Minimal morphoagronomic descriptors for Cuban pineapple germplasm characterisation

https://doi.org/10.17221/27/2019-HORTSCICitation:Rodriguez-Alfonso D., Isidron-Perez M., Barrios O., Fundora Z., Hormaza J.I., Grajal-Martin M.J., Herrera-Isidron L. (2020): Minimal morphoagronomic descriptors for Cuban pineapple germplasm characterisation. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 47: 28-35.
download PDF

A set of minimum descriptors allow for the rapid characterisation of germplasm facilitating the conservation and use of plant material. The objective of this work was to establish a list of minimum descriptors to facilitate the morphological characterisation of the ex situ pineapple collection in Cuba. Therefore, 48 pineapple accessions were characterised according to the morphoagronomic descriptors established by the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR). The data were processed by Multivariate Analysis, where a Multiple Principal Components Analysis was used for the qualitative and quantitative traits. A list with 14 minimum descriptors was proposed. The leaf’s colour, the thickness of the longest leaf, the distribution of the spines, the fruit shape, the fruit colour when ripe, the flesh colour, the weight of fruit flesh, eye form, the fruit height, the fruit diameter, the fruitlet shape, the core diameter, the total soluble solids of the fruit, and the crown weight/fruit weight ratio were selected as the minimum descriptors. Because most of the descriptors refer to the pineapple’s genetic improvement or commercialisation aspects, it could be a useful tool for scientists and producers.

References:
Bartholomew D., Coppens d‘Eeckenbrugge G., Ching-Cheng C. (2010): Pineapple. HortScience, 45: 740–742.
 
Bartholomew D.P., Hawkins R.A., Lopez J.A. (2012): Hawaii pineapple: The rise and fall of an industry. HortScience, 47: 1390–1398. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.47.10.1390
 
Coppens d´Eeckenbrugge G., Duval M.F. (1995): Bases genéticas para definir una estrategia del mejoramiento de la piña. Revista Facultad de Agronomía, 21: 95–118.
 
Coppens d‘Eeckenbrugge G., Govaerts R. (2015): Synonymies in Ananas (Bromeliaceae). Phytotaxa, 239: 273–279. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.239.3.8
 
Delgado-Huertas H., Arango-Weisner L. (2015): Caracterización morfoagronómica de genotipos de piña (Ananas spp.) en un suelo de terraza alta de Villavicencio. Orinoquia, 19: 153–165. https://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.315
 
Duval M.F., Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge G. (1993): Genetic variability in the genus Ananas. Acta Horticulturae, 334: 27–37.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.334.2
 
Duval M.F., Coppens d‘Eeckenbrugge G., Ferreira, F.R., Bianchetti L.B., Cabral J.R.S. (1997): First results from joint EMBRAPA-CIRAD Ananas Germplasm Collecting in Brazil and French Guyana. Acta Horticulturae, 425: 137–144. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.425.14
 
Fournier P., Soler A., Marie-Alphonsine P.A. (2007): Growth Characteristics of the Pineapple Cultivars ‘MD2’ and ‘Flhoran 41’ compared with ‘Smooth Cayenne’. Pineapple News, 14: 18–20.
 
Hammer O., Harper D.A., Ryan P.D. (2001): PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontología Electrónica, 4: 1–9.
 
IBPGR (1991): Descriptors for pineapple. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. Rome, Italy: 1–41.
 
Isidrón M. (2008): Formulario de descripción varietal para piña (Ananas comosus (L.) (Merril). Registro de Variedades Comerciales (Variety description form for pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) (Merril). Registration of Commercial Varieties, Ministerio de Agricultura. Cuba: 1–6.
 
Jolliffe I.T. (1973): Discarding variables in a principal component analysis. II: real data. Applied Statistics, 22: 21–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346300
 
Kinjo K. (1993): Inheritance of leaf margin spine in pineapple. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 334: 59–66. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.334.6
 
Leal F. (1990): Complemento a la clave para la identificación de las variedades comerciales de piña Ananas comosus L. Merrill. (Complement to the key for the identification of commercial pineapple varieties Ananas comosus L. Merrill). Revista Facultad de Agronomía, Maracay, 16: 1–11.
 
Morales M.M, Murillo C.M, Morales AC. (2015): In-vitro conservation: a perspective for the management of phytogenetic resources. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, Bogota, 6: 67–81.
 
O’Donnell K., Sharrock S. (2018): Botanic gardens complement agricultural gene bank in collecting and conserving plant genetic diversity. In: Biopreservation and Biobanking. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 16: 384–390.
 
Paez M.E. (1998): Caracterización morfológica de especies silvestres de Ananas spp. (Morphological characterization of wild species of Ananas spp.). Proceedings of the Interamerican Society for Tropical Horticulture, 42: 128–132.
 
Py C., Lacoeuilhe J., Teisson C. (1987): The pineapple: Cultivation and uses. Maisonneuve & Larose, Paris.
 
Ruiz V.C., Olán M., Espitia E., Sangerman-Jarquín D., Hernández J.M., Schwentesius R. (2013): Qualitative and quantitative variability determined through morphological characterization in amaranth accessions. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 4: 789–801.
 
Santos C.W.R., Ferreira F.R. (1999): Characterization and evaluation of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.) germplasm. Pineapple News, 6: 17.
 
Silva R.S., Moura E.F., Farias-Neto J.T., Ledo C.A.S., Sampaio J.E. (2017): Selection of morphoagronomic descriptors for the characterization of accessions of cassava of the Eastern Brazilian Amazon. Genetics and Molecular Research, 16: 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16029595
 
Silva W.C.J., Carvalho S.I., Duarte J.B. (2013): Identification of minimum descriptors for characterization of Capsicum spp. germplasm. Horticultura Brasileira, 31: 190–202.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362013000200004
 
Souza E.H., Duarte-Souza F.V., Pereira de Carvalho M.A., Silva-Costa Jr. D., Almeida-dos Santos-Serejo J., Amorim E.P., da Silva C.A. (2012): Genetic variation of the Ananas genus with ornamental potential. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution: 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9763-9
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences