Detection of the effects of management and physical factors on forest soil carbon stock variability in semiarid conditions using parametric and nonparametric methods
Y. Parvizi, M. Heshmatihttps://doi.org/10.17221/26/2015-JFSCitation:Parvizi Y., Heshmati M. (2015): Detection of the effects of management and physical factors on forest soil carbon stock variability in semiarid conditions using parametric and nonparametric methods. J. For. Sci., 61: 448-455.
Forest soils in western parts of Iran are being degraded by inappropriate management. The soil organic carbon (SOC) stock was dominantly affected by this type of degradation. On the other hand, SOC is an important sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide and can play a key role in global warming. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of 15 different physical and 8 different management factors on the SOC content and to determine relative importance of these exploratory variables for SOC estimation in a semiarid forest using multiple least-squares regression, tree-based model, and neural network model. Results showed that the CART model with all physical and management variables and 24-2-1 neural networks had the highest predictive ability that explained 81 and 76% of SOC variability, respectively. Neural network models slightly overestimate SOC content. ANNs have a higher ability to detect the effects of management variables on SOC variability and the advantage of CART was to distinguish the effects of physical variables. In both methods the management system dominantly controlled SOC variability in these semiarid forest conditions.Keywords:soil organic carbon; CART; modelling, neural networksReferences:
Amini M., Abbaspour K. C., Khademi H., Fathianpour N., Afyuni M., Schulin R. (2005): Neural network models to predict cation exchange capacity in arid regions of Iran. European Journal of Soil Science, 56, 551-559 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.0698.xBeers T.W., Dress P.E., Wensel L.C. (1966): Aspect transformation in site productivity research. Journal of Forestry, 64: 691–692.Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Olshen R.A., Stone C.J. (1984): Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, Wadsworth International Group: 368.Lal R (2002): Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environmental Pollution, 116, 353-362 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00211-1Lal Rattan (2010): Managing Soils and Ecosystems for Mitigating Anthropogenic Carbon Emissions and Advancing Global Food Security. BioScience, 60, 708-721 https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.9.8Liu Dianwei, Wang Zongming, Zhang Bai, Song Kaishan, Li Xiaoyan, Li Jianping, Li Fang, Duan Hongtao (2006): Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and analysis of related factors in croplands of the black soil region, Northeast China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 113, 73-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.006McBratney Alex B, Minasny Budiman, Cattle Stephen R, Vervoort R.Willem (2002): From pedotransfer functions to soil inference systems. Geoderma, 109, 41-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00139-8McCullagh J. (2005): Modular Neural Network Architecture for Rainfall Estimation, Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Innsbruck, Austria: 767–772.McVay K., Rice C. (2002): Soil Organic Carbon and the Global Carbon Cycle. Technical Report MF-2548. Manhattan, Kansas State University: 216–289.Omid M., Baharlooei A., Ahmadi H. (2009): Modeling Drying Kinetics of Pistachio Nuts with Multilayer Feed-Forward Neural Network. Drying Technology, 27, 1069-1077 https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930903218602Park S.J, Vlek P.L.G (2002): Environmental correlation of three-dimensional soil spatial variability: a comparison of three adaptive techniques. Geoderma, 109, 117-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00146-5Sarmadian F., Taghizadeh R., Mehrjardi R., Akbarzadeh A. (2009): Modeling of some soil properties using artificial neural network and multivariate regression in Gorgan province, north of Iran. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 3: 323–329.Somaratne S., Seneviratne G., Coomaraswamy U. (2005): Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon across Different Land-use Patterns. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 1580- https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.0293Sparks D.L. (1996): Methods of Soil Analysis. Soil Science Society of America Book Series, Vol. 5. Madison, Soil Science Society of America: 1264.Sparling G.P., Wheeler D., Wesely E.T., Schipper L.A. (2006): What is soil organic matter worth? Journal of Environment Quality, 35: 548–557.Spencer M.J., Whitfort T., McCullagh J. (2006): Dynamic ensemble approach for estimating organic carbon using computational intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IASTED International Conference on Advances in Computer Science and Technology. Puerto Vallarta, Jan 23–25, 2006, 186–192.Tan Zhengxi, Lal Rattan (2005): Carbon sequestration potential estimates with changes in land use and tillage practice in Ohio, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 111, 140-152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.05.012Tan Z., Lal R., Smeck N., Calhoun F. (2004): Relationships between surface soil organic carbon pool and site variables, Geoderma, 121: 187–195.Wang Limin, Li Xiaolin, Mao Yuting (2009): A Novel Approach of Multiple Submodel Integration Based on Decision Forest Construction. Modern Applied Science, 2, - https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v2n2p9Zhang G. (2004): Neural Networks in Business Forecasting. Hershey, IRM Press: 58–116.