Provision of ecosystem services in mountain forests – case study of experts’ and stakeholders’ perceptions from Slovakia

https://doi.org/10.17221/48/2016-JFSCitation:Sarvašová Z., Dobšinská Z. (2016): Provision of ecosystem services in mountain forests – case study of experts’ and stakeholders’ perceptions from Slovakia. J. For. Sci., 62: 380-387.
download PDF
Forests in the mountain ranges are supposed to meet multiple objectives at the same time. There are different expectations and priorities among stakeholder groups. The object of the research is the case study area in the Goat Backs Mountains in Slovakia (representing Western Carpathians). The stakeholders’ panel which included local government officials, landowners, foresters, interest group representatives etc. judged the current and future importance of ecosystem services in a special questionnaire. The context analysis provided main strengths and weaknesses, threats and opportunities that influence mountain forest management and the provision and use of ecosystem services in the case study area were done by involved experts from practice and science. Based on the SWOT results a possible strategy for the provision of ecosystem services was proposed. Some of the key issues that have been identified by experts concerning the balancing of ecosystem service provision are: strengthening the local stakeholder involvement; enhancing regional initiatives; and economic market-oriented instruments and economic incentives.
References:
Beckley T., Parkins J., Sheppard S. (2005): Public Participation in Sustainable Forest Management: A Reference Guide. Edmonton, Sustainable Forest Management Network: 60.
 
Brukas V., Sallnäs O. (2011): Forest management plan as a policy instrument: Carrot, stick or sermon? Land Use Policy, 29: 605–613.
 
Costanza Robert, d'Arge Ralph, de Groot Rudolf, Farber Stephen, Grasso Monica, Hannon Bruce, Limburg Karin, Naeem Shahid, O'Neill Robert V., Paruelo Jose, Raskin Robert G., Sutton Paul, van den Belt Marjan (1997): The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260  https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
 
Dax T. (2002): Research on Mountain Development in Europe: Overview of Issues and Priorities. Manuscript. Vienna, Federal Institute for Less-Favoured and Mountainous Areas: 15.
 
de Groot Rudolf S, Wilson Matthew A, Boumans Roelof M.J (2002): A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393-408  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
 
de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. (2010): Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260-272  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
 
De Meo Isabella, Cantiani Maria Giulia, Ferretti Fabrizio, Paletto Alessandro (2011): Stakeholders' Perception as Support for Forest Landscape Planning. International Journal of Ecology, 2011, 1-8  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/685708
 
Kangas A., Kangas J., Kurttila M. (2008): Decision Support for Forest Management. Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 222.
 
Kangas Annika, Laukkanen Sanna, Kangas Jyrki (2006): Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—a review. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 77-92  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.02.004
 
Kohlöffel K.M. (2000): Strategisches Management. München, Carl Hanser Verlag: 262.
 
Krott M. (2005): Forest Policy Analysis. Dordrecht, Springer-Verlag: 323.
 
Kulla L., Bošela M., Burgan K. (2010): Potreba a možnosti inovácie rámcového plánovania HÚL na Slovensku. In: Bortel S., Bavlšík J. (eds): Súčasnost’ a budúcnost’ hospodárskej úpravy lesov na Slovensku. Zvolen, Národné lesnícke centrum: 42–49.
 
Lichý J. (2013): Proposal of model of forest enterprise media communication. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 59: 276–283.
 
Lobriser R., Abplanalp P.A. (1998): Strategisches Management, Visionen entwickeln, Strategien umsetzen, Erfolgspotentiale aufbauen. Zürich, Versus: 468.
 
Martins Helena, Borges José G. (2007): Addressing collaborative planning methods and tools in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 248, 107-118  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.039
 
Martín-López Berta, Iniesta-Arandia Irene, García-Llorente Marina, Palomo Ignacio, Casado-Arzuaga Izaskun, Amo David García Del, Gómez-Baggethun Erik, Oteros-Rozas Elisa, Palacios-Agundez Igone, Willaarts Bárbara, González José A., Santos-Martín Fernando, Onaindia Miren, López-Santiago Cesar, Montes Carlos, Bawa Kamal (2012): Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences. PLoS ONE, 7, e38970-  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
 
Marzano Mariella, Dandy Norman, Bayliss Helen R., Porth Emily, Potter Clive (2015): Part of the solution? Stakeholder awareness, information and engagement in tree health issues. Biological Invasions, 17, 1961-1977  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0850-2
 
O'Brien L., Marzano M., White R. M. (): 'Participatory interdisciplinarity': Towards the integration of disciplinary diversity with stakeholder engagement for new models of knowledge production. Science and Public Policy, 40, 51-61  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs120
 
Paletto Alessandro, Balest Jessica, Demeo Isabella, Giacovelli Grazia, Grilli Gianluca (2016): Power of Forest Stakeholders in the Participatory Decision Making Process: A Case Study in Northern Italy. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica, 12, -  https://doi.org/10.1515/aslh-2016-0002
 
Phalen K. B. (): An Invitation for Public Participation in Ecological Restoration: The Reasonable Person Model. Ecological Restoration, 27, 178-186  https://doi.org/10.3368/er.27.2.178
 
Pukkala T. (2002): Multi-objective forest planning. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 207.
 
Rauch Peter (2007): SWOT analyses and SWOT strategy formulation for forest owner cooperations in Austria. European Journal of Forest Research, 126, 413-420  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0162-2
 
Sarvašová Z, Dobšinská Z, Šálka J (): Public participation in sustainable forestry: the case of forest planning in Slovakia. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, , e1-e9  https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1174-007
 
Sedmák R., Fabrika M., Bahýl J., Pôbiš I., Tuček J. (2013): Application of simulation and optimization tools for developing forest management plans in the Slovak natural and management conditions. In: Tuček J., Smreček R., Majlingová A., Garcia-Gonzalo J. (eds): Implementation of DSS Tools into the Forestry Practice. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 139–152.
 
Shackelford Nancy, Hobbs Richard J., Burgar Joanna M., Erickson Todd E., Fontaine Joseph B., Laliberté Etienne, Ramalho Cristina E., Perring Michael P., Standish Rachel J. (2013): Primed for Change: Developing Ecological Restoration for the 21st Century. Restoration Ecology, 21, 297-304  https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12012
 
Sitarz D. (1993): Agenda 21: The earth summit strategy to save our planet. Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (accessed Jan 15, 2016).
 
Šálka J. (2006): Analýza verejnej politiky v lesníctve. Zvolen, Technická Univerzita vo Zvolene: 64.
 
TEEB (2010): The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. London, Washington, Earthscan: 456.
 
Wallace Ken J. (2007): Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 139, 235-246  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences