Evaluation of certain pomological and phenological traits of selected asian pear varieties growing in Middle European conditions

https://doi.org/10.17221/83/2019-HORTSCICitation:Nečas T., Wolf J., Kiss T., Gottingerová M., Ivo O., Bieniasz M. (2020): Evaluation of certain pomological and phenological traits of selected asian pear varieties growing in Middle European conditions. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 47: 81-92.
download PDF

The cultivation and breeding of new pear tree varieties have great potential, especially with the changing climate. The introduction of genetic resources and varieties from regions with a high genetic diversity can have a positive effect on the cultivation of pear trees in our region. In this experiment, a total of 23 Asian pear varieties originating from Japan and China were assessed. Based on the values obtained, the varieties were sorted, and suitable varieties for the conditions of the Czech Republic were selected. The early-maturing varieties that proved to be promising were ‘Shinseiki’ and ‘Zao Su Li’ due to their refreshing juiciness, plasticity and ease of cultivation. generally low demand. The ‘Shinseiki’ bears medium- to small-sized fruits (103 g on average). The size of the fruits of the evaluated cultivar ‘Zao Su Li’ can reach very large sizes (255 g on average). The medium-maturity varieties suitable for the conditions of the Czech Republic were ‘Hosui’ and ‘Dangshansu Li’ (ripening on the September 11–19 on average) and another interesting variety, ‘Kirgizkaja zimnaja’. Other suitable medium-maturity varieties are ‘Nijisseiki’, ‘Sha Li’ and ‘Pung Su’. Of the assessed late-maturing varieties, the promising ones were ‘Ya Li’ and ‘Mut Chen’, especially due to their relatively high storability under cold storage.

References:
Bell R.L. (1991): Pears (Pyrus). Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 290: 657–700. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1991.290.15
 
Bell R.L., Quamme H.A., Layne R.E.C., Skirvin R.M. (1996): Pears. In: Janick J., Moore J.N. (eds): Fruit Breeding, Volume I: Tree and Tropical Fruits, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 441–514.
 
Cao Y.F., Li S.L. Huang L.S. et al. (2000): Review of researches on the germplasm resources of pear trees in China. China Fruits, 4: 42–44.
 
Ertekin C., Gozlekci S., Kabas O., Sonmez S., Akinci I. (2006): Some physical, pomological and nutritional properties of two plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivars. Journal of Food Engineering, 75: 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.034
 
FAO (2018): Faostat – Food and Agricultural Organization. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home.
 
Hancock J.F., Lobos G.A. (2008): Pear. In: Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding, Germplasm to Genomics, Springer Science+Business Media: 299–335.
 
Hedrick U.P. (1921): The pears of New York. Albany: J.B. Lyon Co.
 
Jun W., Hongsheng G. (2002): The production of Asian pears in China. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 587: 71–80. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.587.4
 
Kappel F., Fisher-Fleming R.J., Hogue E. (1995): Ideal pear sensory attributes and fruit characteristics. HortScience, 30: 988–993. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.30.5.988
 
Khoshghalb H., Arzani K., Tavakoli A., Malakouti M.J., Barzegar M. (2008): Quality of some Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) fruit in relation to pre-harvest CaCl2, ZN and B sprays, harvest time, ripening and storage conditions. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 800: 1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.800.140
 
Kikuchi A. (1948): In: Horticulture of fruit trees, Vol. 1, Yokendo, Tokyo: 64–121.
 
Lāce B., Lācis G. (2015): Evaluation of pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars in Latvia. Horticultural Sciience (Prague), 42: 107–113. https://doi.org/10.17221/39/2014-HORTSCI
 
Mannig N. (2009): Physical, sensory and consumer analysis of pear genotypes among South African consumers and preference of appearance among European consumers. Stellenbosch University, Master of Science in Food Science, Stellenbosch University. http://scholar.sun.ac.za
 
Pekmezci M. (1983): Studies on the storage of lemon fruits (cv. Kütdiken). Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 138: 203–214. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1983.138.23
 
Shen T. (1980): Pears in China. HortScience, 15: 13–17.
 
Sosna I.S. (2018): Evaluation of several Asian pear cultivars in the climatic conditions of lower Silesia. Acta Scientarium Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 17: 107–114. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2018.1.10
 
Teng Y. (2004): Reconsideration on the origin of cultivated pears native to East Asia. Acta Horticiculturae (ISHS), 634: 175–182. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.634.21
 
Thibault B., Watkins R., Smith R.A. (1983): Descriptor list for Pear (Pyrus), CEC Secretariat, IBPGR, Rome.
 
Tvergyak P.J. (1985): Pear maturity indexes used to time harvest date. Post-Harvest Pomology Newsletter 3, No. 3.
 
UPOV (1994): Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability – Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm.f.) Nakai var. culta (Mak.) Nakai), TG/149/2, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva.
 
UPOV (2000): Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability – PEAR (Pyrus communis L.), TG/15/3, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva.
 
USDA (2019): Fresh Deciduous Fruit: World Markets and Trade (Apples, Grapes, & Pears). Available at https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/fruit.pdf
 
Vangdal E. (1980): Threshold values of soluble solids in fruit determined for the fresh fruit market. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 30: 445–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015128009435292
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences