Social perception of forest multifunctionality in southern Italy: The case of Calabria Region F., Giacovelli G., Maesano M., Paletto A., Vivona S., Veltri A., Pellicone G., Scarascia Mugnozza G. (2016): Social perception of forest multifunctionality in southern Italy: The case of Calabria Region. J. For. Sci., 62: 366-379.
download PDF
During the last decades, forest management systems involving multifunctionality were developed and implemented at a local level all over Europe. Recently, the international scientific literature focused on the concept of ecosystem services. The substantial difference between forest functions and ecosystem services is that the former implies the capacity of forest ecosystem to supply goods and services to society, the latter focuses on the benefits that people obtain from the ecosystems. The aim of this paper is to analyse the social perception of the importance of forest functions and threats to forest multifunctionality in four case studies in the south of Italy, in the Calabria Region (Pollino, Sila, Catena Costiera and Serre Calabre). The study was structured in four steps: (i) stakeholder analysis, (ii) questionnaire survey, (iii) statistical analysis of the collected data, (iv) development of importance-threat matrices. At the end of the analysis, 71 representative stakeholders were identified and involved in the survey. Besides, the representative stakeholders were classified into four groups of interest according to their characteristics: public administrations, associations-non-governmental organizations, academia and research institutes, professional associations of the forest-wood-energy chain. The stakeholders assigned a level of importance to nine forest functions and to ten threats to multifunctionality using a 5-point Likert scale. The data analysis was elaborated distinguishing between groups of interest and case study areas. The overall results show that the two forest functions perceived as the most important by the involved stakeholders are biodiversity and landscape conservation, while a low importance was assigned to the productive forest functions. Regarding the threats, the overall results show that the most relevant threats are the forest fires that affect all functions followed by illegal cuttings and forest abandonment. The ranking of forest functions is similar in all four case studies, while the threat evaluations are more linked to local contexts.
Aude Erik, Poulsen Roar S. (2000): Influence of management on the species composition of epiphytic cryptogams in Danish Fagus forests. Applied Vegetation Science, 3, 81-88
Balest J., Hrib M., Dobšinská Z., Paletto A. (2016): Analysis of the effective stakeholders' involvement in the development of National Forest Programmes in Europe. International Forestry Review, 18, 13-28
Barbati Anna, Corona Piermaria, Iovino Francesco, Marchetti Marco, Menguzzato Giuliano, Portoghesi luigi (2010): The application of the ecosystem approach through sustainable forest management: an Italian case study. L'Italia Forestale e Montana, , 1-17
Barbier Edward B (2000): Valuing the environment as input: review of applications to mangrove-fishery linkages. Ecological Economics, 35, 47-61
Carvalho-Ribeiro S.M., Lovett A., O’Riordan T. (2010): Multifunctional forest management in Northern Portugal: Moving from scenarios to governance for sustainable development. Land Use Policy, 27, 1111-1122
CFS (2015): Incendi Boschivi 2014. Dati di sintesi. Roma, Corpo Forestale dello Stato: 12.
Clemente P., Calvache M.F., Antunes P., Santos R. (2015): Mapping stakeholders perception on ecosystem services provision within the Portuguese Southwest Alentejo and Vincentine Coast Natural Park. In: 8th Congresso sobre Planeamento e Gestão das Zonas Costeiras dos Países de Expressão Portuguesa, Aveiro, Oct 14–16, 2015: 1–15.
de Groot R.S. (1992): Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision-making. Groningen, Wolters-Noordhoff: 315.
de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. (2010): Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260-272
De Meo Isabella, Cantiani Maria Giulia, Ferretti Fabrizio, Paletto Alessandro (2011): Stakeholders' Perception as Support for Forest Landscape Planning. International Journal of Ecology, 2011, 1-8
Demir Metin, Dindaroğlu Turgay, Yılmaz Sevgi (2014): Effects of forest areas on air quality; Aras Basin and its environment. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 12, 60-
Di Salvatore U., Ferretti F., Cantiani P., Paletto A., De Meo I., Chiavetta U. (2013): Multifunctionality assessment in forest planning at landscape level. The study case of Matese Mountain Community (Italy). Annals of Silvicultural Research, 37: 45–54.
Dieterich V. (1953): Forstwirtschaftspolitik. Eine Einführung. Hamburg, Berlin, Paul Parey Zeitschriftenverlag: 398.
Dobšinská Z., Sarvašová Z. (2016): Perceptions of forest owners and the general public on the role of forests in Slovakia. Acta Silvatica & Lignaria Hungarica, 12: 23–33.
Duvall Matthew D, Grigal David F (1999): Effects of timber harvesting on coarse woody debris in red pine forests across the Great Lakes states, U.S.A.. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 1926-1934
Elia Mario, Lafortezza Raffaele, Tarasco Eustachio, Colangelo Giuseppe, Sanesi Giovanni (2012): The spatial and temporal effects of fire on insect abundance in Mediterranean forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 263, 262-267
FAO (2013): Forests and Water – International Momentum and Action. Rome, FAO: 75.
Farber Stephen C., Costanza Robert, Wilson Matthew A. (2002): Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41, 375-392
Fares Silvano, Mugnozza Giuseppe Scarascia, Corona Piermaria, Palahí Marc (2015): Sustainability: Five steps for managing Europe's forests. Nature, 519, 407-409
Felipe-Lucia María R., Comín Francisco A., Escalera-Reyes Javier (2015): A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services. AMBIO, 44, 308-318
Fernand J. (1995): Multiple-use forestry – a concept of communication. In: Hytönen M. (ed.): Multiple-use Forestry in the Nordic Countries. Helsinki, Finnish Forest Research Institute: 67–80.
Führer Erwin (2000): Forest functions, ecosystem stability and management. Forest Ecology and Management, 132, 29-38
Gasparini P., Tabacchi G. (eds) (2011): L’Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei serbatoi forestali di Carbonio INFC 2005: Secondo inventario forestale nazionale italiano. Metodi e risultati. Bologna, Edagricole: 653.
Green P., Peterken G.F. (1997): Variation in the amount of dead wood in the woodlands of the Lower Wye Valley, UK in relation to the intensity of management. Forest Ecology and Management, 98, 229-238
Grilli Gianluca, Garegnani Giulia, Poljanec Aleš, Ficko Andrej, Vettorato Daniele, De Meo Isabella, Paletto Alessandro (2015): Stakeholder analysis in the biomass energy development based on the experts’ opinions: the example of Triglav National Park in Slovenia. Folia Forestalia Polonica, 57, -
Hierl Lauren A., Franklin Janet, Deutschman Douglas H., Regan Helen M., Johnson Brenda S. (2008): Assessing and Prioritizing Ecological Communities for Monitoring in a Regional Habitat Conservation Plan. Environmental Management, 42, 165-179
Hytönen M. (1995): History, evolution and significance of the multiple-use concept. In: Hytönen M. (ed.): Multiple-use Forestry in the Nordic Countries. Helsinki, Finnish Forest Research Institute: 43–65.
ISTAT (2010): Pressione degli incendi sull'ambiente. Anni 1970–2009. Ambiente e territorio – statistiche in breve. Rome, ISTAT: 6.
Kangas Jyrki, Store Ron (2002): Socioecological landscape planning: an approach to multi-functional forest management. Silva Fennica, 36, -
Kangas Annika, Laukkanen Sanna, Kangas Jyrki (2006): Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—a review. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 77-92
Knickel Karlheinz, Renting Henk (2000): Methodological and Conceptual Issues in the Study of Multifunctionality and Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 512-528
Krieger D.J. (2001): Economic Value of Forest Ecosystem Services: A Review. Washington, D.C., The Wilderness Society: 30.
Kruys Nicholas, Fries Clas, Jonsson Bengt Gunnar, Lämås Tomas, Ståhl Göran (1999): Wood-inhabiting cryptogams on dead Norway spruce ( Picea abies ) trees in managed Swedish boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 178-186
Kumar Sushil, Kant Shashi (2007): Exploded logit modeling of stakeholders' preferences for multiple forest values. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 516-526
Lindberg K., Furze B., Staff M., Black R. (1997): Ecotourism and Other Services Derived From Forests in the Asia-Pacific Region: Outlook to 2010. Washington, D.C., FAO: 79.
Lovreglio R., Marciano A., Patrone A., Leone V. (2012): Forest fire motives in Italy: preliminary results of a pilot survey in the most fire-affected provinces. Forest@, 9: 137–147. (in Italian)
MA (2005): Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report. Washington, D.C., Island Press: 137.
Mander U., Wiggering H., Helming K. (eds) (2007): Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services. Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 421.
Martínez Pastur Guillermo, Peri Pablo L., Lencinas María V., García-Llorente Marina, Martín-López Berta (2016): Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landscape Ecology, 31, 383-399
Michetti Melania, Pinar Mehmet (): Forest Fires in Italy: An Econometric Analysis of Major Driving Factors. SSRN Electronic Journal, , -
Mitchell R., Agle B., Wood D. (1997): Towards a theory of stakeholder identification: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853–886.
Müllerová Jana, Szabó Péter, Hédl Radim (2014): The rise and fall of traditional forest management in southern Moravia: A history of the past 700 years. Forest Ecology and Management, 331, 104-115
Neary Daniel G, Klopatek Carole C, DeBano Leonard F, Ffolliott Peter F (1999): Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis. Forest Ecology and Management, 122, 51-71
Nichiforel L. (2010): Forest owners’ attitudes towards the implementation of multi-functional forest management principles in the district of Suceava, Romania. Annals of Forest Research, 53: 71–80.
Nikodinoska Natasha, Paletto Alessandro, Franzese Pier Paolo, Jonasson Christer (): Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: The Case of the Abisko National Park (Sweden). Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 3, 355-369
Notaro S., Paletto A., Raffaelli R. (2009): Economic impact of forest damage in an Alpine environment. Acta Silvatica & Lignaria Hungarica, 5: 131–143.
ODA (1995): Guidance Note on How to Do Stakeholder Analysis of Aid Projects and Programmes. London, Overseas Development Administration: 10.
Paletto A., De Meo I., Ferretti F. (2011): Participatory governance in forest landscape planning: An application in Southern Italy. Silva Lusitana, 19: 149–163.
Paletto A., De Meo I., Cantiani P., Ferretti F. (2014b): Effects of forest management on the amount of deadwood in Mediterranean oak ecosystems. Annals of Forest Science, 71: 791–800.
Paletto A., Ferretti F., Cantiani P., De Meo I. (2012): Multi-functional approach in forest landscape management planning: an application in Southern Italy. Forest Systems, 21, 68-
Paletto A., Balest J., De Meo I., Giacovelli G., Grilli G. (2014a): Perceived influence and real power of stakeholders in forest management: A case study in Italy. In: Schiberna E., Stark M. (eds): Adaptation in Forest Management Under Changing Framework Conditions. Sopron, Foundation for Sustainable Forest Management: 163–175.
Pukkala T. (2002): Introduction to multi-objective forest planning. In: Pukkala T. (ed.): Multi-objective Forest Planning. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 1–19.
Reed Mark S., Graves Anil, Dandy Norman, Posthumus Helena, Hubacek Klaus, Morris Joe, Prell Christina, Quinn Claire H., Stringer Lindsay C. (2009): Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933-1949
Sagoff Mark (2008): On the Economic Value of Ecosystem Services. Environmental Values, 17, 239-257
TARRANT MICHAEL A., CORDELL H. KEN (2002): Amenity Values of Public and Private Forests: Examining the Value-Attitude Relationship. Environmental Management, 30, 692-703
Urquhart Julie, Courtney Paul, Slee Bill (2012): Private woodland owners’ perspectives on multifunctionality in English woodlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 28, 95-106
Vaglio Laurin G, Hawthorne WD, Chiti T, Di Paola A, Cazzolla Gatti R, Marconi S, Noce S, Grieco E, Pirotti F, Valentini R (2016): Does degradation from selective logging and illegal activities differently impact forest resources? A case study in Ghana. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 9, 354-362
Weiss G. (2001): Mountain Forest Policy in Austria: A Historical Policy Analysis on Regulating a Natural Resource. Environment and History, 7, 335-355
Wunder S., Thorsen B.J. (2014): Ecosystem services and their quantification: What are ecosystem services? In: Thorsen B.J., Mavsar R., Tyrväinen L., Prokofieva I., Stenger A. (eds): The Provision of Forest Ecosystem Services: Quantifying and Valuing Non-marketed Ecosystem Services. Joensuu, European Forest Institute: 17–20.
Zlatanov Tzvetan, Schleppi Patrick, Velichkov Ivaylo, Hinkov Georgi, Georgieva Margarita, Eggertsson Olafur, Zlatanova Magdalena, Vacik Harald (2013): Structural diversity of abandoned chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) dominated forests: Implications for forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 291, 326-335
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences