Forest certification as a tool to support sustainable development in forest managementá A., Hájek M., Štěpánková M., Ševčík M. (2015): Forest certification as a tool to support sustainable development in forest management. J. For. Sci., 61: 359-368.
download PDF
The concept of sustainable development is currently known and used in many contexts across a wide range of industries. Nevertheless, specific approaches to achieving the strategy of sustainability can be found in the individual sectors. The beginnings of sustainable management in forestry go back to the mid-18th century. Currently, certification systems contribute to sustainable behaviour in forests. In the Czech Republic, this concerns in particular PEFC and FSC certification systems. Both these certification systems include two different processes, forest management certification and chain of custody certification, i.e. including the wood-processing companies, where only certified wood must strictly be used. This article aims to evaluate the importance of certification for sustainable development in forestry. Given the clear superiority of the PEFC system in the Czech Republic, this paper focuses on the potential benefits for PEFC certificate holders. To determine the benefits of PEFC certification for sustainable development, a questionnaire survey was chosen. Assessment of the benefits for sustainable development depends on the subjective assessment of certification holders. The results suggest that the beneficial effect on sustainable development in forest management is clear in the forest property area of over 500 ha. 
Bloomfield M.J. (2012): Is forest certification a hegemonic force? Journal of Environment & Development, 21: 391–413.
Bowers John (2005): Instrument choice for sustainable development: an application to the forestry sector. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 97-107
Brundtland G.H. (1991): Naše společná budoucnost. Zpráva Světové komise pro životní prostředí a rozvoj. Praha, Academia: 297.
Cashore B., Auld G.A., Newsom D. (2004): Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 327.
Cashore Benjamin, van Kooten G.Cornelis, Vertinsky Ilan, Auld Graeme, Affolderbach Julia (2005): Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 53-69
Chen Juan, Innes John L. (2013): The implications of new forest tenure reforms and forestry property markets for sustainable forest management and forest certification in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 206-215
Chráska M. (2007): Metody pedagogického výzkumu. Praha, Grada: 55.
Cubbage Frederick, Diaz Diana, Yapura Pablo, Dube Francis (2010): Impacts of forest management certification in Argentina and Chile. Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 497-504
Dimitrov Radoslav S. (2005): Hostage to Norms: States, Institutions and Global Forest Politics. Global Environmental Politics, 5, 1-24
Ebner D., Baumgartner R. (2006): The Relationship between Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Corporate Responsibility Research Conference, Dublin, Sept 4–5, 2006: 1–17.
FSC (2009): FSC Česká republika. Available at (accessed Feb 04, 2015).
Georgiadis N. M., Cooper R. (): Development of a forest certification standard compatible with PEFC and FSC's management requirements. A case study from Greece. Forestry, 80, 113-135
Glavič Peter, Lukman Rebeka (2007): Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1875-1885
Gulbrandsen Lars H. (2005): The Effectiveness of Non-State Governance Schemes: A Comparative Study of Forest Certification in Norway and Sweden. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5, 125-149
Hasenauer H. (2006): Sustainable Forest Management. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer: 94.
Johansson Johanna, Lidestav Gun (2011): Can voluntary standards regulate forestry? — Assessing the environmental impacts of forest certification in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 191-198
Klein J. (2001): A Critique of Competitive Advantage. Available at (accessed Apr 24, 2014).
Lélé Sharachchandra M. (1991): Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19, 607-621
Maletz Olga, Tysiachniouk Maria (2009): The effect of expertise on the quality of forest standards implementation: The case of FSC forest certification in Russia. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 422-428
Overdevest C. (): Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Socio-Economic Review, 8, 47-76
PEFC (2014): PEFC International. Available at (accessed Feb 04, 2015).
PEFC (2015): PEFC: Caring for Our Forests Globally. Available at (accessed Feb 04, 2015).
Redclift Michael (2005): Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13, 212-227
Řeháková B. (1979): Statistické ovĕřování reprezentativity: testy dobré shody. Sociologický Časopis, 15: 615–629.
Schaltegger S., Wagner M. (2006): Managing and measuring the business case for sustainability. In: Schaltegger S., Wagner M. (eds): Managing the Business Case for Sustainability. The Integration of Social, Environmental and Economic Performance. 1st Ed. Sheffield, Greenleaf Publishing Ltd: 4.
Schlyter Peter, Stjernquist Ingrid, Bäckstrand Karin (2009): Not seeing the forest for the trees? The environmental effectiveness of forest certification in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 375-382
Sverdrup-Thygeson Anne, Borg Pia, Bergsaker Erling (2008): A comparison of biodiversity values in boreal forest regeneration areas before and after forest certification. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 236-243
van Kooten G. Cornelis, Nelson Harry W., Vertinsky Ilan (2005): Certification of sustainable forest management practices: a global perspective on why countries certify. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 857-867
Zázvorka P. (2007): Udržitelný rozvoj z hlediska historie. Available at (accessed Mar 15, 2014).
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti