularia grisea. Phytopathology, 77, 863- https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-77-863NTEP (1998): National Turfgrass Evaluation Workbook. National Turfgrass Evaluation Program/Beltsville Agric. Center-West, Beltsville, Maryland.Oliveira J.A., Mayor M., González E. (2001): Bluegrasses, bentgrasses and fine fescues. Agricultura, 828: 432–436. (in Spanish)Oliveira J.A., Novo Uzal E., Pomar F., Bughrara S.S., Afif E. (2010): Agromorphological characterization and dollar spot fungus susceptibility in accessions of common bent (Agrostis capillaris L.) collected in Northern Spain. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, 56- https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2010081-1143. Razia Riaz, . Muhammad Aslam Chowdhry (2003): Genetic Analysis of Some Economic Traits of Wheat under Drought Condition. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2, 790-796 https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2003.790.796SPSS (2013): SPSS for Windows, Version 22. Chicago, SPSS Inc.Stukonis V., Lemežienè N., Kanapeckas J. (2010): Suitability of narrow-leaved Festuca species for turf. Agronomy Research 8 (Special Issue III): 729–734.Svobodová M., Martinek J., Králíčková T., Našinec I., Šantrůček J. (2013): Competition ability of selected amenity varieties of Festuca rubra in mixture with Deschampsia caespitosa. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 49: 70–76.Turgeon A.J. (1999): Turfgrass Management. 5th Ed., Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.Tyler B.F., Chorlton K.H., Thomas I.D. (1987): Preliminary screening of forage grasses. In: Tyler B.F. (ed.): Collection, Characterization and Utilization of Genetic Resources of Temperate Forage Grass and Clover. Lectures given at the Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth for an IBPGR, ECP/GR Short Course, October, 1984, IBPGR Training Course: Lecture Series I, International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome: 13–17.UPOV (1990): Guidelines for the Conduct of Tests for Distinctness, Homogeneity and Stability: Agrostis spp., UPOV, Geneva.UPOV (2006): Guidelines for the Conduct of Tests for Distinctness, Homogeneity and Stability: Red Fescue, Sheep’s Fescue, Hair Fescue, Reliant Hard Fescue, Shade Fescue, Pseudovina. UPOV, Geneva.