Evaluation of pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars in Latvia
B. Lāce, G. Lācishttps://doi.org/10.17221/39/2014-HORTSCICitation:Lāce B., Lācis G. (2015): Evaluation of pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars in Latvia. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 42: 107-113.
Pears (Pyrus communis L.) are an important commercial crop in Latvia, ranked as a second most important fruit tree crop. The aim of this study was the choice of suitable new pear cultivars for growing in Latvia. The evaluation was carried out at the Latvia State Institute of Fruit-Growing. Eighteen cultivars were evaluated over six years. Flowering intensity, harvest date, average fruit weight, taste and chemical composition (total soluble solids, flesh firmness, titratable acidity (TA)) and resistance to diseases and pests were recorded. Flowering intensity showed significant differences among years: the highest was in 2009 and 2011, the lowest in 2007, but not among cultivars. The highest fruit weight (292 g) was detected for cv. Tavricheskaya, the high and stable fruit size for cv. Elektra. The best fruit qualities were produced by cvs Concorde, Condo and Conference. Stable and high content of soluble solids, high TA and fruit firmness were found in fruit of cv. Lyubimitsa Osennyaya. There were no cultivars resistant to European pear rust; the lowest susceptibility was detected for cv. Noyabrskaya (synonym Xenia), whereas cv. Talgarskaya Krasavitsa was resistant to sooty mould (caused by Leptoxyphium fumago) and cv. Smuglyanka – to pear leaf blister mite (Eriophyes pyri).Keywords:
phenology; flowering; fruit quality; disease resistance; pests; harvestReferences:
CSB (2011): Central Statistical Bureau, Latvia. Available at http://www.csb.gov.lv/enFischer M. (2005): Neue Pillnitzer Birnensorten. Obst & Garten, 11: 412–416.Fischer M., Weber H.J. (2005): Birnenanbau integriert und biologisch. Stuttgart, Eugen Ulmer.Heijerman-Peppelman G., Bucarciuc V., Kemp H., Pasat O. (2009): ‘Xenia’, a new pear cultivar from Moldova, first results in the Netherlands. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 814: 305–308.Höhne F. (2010): Erste Ergebnisse zu neuen Birnensorten aus Gülzow. Info-Blatt, 1: 11–21.Kappel F., Fisher-Fleming R.J., Hogue E. (1995): Ideal pear sensory attributes and fruit characteristics. HortScience, 30: 988–993.Kellerhals Markus, Szalatnay David, Hunziker Kaspar, Duffy Brion, Nybom Hilde, Ahmadi-Afzadi Masoud, Höfer Monika, Richter Klaus, Lateur Marc (2012): European pome fruit genetic resources evaluated for disease resistance. Trees, 26, 179-189 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0660-9Krasnova I., Karklina D., Seglina D., Juhnevica K., Heidemane G. (2010): The evaluation of sensory physical and chemical properties of pears grown in Latvia. In: Proceedings Research for rural development 2010. LLU, Jelgava, Latvia: 145–151.Paprštein F., Blažek J., Bouma J. (2009): New pear cultivars from the Czech Republic. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 814: 361–366.Paprstein F., Matejicek A., Sedlak J. (2013): New pear cultivars from the Czech Republic. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 976: 147–151.Petzold H. (1989): Birnensorten. Stuttgart, Eugen Ulmer.Prokopova B. (2011): The severity of European pear rust depending on pear cultivars. Sodininkyste ir darzininkyste, 30: 43–50.Ruess F. (2007): Erfahrungen mit neuen Birnensorten, -unterlagen und -bränden. Available at http://www.obstbau.rlp.de/Internet/global/themen.nsf/0/622472624e289287c12572d600483eec/$FILE/Seminarheft%20Kernobst%2011.pdfSkrīvele M., Kaufmane E., Strautiņa S., Ikase L., Ruisa S., Rubauskis E., Blukmanis M., Segliņa D. (2008): Fruit and berry growing in Latvia. In: Proceedings of international scientific conference Sustainable Fruit Growing: from Plant to Product. Jūrmala – Dobele: 5–4.Wawrazynczak A., Rutkowski K.P., Kruczynska D.E. (2006): Changes in Fruit quality in pears during CA storage. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 14: 77–84.