International assessment of bioenergy stakeholders research requirements of GIS based biomass analytics B., Srivastava S., Ghaffariyan M. (2019): International assessment of bioenergy stakeholders research requirements of GIS based biomass analytics. J. For. Sci., 65: 234-246.
download PDF

As the demand and production for renewable energies increases there is a growing need to research new technologies to increase the efficiency, productivity and profitability of production. This study aimed to investigate the priorities of bioenergy stakeholders on Geographic Information Systems based research in a variety of countries including a number throughout Europe, the United States and Australia. A voluntary questionnaire was distributed internationally to bioenergy stakeholders to discern perceived usefulness ratings for various analytics. Participants rated Economic analytics as the most useful followed by Environmental, Product quality and Social assessments. Therefore, future research within the bioenergy sector should be aimed at increasing the economic viability of bioenergy and decreasing its environmental impact. There was a difference between analytic preference and the thirteen countries surveyed and the stakeholder type however, this relationship was not significant.

Baral A (2004): Trees for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution: the issue of cost vs. carbon benefit. Biomass and Bioenergy, 27, 41-55
Dale Virginia H., Kline Keith L., Richard Tom L., Karlen Douglas L., Belden William W. (2018): Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement. Biomass and Bioenergy, 114, 143-156
Delshad Ashlie B., Raymond Leigh, Sawicki Vanessa, Wegener Duane T. (2010): Public attitudes toward political and technological options for biofuels. Energy Policy, 38, 3414-3425
Dwivedi P., Alavalapati J.R.R. (2009): Stakeholders’ perceptions on forest biomass-based bioenergy development in the southern US. Energy Policy: 37, 1999–2007.
Fawzy Mostafa F., Componation Paul J. (2015): Biofuel Production: Utilizing Stakeholders’ Perspectives. Engineering Management Journal, 27, 85-96
Ghaffariyan M.R., Apolit R. (2015): Harvest residues assessment in pine plantations harvested by whole tree and cut-to-length harvesting methods (a case study in Queensland, Australia). Silva Balcanica, 16: 113–122.
Gowan Catherine H., Kar Shiba P., Townsend Patricia A. (2018): Landowners' perceptions of and interest in bioenergy crops: Exploring challenges and opportunities for growing poplar for bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 110, 57-62
IEA Bioenergy (2018): Is energy from woody biomass positive for the climate? Available at: July 27, 2018).
Kinoshita Tsuguki, Inoue Keisuke, Iwao Koki, Kagemoto Hiroshi, Yamagata Yoshiki (2009): A spatial evaluation of forest biomass usage using GIS. Applied Energy, 86, 1-8
Johnson Timothy Lawrence, Bielicki Jeffrey M., Dodder Rebecca S., Hilliard Michael R., Ozge Kaplan P., Andrew Miller C. (2013): Advancing Sustainable Bioenergy: Evolving Stakeholder Interests and the Relevance of Research. Environmental Management, 51, 339-353
Leitch Zachary J., Lhotka John M., Stainback G. Andrew, Stringer Jeffrey W. (2013): Private landowner intent to supply woody feedstock for bioenergy production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 56, 127-136
Lovett Andrew A., Sünnenberg Gisela M., Richter Goetz M., Dailey A. Gordon, Riche Andrew B., Karp Angela (2009): Land Use Implications of Increased Biomass Production Identified by GIS-Based Suitability and Yield Mapping for Miscanthus in England. BioEnergy Research, 2, 17-28
Noon Charles E., Daly Michael J. (1996): GIS-based biomass resource assessment with BRAVO. Biomass and Bioenergy, 10, 101-109
Radics Robert Istvan, Dasmohapatra Sudipta, Kelley Stephen (2015): Systematic Review of Bioenergy Perception Studies. BioResources, 10, -
Rosillo-Calle Frank (2016): A review of biomass energy - shortcomings and concerns. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 91, 1933-1945
Shakiba A. (2015): Assessing stakeholders’ interest in biofuels. [Ph.D. Thesis]. Ottawa, University of Ottawa: 144. Available at: (accessed August 1, 2018).
Sinkala T., Johnson F.X. (2017): Small-Scale Production of Jatropha in Zambia and its Implications for Rural Development and National Biofuel Policies. In: Janssen R., Rutz D. (eds): Bioenergy for sustainable development in Africa. Netherlands, Springer: 41–53.
Spartz James T., Rickenbach Mark, Shaw Bret R. (2015): Public perceptions of bioenergy and land use change: Comparing narrative frames of agriculture and forestry. Biomass and Bioenergy, 75, 1-10
Voivontas D., Assimacopoulos D., Koukios E.G. (2001): Aessessment of biomass potential for power production: a GIS based method. Biomass and Bioenergy, 20, 101-112
Wall J., Hardwood C.S., Demain A.L. (2008): Bioenergy. Washington, AMS Press: 454.
Viana H., Cohen Warren B., Lopes D., Aranha J. (2010): Assessment of forest biomass for use as energy. GIS-based analysis of geographical availability and locations of wood-fired power plants in Portugal. Applied Energy, 87, 2551-2560
Wolde Bernabas, Lal Pankaj, Alavalapati Janaki, Burli Pralhad, Munsell John (2016): Factors affecting forestland owners' allocation of non-forested land to pine plantation for bioenergy in Virginia. Biomass and Bioenergy, 85, 69-75
Xu Xinliang, Li Shuang, Fu Ying, Zhuang Dafang (2013): An analysis of the geographic distribution of energy crops and their potential for bioenergy production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 59, 325-335
Zhang B., Wang Y. (2013): Biomass processing, conversion and biorefinery. New York, Nova Science Publishers Inc: 457.
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti