Prevention of erosion in mountain basins: A spatial-based tool to support payments for forest ecosystem services

Sacchelli S., Borghi C., Grilli G. (2021): Prevention of erosion in mountain basins: A spatial-based tool to support payments for forest ecosystem services. J. For. Sci., 67: 258–271.

download PDF

This paper presents a spatial-based decision support system (DSS) to assist public and private forest managers in the analysis of potential feasibility in payments for forest ecosystem services (PES) for the prevention of soil erosion. The model quantifies the maximum willingness to pay (WTP) of managers of a reservoir to prevent soil loss. The minimum willingness to accept (WTA) of forest owners for the activation of a private market is also computed. The comparison of WTP and WTA identifies the forest area where PES are ideally feasible with additional potential for compensation to enable the schemes. The DSS highlights forest idiosyncrasies as well as local socio-economic and geomorphological characteristics influencing PES suitability at a geographic level. The potential applications and future improvements of the model are also discussed.

Adger W.N., Brown K., Cervigni R., Moran. D. (1995): Total economic value of forests in Mexico. Ambio, 24: 286–296.
Alarcon G.G., Fantini A.C., Salvador C.H., Farley J. (2017): Additionality is in detail: Farmers’ choices regarding payment for ecosystem services programs in the Atlantic forest, Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies, 54: 177–186.
Alves B., Rigall-I-Torrent R., Ballester R., Benavente J.,
Ferreira O. (2015): Coastal erosion perception and willingness to pay for beach management (Cadiz, Spain). Journal of Coastal Conservation, 19: 269–280.
Asrat P., Belay K., Hamito D. (2004): Determinants of warmers’ willingness to pay for soil conservation practices in the southeastern highlands of Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development, 15: 423–438.
Borrelli P., Schütt B. (2014): Assessment of soil erosion sensitivity and post-timber-harvesting erosion response in a mountain environment of Central Italy. Geomorphology, 204: 412–424.
Borrelli P., Panagos P., Märker M., Modugno S., Schütt B. (2017): Assessment of the impacts of clear-cutting on soil loss by water erosion in Italian forests: First comprehensive monitoring and modelling approach. Catena, 149: 770–781.
Brey R., Riera P., Mogas J. (2007): Estimation of forest values using choice modeling: An application to Spanish forests. Ecological Economics, 64: 305–312.
Colombo S., Hanley N., Calatrava-Requen J. (2005): Designing policy for reducing the off-farm effects of soil erosion using choice experiments. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56: 81–95.
Coppini M., Hermanin L. (2007): Restoration of selective beech coppices: A case study in the Apennines (Italy). Forest Ecology and Management, 249: 18–27.
Cotler H. Ortega-Larrocea M.P. (2006): Effects of land use on soil erosion in a tropical dry forest ecosystem, Chamela watershed, Mexico. Catena, 65: 107–117.
De Rosa P., Cencetti C., Fredduzzi A. (2016): A GRASS tool for the Sediment Delivery Ratio mapping. PeerJ Preprints, 4: e2227v1.
Didoné E.J., Gomes Minella J.P., Evrard O. (2017): Measuring and modelling soil erosion and sediment yields in a large cultivated catchment under no-till of Southern Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research, 174: 24–33.
Dribek A., Voltaire L. (2017): Contingent valuation analysis of willingness to pay for beach erosion control through the stabiplage technique: A study in Djerba (Tunisia). Marine Policy, 86: 17–23.
Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. (2008): Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65: 663–674.
Enriquez-Acevedo T., Botero C.M., Cantero-Rodelo R., Pertuz A., Suarez A. (2018): Willingness to pay for Beach Ecosystem Services: The case study of three Colombian beaches. Ocean & Coastal Management, 161: 96–104.
Faustmann M. (1849): On the determination of the value which forestland and immature stands pose for forestry. Reprinted in Journal of Forest Economics, 1: 7–44.
Förstner U., Salomons W. (2010): Sediment research, management and policy: A decade of JSS. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 10: 1440–1452.
Gaglioppa P., Guadagno R., Marino D., Marucci A., Palmieri M., Pellegrino D., Schirpke U., Caracausi C. (2017): Forest management based on ecosystem services and payments for ecosystem services: considerations after the project LIFE+ Making Good Natura. Forest@ – Journal of Silviculture and Forest Ecology, 14: 99–106.
GRASS Development Team (2019): GRASS GIS 7.6.2dev Reference Manual. Available at: (Accessed March 2, 2020).
Grilli G., Ciolli M., Garegnani G., Geri F., Sacchelli S., Poljanec A., Vettorato D., Paletto A. (2017): A method to assess the economic impacts of forest biomass use on ecosystem services in a National Park. Biomass and Bioenergy, 98: 252–263.
Grilli G., Fratini R., Marone E., Sacchelli S. (2020): A spatial-based tool for the analysis of payments for forest ecosystem services related to hydrogeological protection. Forest Policy and Economics, 111: 102039.
Haines-Young R., Potschin M. (2012): Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services. CICES. Version 4.1. Available at: (Accessed March 2, 2020).
Hausknost D., Grima N., Singh S.J. (2017): The political dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Cascade or stairway? Ecological Economics, 131: 109–118.
Havinga I., Hein L., Vega-Araya M., Languillaume A. (2020): Spatial quantification to examine the effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services: A case study of Costa Rica’s Pago de Servicios Ambientales. Ecological Indicators, 108: 105766.
Jones K.W., Cannon J.B., Saavedra F.A., Kampf S.K., Addington R.N., Cheng A.S., MacDonald L.H., Wilson C., Wolk B. (2017). Return on investment from fuel treatments to reduce severe wildfire and erosion in a watershed investment program in Colorado. Journal of Environmental Management, 198: 66–77.
Jones-Walters L., Mulder I. (2009): Valuing nature: The economics of biodiversity. Journal for Nature Conservation, 17: 245–247.
Lang A.J., Aust W.M., Bolding M.C., McGuire K.J., Schilling E.B. (2017): Comparing sediment trap data with erosion models for evaluation of forest haul road stream crossing approaches. Transactions of the ASABE, 60: 393–408.
Lu Y., He T. (2014): Assessing the effects of regional payment for watershed services program on water quality using an intervention analysis model. Science of the Total Environment, 493: 1056–1064.
Maltsev K., Yermolaev O. (2020): Assessment of soil loss by water erosion in small river basins in Russia. Catena, 195: 104726.
Marchi M., Paletto A., Cantiani P., Bianchetto E., De Meo I. (2018): Comparing thinning system effects on ecosystem services provision in artificial black pine (Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold) forests. Forests, 9: 188.
MEA (2005): Ecosystem and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington D.C., World Resources Institute: 86.
Merlo M. (1991): Elementi di economia ed estimo forestale–ambientale. Bologna, Pàtron Editore: 545. (in Italian)
Nasiri M. (2013): GIS modelling for locating the risk zone of soil erosion in a deciduous forest. Journal of Forest Science, 59: 87–91.
Palmieri M., Gaglioppa P., Guadagno R., Marino D., Marucci A., Pellegrino D., Picchi S. (2014): Modello dimostrativo di valutazione dell’efficacia di gestione. Report del progetto Making Good Natura (LIFE+11 ENV/IT/000168). Rome, CURSA: 129. (in Italian)
Panagos P., Borrelli P., Poesen J., Ballabio C., Lugato E., Meusburger K., Montanarella L., Alewell C. (2015a): The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environmental Science and Policy, 54: 438–447.
Panagos P., Borrelli P., Meusburger K., Alewell C., Lugato E., Montanarella L. (2015b): Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale. Land Use Policy, 48: 38–50.
Paudyal K., Baral H., Bhandari S.P., Bhandari A., Keenan R.J. (2019): Spatial assessment of the impact of land use and land cover change on supply of ecosystem services in Phewa watershed, Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 36: 100895.
Phan T.H.D., Brouwer R., Hoang L.P., Davidson M.D. (2017): A comparative study of transaction costs of payments for forest ecosystem services in Vietnam. Forest Policy and Economics, 80: 141–149.
Ranjan R. (2019): A forestry-based PES mechanism for enhancing the sustainability of Chilika Lake through reduced siltation loading. Forest Policy and Economics, 106: 101944.
Sacchelli S., Zambelli P., Zatelli P., Ciolli M. (2013): Biomasfor: An open-source holistic model for the assessment of sustainable forest bioenergy. iForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry, 6: 285–293.
Sacchelli S., Cipollaro M., Fabbrizzi S. (2018): A GIS-based model for multiscale forest insurance analysis: The Italian case study. Forest Policy and Economics, 92: 106–118.
Sacchelli S., Carrari E., Paoletti E., Anav A., Hoshika Y., Sicard P., Screpanti A., Chirici G., Cocozza C., De Marco A. (2021): Economic impacts of ambient ozone pollution on wood production in Italy. Scientific Reports, 11: 154.
Schmidt M.R., Wei W. (2006): Loss of agro-biodiversity, uncertainty and perceived control: A comparative risk perception study in Austria and China. Risk Analysis, 26: 455–470.
Smith S., Rowcroft P., Everard M., Couldrick L., Reed M., Rogers H., Quick T., Eves C., White C. (2013): Payments for Ecosystem Services: A Best Practice Guide. London, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs of the UK: 85.
Sone J.S., Gesualdo G.C., Zamboni P.A.P., Vieira N.O.M., Mattos T.S., Carvalho G.A., Rodrigues D.B.B., Sobrinho T.A., Oliveira P.T.S. (2019): Water provisioning improvement through payment for ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 655: 1197–1206.
Stone R.P., Hilborn D. (2001): Universal Soil Loss Equation, USLE. Ontario. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Available at:
Wunder S. (2005): Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR, 9. Available at:
Yoo J., Simonit S., Connors J.P., Kinzig A.P., Perrings C. (2014): The valuation of off-site ecosystem service flows: Deforestation, erosion and the amenity value of lakes in Prescott, Arizona. Ecological Economics, 97: 74–83.
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti