Adaptability responses to drought stress in the oak species Quercus petraea growing on dry sites

https://doi.org/10.17221/123/2022-JFSCitation:

Nyamjav B. (2022): Adaptability responses to drought stress in the oak species Quercus petraea growing on dry sites. J. For. Sci., 68: 459–472.

download PDF

We studied sessile oak (Quercus petraea) growing on six dry sites to understand adaptability responses to drought stress. Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) on a moderately dry site was tested in parallel. We analyzed accessions from mostly dry sites that were less sensitive to soil drought and found that the growth performance ranking was not the same before and after treatment. We used phenological plasticity approaches to study seed development and plant development before and after drought: the treatments included stem length, root length, and collar diameter, as well as dry above- and below-ground biomass performance. Additionally, after drought treatment, osmolytes and root surface were tested in Q. petraea. According to the analyses and results, the ranked sites did not maintain their ranking status, with Q. petraea exhibiting different rates of growth during each developmental stage from seed development until the end of the treatment of plant material. The smallest seeds came from the driest site, which may indicate more adaptability to drought stress. After drought treatment, large differences were found between the dry biomass performance, stem length, root length, and collar diameter of oaks grown on different sites. The osmolality of Q. petraea on most of the dry sites was higher under the reduced treatment than under the optimal treatment, but not significantly. After drought treatment, all accessions – and especially those from the driest site – showed large differences in growth performance between the treatments. The relationship between seed weight and seedling development before and after drought treatment differed according to the developmental stage.

References:
Abrams M.D. (1990): Adaptations and responses to drought in Quercus species of North America. Tree Physiology, 7: 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/7.1-2-3-4.227
 
Arend M., Küster T., Günthardt-Goerg M.S., Dobbertin M. (2011): Provenance-specific growth responses to drought and air warming in three European oak species (Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Q. pubescens). Tree Physiology, 31: 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpr004
 
Bogdan S., Ivanković M., Temunović M., Morić M., Franjić J., Katičić Bogdan I. (2017): Adaptive genetic variability and differentiation of Croatian and Austrian Quercus robur L. populations at a drought-prone field trial. Annals of Forest Research, 60: 33–46. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2016.733
 
Bonfil C. (1998): The effects of seed size, cotyledon reserves and herbivory on seedling survival and growth in Quercus rugosa and Q. laurina (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany, 85: 79–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446557
 
Borucki Castro S.I., Phillip L.E., Lapierre H., Jardon P.W., Berthiaume R. (2008): The relative merit of ruminal undegradable protein from soybean meal or soluble fiber from beet pulp to improve nitrogen utilization in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 91: 3947–3957. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0638
 
Bruschi P. (2010): Geographical variation in morphology of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. as related to drought stress. Plant Biosystems, 144: 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263501003672462
 
Canadell J., Jackson R.B., Ehleringer J.R., Mooney H.A., Sala O.E., Schulze E.D. (1996): Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia, 108: 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329030
 
Collet C., Guehl J.M. (1997): Osmotic adjustment in sessile oak seedlings in response to drought. Annals of Forest Science, 54: 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19970406
 
Czajkowski T., Bolte A. (2006): Unterschiedliche Reaktion deutscher und polnischer Herkünfte der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) auf Trockenheit. Allgemeine Forst Jagd Zeitung, 177: 30–40. (in German)
 
Davidson S.R., Ashmore M.R., Garretty C. (1992): Effects of ozone and water deficit on the growth and physiology of Fagus sylvatica. Forest Ecology and Management, 51: 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90484-Q
 
Dickson R.E., Tomlinson P.T. (1996): Oak growth, development and carbon metabolism in response to water stress. Annals of Forest Science, 53: 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19960202
 
Ducousso A., Bordacs S. (2003): EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for Genetic Conservation and Use. Pedunculate and Sessile Oaks (Quercus robur/Quercus petraea). Rome, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: 6.
 
Eaton E., Caudullo G., Oliveira S. de Rigo D. (2016): Quercus robur and Quercus petraea in Europe: Distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J., de Rigo D., Caudullo G., Houston Durrant T., Mauri A. (eds.): European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxembourg, Publication Office of the European Union: 160–163.
 
Epron D., Dreyer E. (1990): Stomatal and nonstomatal limitation of photosynthesis by leaf water deficits in three oak species: A comparison of gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence data. Annals of Forest Science, 47: 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19900503
 
Epron D., Dreyer E. (1993): Long‐term effects of drought on photosynthesis of adult oak trees [Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L.] in a natural stand. New Phytologist, 125: 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03890.x
 
Fotelli M.N., Radoglou K.M., Constantinidou H.I. (2000): Water stress responses of seedlings of four Mediterranean oak species. Tree Physiology, 20: 1065–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.16.1065
 
Früchtenicht E., Klein N., Brüggemann W. (2018a): Response of Quercus robur and two potential climate change winners – Quercus pubescens and Quercus ilex – to two year’s summer drought in a semi-controlled competition study: II – Photosynthetic efficiency. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 152: 118–127.
 
Früchtenicht E., Neumann L., Klein N., Bonal D., Brüggemann W. (2018b): Response of Quercus robur and two potential climate change winners – Quercus pubescens and Quercus ilex – to two year’s summer drought in a semi-controlled competition study: I – Tree water status. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 152: 107–117.
 
Früchtenicht E., Bock J., Feucht V., Brügemann W. (2021): Reactions of three European oak species (Q. robur, Q. petraea and Q. ilex) to repetitive summer drought in sandy soil. Trees, Forest and People, 5: 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100093
 
Gallé A., Haldimann P., Feller U. (2007): Photosynthetic performance and water relations in young pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens) trees during drought stress and recovery. New Phytologist, 174: 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02047.x
 
Götmark F. (2013): Habitat management alternatives for conservation forests in the temperate zone: Review, synthesis, and implications. Forest Ecological Management, 306: 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.014
 
Hamanishi E.T., Campbell M.M. (2011): Genome-wide responses to drought in forest trees. Forestry, 84: 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpr012
 
Herzog S., Krabel D. (1999): Genetic structure of a flooded and a non-flooded oak (Quercus robur) population from the floodplains of the Rhein River. Ekológia (Bratislava), 18: 160–163.
 
Jones E.W. (1959): Quercus L. Journal of Ecology, 47: 169–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2257253
 
Koslowski T.T. (1982): Water supply and tree growth. Part I. Water deficit. Forestry Abstracts, 43: 57–95.
 
Kuster T.M., Schleppi P., Hu B., Schulin R., Günthardt-Goerg M.S. (2013): Nitrogen dynamics in oak model ecosystems subjected to air warming and drought on two different soils. Plant Biology, 15: 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00686.x
 
Leiva M.J., Fernández-Alés R. (1998): Variability in seedling water status during drought within a Quercus ilex subsp. ballota population, and its relation to seedling morphology. Forest Ecology and Management, 111: 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00320-X
 
Leuschner C., Ellenberg H. (2017): Ecology of Central European Forests: Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. Volume I. Cham, Springer: 971.
 
Leuschner C., Backes K., Hertel D., Schipka F., Schmitt U., Terborg O., Runge M. (2001): Drought responses at leaf, stem and fine root levels of competitive Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. trees in dry and wet years. Forest Ecology and Management, 149: 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00543-0
 
Leuzinger S., Zotz G., Asshoff R., Körner C. (2005): Responses of deciduous forest trees to severe drought in Central Europe. Tree Physiology, 25: 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.6.641
 
Löf M., Bruner J., Filyushkina A., Lindbladh M., Skovsgaard J.P., Felton A. (2016): Management of oak forest: Striking a balance between timber production, biodiversity and cultural services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 12: 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2015.1120780
 
Lombardini L. (2006): Ecophysiology of plants in dry environments. In: D’Odorico P., Porporato A. (eds.): Dryland Ecohydrology. Dordrecht, Springer: 47–65.
 
Long T.J., Jones R.H. (1996): Seedling growth strategies and seed size effects in fourteen oak species native to different soil moisture habitats. Trees, 11: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004680050051
 
McCormack M.L., Dickie I.A., Eissenstat D.M., Fahey T.J., Fernandez C.W., Guo D., Helmisaari H.S., Hobbie E.A., Iversen C.M., Jackson R.B., Leppälammi-Kujansuu J., Norby R.J., Phillips R.P., Pregitzer K.S., Pritchard S.G., Rewald B., Zadworny M. (2015): Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytologist, 207: 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13363
 
McShea W.J., Healy W.M., Devers P., Fearer T., Koch F.H., Stauffer D., Waldon J. (2007): Forestry matters: Decline of oaks will impact wildlife in hardwood forests. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71: 1717–1728. https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-169
 
Mitchell Aide T., Zimmerman J.K., Pascarella J.B., Rivera L., Marcano-Vega H. (2001): Forest regeneration in a chronosequence of tropical abandoned pastures: Implications for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 8: 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80048.x
 
Mölder A., Meyer P., Nagel R.V. (2019): Integrative management to sustain biodiversity and ecological continuity in central European temperature oak (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) forests: An overview. Forest Ecology and Management, 437: 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.006
 
Nardini A., Pitt F. (1999): Drought resistance of Quercus pubescens as a function of root hydraulic conductance, xylem embolism and hydraulic architecture. The New Phytologyst, 143: 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00476.x
 
Oren R., Pataki D.E. (2001): Transpiration in response to variation in microclimate and soil moisture in southeastern deciduous forests. Oecologia, 127: 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000622
 
Pérez-Ramos I.M., Gomez-Aparicio L., Villar R., García L.V., Maranon T. (2010): Seedling growth and morphology of three oak species along field resource gradients and seed mass variation: A seedling age-dependent response. Journal of Vegetation Science, 21: 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01165.x
 
Ponton S., Dupouey J.L., Bréda N., Dreyer E. (2002): Comparison of water-use efficiency of two sympatric oak species: Genotype × environment interactions. Tree Physiology, 22: 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.6.413
 
Praciak A. (2013): The CABI Encyclopedia of Forest Trees. Wallingford, CABI: 523.
 
Pretzsch H., Bielak K., Block J., Bruchwald A., Dieler J., Ehrhart H.P., Kohnle U., Nagel J., Spellmann H., Zasada M., Zingg A. (2013): Productivity of mixed versus pure stands of oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) along an ecological gradient. European Journal of Forest Research, 132: 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0673-y
 
Quero J.L., Villar R., Marañón T., Zamora R., Poorter L. (2007): Seed-mass effects in four Mediterranean Quercus species (Fagaceae) growing in contrasting light environments. American Journal of Botany, 94: 1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.11.1795
 
Quero J.L., Villar R., Marañón T., Zamora R., Vega D., Sack L. (2008): Relating leaf photosynthetic rate to whole-plant growth: Drought and shade effects on seedlings of four Quercus species. Functional Ecology, 35: 725–737.
 
Rose L., Leuschner C., Köckemann B., Buschmann H. (2009): Are marginal beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) provenances a source for drought tolerant ecotypes? European Journal of Forest Research, 128: 335–343.
 
Savill P. (2013): The silviculture of trees used in British forestry. 2nd Ed. Wallingford, CABI: 280.
 
Saxe H., Cannell M.G.R., Johnsen O., Ryan M.G., Vourlitis G. (2001): Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. New Phytologist, 149: 369–399. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00057.x
 
Thomas F.M., Gausling T. (2000): Morphological and physiological responses of oak seedlings (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) to moderate drought. Annals of Forest Science, 57: 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2000123
 
Thomas F.M., Blank R., Hartmann G. (2002): Abiotic and biotic factors and their interactions as causes of oak decline in Central Europe. Forest Pathology, 32: 277–307. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0329.2002.00291.x
 
Turcsán A., Steppe K., Sárközi E., Erdélyi É., Missoorten M., Mees G., Vander Mijnsbrugge K. (2016): Early summer drought stress during the first growing year stimulates extra shoot growth in oak seedlings (Quercus petraea). Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00193
 
Vander Mijinsbrugge K., Turcsán A., Maes J., Duchêne N., Meeus S., Van der Aa B., Steppe K. Steenackers M. (2017): Taxon-independent and taxon-dependent responses to drought in seedlings from Quercus robur L., Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and their morphological intermediates. Forests, 8: 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110407
 
Vander Mijnsbrugge K., Turcsán A., Erdély É., Beeckmann H. (2020): Drought treated seedlings of Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Q robur L. and their morphological intermediates show differential radial growth and wood anatomical traits. Forests 11: 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11020250
 
Van Hees A.F.M. (1997): Growth and morphology of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings in relation to shading and drought. Annals of Forest Science, 54: 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19970102
 
Vivin P., Aussenac G., Levy G. (1993): Differences in drought resistance among three deciduous oak species grown in large boxes. Annals of Forest Science, 50: 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19930301
 
Wilmanns O. (1990): Planzen prägen Lebensräume. Die Rotbuche, Fagus sylvatica L. Biologie in Unserer Zeit, 20: 60–62. (in German)
 
Zanetto A., Roussel G., Kremer A. (1994): Geographic variation of inter-specific differentiation between Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Forest Genetics, 1: 111–123.
 
Zweifel R., Zimmermann L., Newbery D.M. (2005): Modeling tree water deficit from microclimate: An approach to quantifying drought stress. Tree Physiology, 25: 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.2.147
 
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti