Forest landscape aesthetic quality model (FLAQM): A comparative study on landscape modelling using regression analysis and artificial neural networks

https://doi.org/10.17221/86/2018-JFSCitation:Jahani A. (2019): Forest landscape aesthetic quality model (FLAQM): A comparative study on landscape modelling using regression analysis and artificial neural networks. J. For. Sci., 65: 61-69.
download PDF

Today, the landscape aesthetic quality assessment is more technical and quantitative in environmental management. We aimed at developing artificial neural network (ANN) modelling and multiple regression (MLR) analysis approaches to predict the perceptional aesthetic quality of forest landscapes. The methodology, followed in this paper, can be divided into six distinct parts: (i) selection of representative study sites, (ii) mapping of landscape units, (iii) quantification of naturalness indicators, (iv) visibility analysis, (v) assessment of human perceptions, (vi) ANN and MLR modelling and sensitivity analysis. The results of ANN modelling, especially its high accuracy (R2 = 0.871) in comparison with MLR results (R2 = 0.782), introduced the forest landscape aesthetic quality model (FLAQM) as a comparative model for an assessment of forest landscape aesthetic quality. According to sensitivity analysis, the values of livestock density, tree harvesting, virgin forest, animal grazing, and tree richness were identified as the most significant variables which influence FLAQM. FLAQM can be used to compare the classes of aesthetic quality of forests.

References:
Boillereaux L, Cadet C, Le Bail A (2003): Thermal properties estimation during thawing via real-time neural network learning. Journal of Food Engineering, 57, 17-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00216-9
 
Carvalho-Ribeiro Sónia Maria, Lovett Andrew (2011): Is an attractive forest also considered well managed? Public preferences for forest cover and stand structure across a rural/urban gradient in northern Portugal. Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 46-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.09.003
 
Carvalho-Ribeiro S., Ramos I.L., Madeira L., Barroso F., Menezes H., Pinto Correia T. (2013): Is land cover an important asset for addressing the subjective landscape dimensions? Land Use Policy, 35: 50–60.
 
Chopra P., Sharma R.K., Kumar M. (2014): Regression models for the prediction of compressive strength of concrete with & without fly ash. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, 3: 400–406.
 
De La Fuente De Val G., Mühlhauser S.H. (2014): Visual quality: An examination of a South American Mediterranean landscape, Andean foothills east of Santiago (Chile). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13: 261–271.
 
de Vries Sjerp, de Groot Mirjam, Boers Johnny (2012): Eyesores in sight: Quantifying the impact of man-made elements on the scenic beauty of Dutch landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105, 118-127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.005
 
Dramstad W.E., Tveit M. Sundli, Fjellstad W.J., Fry G.L.A. (2006): Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 465-474 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006
 
Flott Leslie W. (2012): Using the Scatter Diagram Tool to Compare Data, Show Relationship. Metal Finishing, 110, 33-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0576(13)70148-X
 
Franco Daniel, Franco Davide, Mannino Ilda, Zanetto Gabriele (2003): The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62, 119-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00127-5
 
Groot Jeroen C.J., Jellema André, Rossing Walter A.H. (2010): Designing a hedgerow network in a multifunctional agricultural landscape: Balancing trade-offs among ecological quality, landscape character and implementation costs. European Journal of Agronomy, 32, 112-119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.07.002
 
Intharathirat Rotchana, Abdul Salam P., Kumar S., Untong Akarapong (2015): Forecasting of municipal solid waste quantity in a developing country using multivariate grey models. Waste Management, 39, 3-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.026
 
Jahani A. (2019): Sycamore failure hazard classification model (SFHCM): an environmental decision support system (EDSS) in urban green spaces. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 955-964 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1665-3
 
Jahani Ali, Feghhi Jahangir, Makhdoum Majid F., Omid Mahmoud (2015): Optimized forest degradation model (OFDM): an environmental decision support system for environmental impact assessment using an artificial neural network. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59, 222-244 https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1005732
 
Nuruddin Muhd. Fadhil, Ullah Khan Sadaqat, Shafiq Nasir, Ayub Tehmina (2015): Strength Prediction Models for PVA Fiber-Reinforced High-Strength Concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27, 04015034- https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001279
 
Plexida Sofia G., Sfougaris Athanassios I., Ispikoudis Ioannis P., Papanastasis Vasilios P. (2014): Selecting landscape metrics as indicators of spatial heterogeneity—A comparison among Greek landscapes. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 26, 26-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.05.001
 
Ribe Robert G. (2009): In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: The effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 245-260 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.014
 
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences