Spatial and compositional structure of European oak urban forests in Kyiv city, Ukraine

https://doi.org/10.17221/173/2020-JFSCitation:

Matsala M., Bilous A., Feshchenko R., Matiashuk R., Bilous S., Kovbasa Y. (2021): Spatial and compositional structure of European oak urban forests in Kyiv city, Ukraine. J. For. Sci., 67: 143–153.

download PDF

Forest dimensional structure and tree species composition strictly define ecosystem resilience, success of its functioning and development. Spatial structure of forest compartments provides an additional information on the forest stand heterogeneity. The aim of this study is to examine structural patterns (both spatial and nonspatial ones) in European oak (Quercus robur L.) urban forests located in Kyiv city, Ukraine. We compared two middle-aged (~ 80 years) and two mature (~ 180 years) oak stands in terms of structural metrics collecting a data from geo-referenced trees on the established permanent sample plots. Younger stands reached similar tree diameter diversity (9.07 and 10.45 vs. 11.42 and 14.05 of Shannon indices), while the compositional diversity was driven by the dominance of either oak or European hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.). We have not found any differences in the species mingling and deadwood distribution indices except a clear occurrence pattern for the stand located near roads. Herewith, the largest distance between the plot and park pathways was an indicator of changed spatial variation and tree dimensional differentiation within one middle-aged stand. We hypothesize that human impacts can alter structural development in urban deciduous forests providing both positive (gap formation, deadwood occurrence and ecosystem complexity) and negative (shifts in compositional and successional trajectories) effects on such forest stands.

References:
Annighofer P., Beckschafer P., Vor T., Ammer C. (2015): Regeneration patterns of European oak species (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Quercus robur L.) in dependence of environment and neighborhood. PLoS One, 10: e0134935.
 
Aszalos R., Horvath F., Masza K., Odor P., Lengyel A., Kovasz G., Boloni J. (2017): First signs of old-growth structure and composition of an oak forest after four decades of abandonment. Biologia, 72: 1264–1274. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2017-0139
 
Bilous A., Matsala M., Radchenko V., Matiashuk R., Boiko S., Bilous S. (2019): Coarse woody debris in mature oak stands of Ukraine: carbon stock and decomposition features. Forestry Ideas, 25: 196–219.
 
Bouget C., Nussilard B., Pineau X., Ricou C. (2011): Effect of deadwood position on saproxylic beetles in temperate forests and conservation interest of oak snags. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 5: 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00160.x
 
Donato D.C., Campbell J.L., Franklin J.F. (2012): Multiple successional pathways and precocity in forest development: can some forests be born complex? Journal of Vegetation Science, 23: 576–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01362.x
 
Ebenberger M., Arnberger A. (2019): Exploring visual preferences for structural attributes of urban forest stands for restoration and heat relief. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41: 272–282.
 
Escobedo F.J., Giannico V., Jim C.Y., Sanesi G., Lafortezza R. (2019): Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 37: 3–12.
 
Grotti M., Chianucci F., Puletti N., Fardusi M.J., Castaldi C., Corona P. (2019): Spatio-temporal variability in structure and diversity in a semi-natural mixed oak-hornbeam floodplain forest. Ecological Indicators, 104: 576–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.014
 
Keeton W., Franklin J.F. (2005): Do remnant old-growth trees accelerate rates of succession in mature Douglas-fir forests? Ecological Monographs, 75: 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0626
 
Korhonen A., Siitonen J., Kotze D.J., Immonen A., Hamberg L. (2020): Stand characteristics and dead wood in urban forests: Potential biodiversity hotspots in managed boreal landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201: 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103855
 
Lorimer C.G., Halpin C.R. (2014): Classification and dynamics of developmental stages in late-successional temperate forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 334: 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.003
 
Margalef R. (1958): Information theory in ecology. General Systematics, 3: 36–71.
 
Molder A., Meyer P., Nagel R.-V. (2019): Integrative management to sustain biodiversity and ecological continuity in Central European temperate oak (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) forests: An overview. Forest Ecology and Management, 437: 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.006
 
Netsvetov M., Prokopuk Yu., Didukh Ya., Romenskyy M. (2018): Climatic sensitivity of Quercus robur L. in floodplain near Kyiv under river regulation. Dendrobiology, 79: 20–33. https://doi.org/10.12657/denbio.079.003
 
Netsvetov M., Prokopuk Yu., Puchalka R., Koprowski M., Klisz M., Romenskyy M. (2019): River regulation causes rapid changes in relationships between floodplain oak growth and environmental variables. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00096
 
Neumann M., Starlinger F. (2001): The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 145: 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00577-6
 
Pebesma E.J. (2004): Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Computers & Geosciences, 30: 683–691.
 
Pelyukh O., Paletto A., Zahvoyska L. (2019): People’s attitudes towards deadwood in forest: evidence from the Ukrainian Carpathians. Journal of Forest Science, 65: 171–182. https://doi.org/10.17221/144/2018-JFS
 
Petritan A.M., Biris I.A., Merce O., Turcu D.O., Petritan I.C. (2012): Structure and diversity of a natural temperate sessile oak (Quercus petraea L.) – European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 280: 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.007
 
Pielou E.C. (1975): Ecological Diversity. New York, Wiley: 165.
 
Pommerening A., Stoyan D. (2006): Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 1723–1739. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-060
 
Pommerening A., Uria-Diez J. (2017): Do large trees tend towards high species mingling? Ecological Informatics, 42: 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.009
 
Poldveer E., Korjus H., Kiviste A., Kangur A., Paluots T., Laarman D. (2019): Assessment of spatial stand structure of hemiboreal conifer dominated forests according to different levels of naturalness. Ecological Indicators, 110: 105944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105944
 
Oksanen J.F., Blanchet G., Friendly M., Kindt R., Legendre P., McGlinn D., Minchin P.R., O'Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Stevens M.H.H., Szoecs E. and Wagner H. (2019): Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.5–6. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
 
R Core Team (2019): R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.Rproject.org/
 
Reilly M.J., Spies T.A., Peters D.P.C. (2015): Regional variation in stand structure and development in forests of Oregon, Washington, and inland Northern California. Ecosphere, 6: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00469.1
 
Schepaschenko D., Chave J., Phillips O.L., Lewis S.L., Davies S.J., Réjou-Méchain M., Sist P., Scipal K., et al. (2019): The Forest Observation System, building a global reference dataset for remote sensing of forest biomass. Scientific Data, 6: 198. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0196-1
 
Shannon C.E. (1948): A mathematical theory of communications. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
 
Shvidenko A., Buksha I., Krakovska S., Lakyda P. (2017): Vulnerability of Ukrainian forests to climate change. Sustainability, 9: 1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071152
 
Thom D., Keeton W. (2019): Stand structure drives disparities in carbon storage in northern hardwood-conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 442: 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.053
 
Tinya F., Kovacs B., Prattala A., Farkas P., Aszalos R., Odor P. (2018): Initial understory response to experimental silvicultural treatments in a temperate oak-dominated forest. European Journal of Forest Research, 138: 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1154-8
 
Turner M.G., Gergel S.E., Dixon M.D., Miller J.R. (2004): Distribution and abundance of trees in floodplain forests of the Wisconsin River: environmental influences at different scales. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15: 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015[0729:DAAOTI]2.0.CO;2
 
Vacek S., Vacek Z., Bilek L., Hejcmanova P., Sticha V., Remes J. (2015): The dynamics and structure of dead wood in natural spruce-beech forest stand – a 40 year case study in the Krkonose National Park. Dendrobiology, 73: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.12657/denbio.073.003
 
Vacek Z., Vacek S., Bílek L., Král J., Ulbrichová I., Simon J., Bulušek D. (2018): Impact of applied silvicultural systems on spatial pattern of hornbeam-oak forests. Central European Forestry Journal, 64: 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/forj-2017-0031
 
Vasile D., Petritan A.M., Tudose N.C., Toiu F.L., Scarlatescu V., Petritan I.C. (2017): Structure and spatial distribution of dead wood in two temperate old-growth mixed European beech forests. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici ClujNapoca, 45: 639–645. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha45210829
 
Vitkova L., Bace R., Kjucukov P., Svoboda M. (2018): Deadwood management in Central European forests: Key considerations for practical implementation. Forest Ecology and Management, 429: 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.034
 
Von Oheimb G., Westphal C., Hardtle W. (2007): Diversity and spatio-temporal dynamics of dead wood in a temperate near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica). European Journal of Forest Research, 126: 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0152-4
 
Widerberg M.K., Ranius T., Drobyshev I., Nilsson U., Lindblath M. (2012): Increased openness around retained oaks increases species richness of saproxylic beetles. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21: 3035–3059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0353-8
 
Yarotskiy V.Y., Pasternak V.P., Nazarenko V.V. (2019): Deadwood in the oak forests of the Left Bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A – Forestry, 61: 247–254. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2019-0024
 
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti