The results of consumer preference testing of popular apple cultivars at the end of the storage seasonžek J., Paprštein F., Zelený L., Křelinová J. (2019): The results of consumer preference testing of popular apple cultivars at the end of the storage season . Hort. Sci. (Prague), 46: 115-122.
download PDF

The results from 23 tasting sessions of experienced evaluators that took place during the last decade in May are presented in 4 periods which lasted 5 years except for the first one, which was seven-years long. The winner of the first testing period was ‘Bohemia’, ‘Meteor’ was the winner of the second period and ‘Admiral’ was the top rated in the remaining two testing periods. Across all the years, ‘Meteor’ had the highest total punctual value, but it was only about 0.4 points higher than ‘Admiral’. In the next sequence, they were followed by the cultivars ‘Andera’, ‘Rubin’ and ‘Andego’. In the aroma evaluation, ‘Andera’, ‘Gold Bohemia’ and ‘Topaz’ were the best. ‘Admiral’, ‘Gold Bohemia’ and ‘Andera’ were the top rated in flesh consistency. ‘Admiral’, ‘Angold’ and ‘Andera’ were the best in juiciness. ‘Gold Bohemia’, ‘Admiral’ and ‘Meteor’ had the highest values of the general taste. ‘Admiral’, ‘Angold’ and ‘Meteor’ were the most attractive. 

Amyotte B., Bowen A.J., Banks T., Rajcan I., Somers D.J. (2017): Mapping the sensory perception of apple using descriptive sensory evaluation in a genome wide association study. PLoS ONE 12: e0171710.
Anonymous (2014): Best of the best tasting apple varieties. Posted by scottfsmith 6B/7A MD (My Page) on Wed, July 16th.
Blažek J. (2007): Orchard performance and fruit quality of 50 apple cultivars grown or tested in commercial orchards of the Czech Republic. Horticultural Science (Prague), 34: 96–106.
Blažek J., Křelinová J. (2013): Organoleptické hodnocení jablek na konci skladovací sezóny (Organoleptic evaluation of apples at the end of storage season). Zahradnictví, 12: 14–15.
Blažek J., Paprštein F. (1999): Organoleptické posuzování pozdně skladovatelných jablek v Holovousích (Sensory evaluation of late storable apples at Holovousy). Zahradnictví, 8: 6–7.
Blažek J., Paprštein F. (2012): Výsledky organoleptického hodnocení skladovatelných jablek konaného v Holovousích (Results from sensory evaluation of storable apples held at Holovousy). Zahradnictví, 11: 14–15.
Blažek J., Paprštein F. (2014): Development of fruit quality within top apple cultivars based on Site consumer preference testing in last 34 years. Horticultural Science (Prague), 41: 10–18.
Blažek J., Paprštein F., Křelinová J. (2016): Výsledky ochutnávky jablek na konci skladovací sezóny v roce 2016 (Results of apple tasting at the end of the storage season in 2016). Zahradnictví, 15: 16–18.
Blažek J., Paprštein F., Zelený L., Křelinová J. (2015): Results of public tastings of apple novelties at the end of the storage seasons during the last 10 years. Horticultural Science (Prague), 42: 53–60.
Cliff M., Stanich S., Lub R., Hampson C. R. (2016): Use of descriptive analysis and preference mapping for early-stage assessment of new and established apples. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 96: 2170–2183.
Corollaro M.L., Endrizzi I., Bertolini A., Aprea E., Dematte L., Costa F. (2013): Sensory profiling of apple: Methodological aspects, cultivar characterisation and postharvest changes. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 11: 111–120.
Fenko A., Schifferstein H.N.J., Hekkert P. (2010): Shifts in sensory dominance between various stages of user-product interactions. Applied Ergonomics, 41: 34–40.
Goddrie P.D. (1982): Kleur en smaak van Jonagold. Fruitteelt, 72: 1314–1316.
Harker F.R., Amos R.L., Echeverria G., Gunson A. (2006); Influence of texture on taste: insights gained during studies of hardness, juiciness, and sweetness of apple fruit. Journal of Food Science, 71: 577–582.
Harker F.R., Kupferman E.M., Marin A.B., Gunson F.A., Triggs C.M. (2008): Eating quality standards for apples based on consumer preferences. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 50: 70–78.
Herrick C. (2014): Midwest apple improvement association eyes next steps. American Western Fruit Grower, 28–32.
Jamba E. (2007): Quality and preservation coordinates of some apple tree varieties introduced in the Republic of Moldova. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova, 40: 61–65.
Murray J.M., Delahunty C.M., Baxter I.A. (2001): Descriptive sensory analysis: past, present, future. Food Research International, 34: 461–471.
Paprštein F., Blažek J., Michálek S. (2006): Effects of climatic conditions on fruit quality of apple cultivars assessed by public sensory evaluations in the Czech and Slovak republics 1999–2004. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 14 (Suppl. 2): 219–227.
Piestrzeniewicz C. Sadowski A., Dziuban R. (2006): Performance of ‘Rubin’ apple trees on nineteen rootstocks after four years. Latvian Journal of Agronomy, 9: 98–102.
Sadok I.B., Tiecher A., Galvez-Lope D., Lahave M., Lasserre-Zuber P., Bruneau M., Hanteville S., Robic R., Cournol R., Laurens F. (2015): Apple fruit texture QTLs: year and cold storage effects on sensory and instrumental traits. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 11: 119.
Scarano J.V. (2014): Food: Taste Test – 25 Apple varieties at farmers market. Falls Church Times, Falls Church City’s Online Community Newspaper. Thursday, July 17, 2014.
Seppa L., Latvala T., Akaichi F., Gil J.M., Tuorila H. (2015): What are domestic apples worth? Hedonic responses and sensory information as drivers of willingness to pay. Food Quality and Preference, 43: 97–105.
Yue C., Tong C. (2011): Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for existing and new apple varieties: Evidence from apple tasting choice experiments. HortTechnology, 21: 276–383.
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti