Verification of two- and three-parameter simple height-diameter models for birch in the European part of Russia

https://doi.org/10.17221/76/2020-JFSCitation:

Lebedev A., Kuzmichev V. (2020): Verification of two- and three-parameter simple height-diameter models for the birch in the European part of Russia. J. For. Sci., 66: 375–382.

download PDF

The accuracy of determining the height of trees is essential both in forestry and in scientific research. Height is usually determined using specific models, where it is a function of the diameter at breast height. On the materials of 23 sample plots with the measurement of model trees in birch stands, the parameters were determined for 29 two-parameter and three-parameter models that are most often found in literary sources. The following metrics evaluated the quality of the models: root mean square error, mean absolute percentage error, coefficient of determination, adjusted coefficient of determination, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion. Three-parameter models of the dependence of height on diameter by a set of metrics show somewhat better quality than two-parameter models. Nevertheless, in general, the differences between most models are minor. Along with the models selected as the best, the Näslund and Chapman-Richards equations, which are often used in the literature as the most flexible, showed good quality. The methodology of this study allows you to repeat the same work for tree species and forest conditions, for which information on the nature of the relationship of height with diameter is incomplete or missing.

References:
Aertsen W., Kint V., Van Orshoven J., Özkan K., Muys B. (2010): Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests. Ecology Modelling, 221: 1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.01.007
 
Ahmadi K., Alavi S.J., Kouchaksaraei M.T., Aertsen W. (2013): Non-linear height-diameter models for oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) in the Hyrcanian forests, Iran. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, 17: 431–440.
 
Atroshchenko O.A. (2004): Modelirovaniye rosta lesa i lesokhozyaystvennykh protsessov (Modeling forest growth and forestry processes). Minsk, BGTU: 249. (in Russian)
 
Bates D.M., Watts D.G. (1980): Relative curvature measures of nonlinearity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 42: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01094.x
 
Buford M.A. (1986): Height-diameter relationship at age 15 in loblolly pine seed sources. Forest Science, 32: 812–818.
 
Chai Z., Tan W., Li Ya., Yan L., Yuan H., Li Z. (2018): Generalized nonlinear height-diameter models for a Cryptomeria fortunei plantation in the Pingba region of Guizhou Province, China. Web Ecology, 18: 29–35. https://doi.org/10.5194/we-18-29-2018
 
Colbert K.C., Larsen D.R., Lootens J.R. (2002): Height-diameter equations for thirteen midwestern bottomland hardwood species. Norwegian Journal of Applied Forestry, 19: 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/19.4.171
 
Curtis R.O. (1967): Height-diameter and height- diameter-age equations for second growth Douglas-fir. Forest Science, 13: 365–375.
 
Dubenok N.N., Kuzmichev V.V., Lebedev A.V. (2020): The results of experimental work over 150 years in the Forest Experimental District of the Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. Moscow, Nauka Publishers: 382. (in Russian)
 
El Mamoun H.O., El Zein A.I., El Mugira M.I. (2013): Modelling Height-Diameter Relationships of Selected Economically Important Natural Forests Species. Journal of Forest Products & Industries, 2: 34–42.
 
Huang S., Titus S.J., Wiens D.P. (1992): Comparison of nonlinear height-diameter functions for major Alberta tree species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 22: 1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-172
 
Huang S., Price D., Titus S.J. (2000): Development of ecoregion-based height-diameter models for white spruce in boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 129: 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00151-6
 
Huxley J., Teissier G. (1936): Terminology of relative growth rates. Nature, 137: 780–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/137780b0
 
Jiang L., Li Y. (2010): Application of nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach in tree height prediction. Journal of Computers: 5: 1575–1581. https://doi.org/10.4304/jcp.5.10.1575-1581
 
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2002): Anticipating the variance of predicted stand volume and timber assortments with respect to stand characteristics and field measurements. Silva Fennica, 36: 799–811. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.522
 
Kroon J., Andersson B., Mullin T.J. (2008): Genetic variation in the diameter–height relationship in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38: 1493–1503. https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-233
 
Lappi J. (1997): A longitudinal analysis of height-diameter curves. Forest Science, 43: 555–570.
 
Larsen D.R., Hann D.W. (1987): Height-diameter Equations for Seventeen Tree Species in Southwest Oregon. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis: 16.
 
Lei X., Peng C., Wang H., Zhou X. (2009): Individual height–diameter models for young black spruce (Picea mariana) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) plantations in New Brunswick, Canada. The Forestry Chronicle, 85: 43–56.  https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc85043-1
 
Mehtätalo L., de-Miguel S., Gregoire T.G. (2015): Modeling height-diameter curves for prediction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 45: 826–837.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0054
 
Meyer H.A. (1940): A mathematical expression for height curves. Journal of Forestry, 38: 415–420.
 
Näslund M. (1936): Thinning experiments in pine forest conducted by the forest experiment station. Meddelanden fran Statens Skogsforsöksanstalt, 29: 1–169. (in Swedish)
 
Ogana F.N. (2018): Comparison of a modified log-logistic distribution with established models for tree height prediction. Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife & Environment, 10: 49–55.
 
Özçelik R., Yavuz H., Karatepe Y., Gürlevik N., Kiriş R. (2014): Development of ecoregion-based height–diameter models for 3 economically important tree species of southern Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 38: 399–412. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1304-115
 
Peng C., Zhang L., Liu J. (2001): Developing and validating nonlinear height–diameter models for major tree species of Ontario’s boreal forests. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 18: 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/18.3.87
 
Peschel W. (1938): Mathematical methods for growth studies of trees and forest stands and the results of their application. Tharandter Forstliches Jahrbuch, 89: 169–247.
 
Pretzsch H. (2009): Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield: From Measurement to Model. Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 664.
 
Ratkowsky D.A. (1990): Handbook of nonlinear regression. New-York, Marcel and Dekker: 241.
 
Schmidt M., Kiviste A., von Gadow K. (2011): A spatially explicit height-diameter model for Scots pine in Estonia. European Journal of Forest Research, 130: 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0434-8
 
Schnute J. (1981): A versatile growth model with statistically stable parameters. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38: 1128–1140.
 
Sibbesen E. (1981): Some new equations to describe phosphate sorption by soils. Journal of Soil Science, 32: 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1981.tb01686.x
 
Sharma M., Parton J. (2007): Height-diameter equations for boreal tree species in Ontario using a mixed-effects modeling approach. Forest Ecology and Management, 249: 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.006
 
Sharma R.P., Vacek Z., Vacek S. (2016): Nonlinear mixed effect height-diameter model for mixed species forests in the central part of the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 62: 470–484. https://doi.org/10.17221/41/2016-JFS
 
Stage A.R. (1963): A mathematical approach to polymorphic site index curves for grand fir. Forest Science, 9: 167–180.
 
Staudhammer C., LeMay V. (2000): Height prediction equations using diameter and stand density measures. The Forestry Chronicle, 76: 303–309. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc76303-2
 
Wykoff W.R., Crookston N.L., Stage A.R. (1982): User’s Guide to the Stand Prognosis Model. General Technical Report INT-133. Ogden, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 231.
 
Yang R.C., Kozak A., Smith J.H.G. (1978): The potential of Weibull-type functions as flexible growth curves. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 8: 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1139/x78-062
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti