The crown condition of Norway spruce and occurrence of symptoms caused by Armillaria spp. in mixed stands

https://doi.org/10.17221/86/2020-JFSCitation:

Čermák P., Žid T. (2020): The crown condition of Norway spruce and occurrence of symptoms caused by Armillaria spp. in different mixed stands. J. For. Sci., 66: 483–491.

download PDF

Mixed stands are currently supported as effective management options to reduce forest vulnerability to climate change. However, our issues about benefits of mixtures, mechanisms of their incidence and conditions for their effectiveness have yet been only partly clarified. We assessed the crown condition of Norway spruce (Picea abies /L./ Karst) and occurrence of symptoms caused by Armillaria spp. on spruce in a small area in the Drahanská vrchovina Highlands (Czech Republic) in differently mixed stands in 2002 and 2019. We found that although the broadleaf abundance affected the total defoliation of Norway spruce, the effect was unstable in time. The observed effect of altitudinal zones and Norway spruce abundance on the occurrence of symptoms of Armillaria root rot in spruce was also unstable. The drought during recent four years and the implemented forestry measures (salvage and intermediate felling) can be reasons for the relationship instability. We did not identify any statistically significant relationship between tree species diversity (Simpson’s Index) and defoliation.

References:
Bielak K., Dudzinska M., Pretzsch H. (2014): Mixed stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst] can be more productive than monocultures. Evidence from over 100 years of observation of long-term experiments. Forest Systems, 23: 573–589. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2014233-06195
 
Bussotti F., Feducci M., Iacopetti G., Maggino F., Pollastrini M., Selvi F. (2018): Linking forest diversity and tree health: preliminary insights from a large-scale survey in Italy. Forest Ecosystems: 5, article number: 1212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-018-0130-6
 
Caldwell M.M., Dawson T.E., Richards J.H. (1998): Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots to plants. Oecologia, 113: 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050363
 
Cudlín P., Novotný R., Chmelíková E. (1999): Recognition of Stages of Montane Norway Spruce Response to Multiple Stress Impact Using Crown and Branch Structure Transformation Analysis. Phyton (Austria), Special issue: Plant Physiology, 39: 149–153.
 
Cudlín P., Novotný R., Chmelíková E. (2000): Crown Structure Transformation and Response of Norway Spruce Forests to Multiple Stress Impact In: Klimo E., Hager H., Kulhavý J. (eds.): Spruce Monocultures in Central Europe – Problems and Prospects. EFI Proceedings No. 33: 103–112.
 
Cudlín P., Novotný R., Moravec I., Chmelíková E. (2001): Retrospective evaluation of the response of montane forest ecosystems to multiple stress. Ekológia, 20: 108–124.
 
Čermák P., Rybníček M., Žid T., Steffenrem A., Kolář T. (2019): Site and age-dependent responses of Picea abies growth to climate variability. European Journal of Forest Research, 138: 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-019-01182-6
 
Dálya L.B., Capretti P., Ghelardini L., Jankovský L. (2019): Assessment of presence and distribution of Armillaria and Heterobasidion root rot fungi in the forest of Vallombrosa (Apennines Mountains, Italy) after severe windstorm damage. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 12: 118–124.  https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2929-012
 
de Vries W., Dobbertin M.H., Solberg S., van Dobben H.F., Schaub M. (2014): Impacts of acid deposition, ozone exposure and weather conditions on forest ecosystems in Europe: an overview. Plant and Soil, 380: 1–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2056-2
 
Eichhorn J., Roskams P., Ferretti M., Mues V., Szepesi A., Durrant D. (2010): Visual Assessment of Crown Condition and Damaging Agents. Manual Part IV. In: Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. UNECE ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre, Hamburg. [cited 2017 November 20] Available from: http://www.icp-forests.org/Manual.htm
 
Eickenscheidt N., Augustin N.H., Wellbrock N. (2019): Spatio-temporal modelling of forest monitoring data: modelling German tree defoliation data collected between 1989 and 2015 for trend estimation and survey grid examination using GAMMs. iForest, 12: 338–348.  https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2932-012
 
Felton A., Lindbladh M., Brunet J., Fritz Ö. (2010): Replacing coniferous monocultures with mixed-species production stands: An assessment of the potential benefits for forest biodiversity in northern Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 260: 939–947.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.011
 
Harris I., Jones P.D., Osborn T.J., Lister D.H. (2014): Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations−the CRU TS3.10 dataset. International Journal of Climatology, 34: 623–642.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711
 
Iacopetti G., Bussotti F., Selvi F., Maggino F., Pollastrini M. (2019): Forest ecological heterogeneity determines contrasting relationships between crown defoliation and tree diversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 448: 321–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.06.017
 
Jactel H., Brockerhoff, E.G. (2007): Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecology Letters, 10: 835–848.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01073.x
 
Jules E. S., Carroll A. L., Garcia A. M., Steenbock C. M., Kauffman M. J. (2014): Host heterogeneity influences the impact of a non-native disease invasion on populations of a foundation tree species. Ecosphere, 5: 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00043.1
 
Kambach S., Kühn I., Castagneyrol B., Bruelheide H. (2016): The Impact of Tree Diversity on Different Aspects of Insect Herbivory along a Global Temperature Gradient - A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 11: e0165815.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165815
 
Kozlowski T.T. (1971): Growth and Development of Trees. New York, Academic Pres:443. 
 
Lafond V., Lagarrigues G., Cordonnier T., Courbaud B. (2014): Uneven-aged management options to promote forest resilience for climate change adaptation: effects of group selection and harvesting intensity. Annals of Forest Science, 71: 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0291-y
 
Modrzyński J. (2003): Defoliation of older Norway spruce (Picea abies /L./ Karst.) stands in the Polish Sudety and Carpathian mountains. Forest Ecology and Management, 181: 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00657-6
 
Morrison D., Cruickshank M., Lalumière A. (2014): Control of laminated and Armillaria root diseases by stump removal and tree species mixtures: amount and cause of mortality and impact on yield after 40 years. Forest Ecology and Management, 319: 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.007
 
Parker I., Saunders M., Bontrager M., Weitz A.P., Hendricks R., Magarey R., Suiter K., Gilbert G. S. (2015): Phylogenetic structure and host abundance drive disease pressure in communities. Nature, 520: 542–544. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14372
 
Pettersson M., Stenlid J., Sténs A., Wallertz K. (2016): Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden. Ambio, 45 (Suppl 2): 124–139.
 
Popa I., Badea O., Silaghi D. (2017): Influence of climate on tree health evaluated by defoliation in the ICP level I network (Romania). iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 10: 554–560.  https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2202-009
 
Pretzsch H., Block J., Dieler J., Hoang Dong P., Kohnle U., Nagel J., Spellmann H., Zingg A., (2010): Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech along an ecological gradient. Annals of Forest Science, 67: 712. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010037
 
Pretzsch H., Forrester D.I., Bauhus J. (eds.) (2017): Mixed-Species Forests. Ecology and Management. Springer: 653.
 
Pretzsch H., Rötzer T., Matyssek R., Grams T. E. E., Häberle K.H., Pritsch K., Kerner R., Munch J.C. (2014): Mixed Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) stands under drought: from reaction pattern to mechanism. Trees, 28: 1305–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-1035-9
 
Schuler L.J., Bugmann H., Snell R.S. (2017): From monocultures to mixed-species forests: is tree diversity key for providing ecosystem services at the landscape scale? Landscape Ecology, 32: 1499–1516.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0422-6
 
Simpson E. (1949): Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 163: 688.  https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
 
Solberg S., Aamlid D., Tveito O. E., Lystad S. (2015): Increased needlefall and defoliation in Norway spruce induced by warm and dry weather. Boreal Environment Research, 20: 335–349.
 
Thor M.G., Ståhl J., Stenlid J. (2005): Modelling root rot incidence in Sweden using tree, site and stand variables. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 20: 165–176.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580510008347
 
Vitale M., Proietti C., Cionni I., Fischer R., De Marco A. (2014): Random Forests analysis: a useful tool for defining the relative importance of environmental conditions on crown defoliation. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 225: 1992.
 
Zhang Y., Chen H.Y.H., Reich P.B. (2012): Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Ecology, 100: 742–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x
 
Žemaitis P., Stakenas V. (2016): Ecological factors influencing frequency of Norway spruce butt rot in mature stands in Lithuania. Russian Journal of Ecology, 47: 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413616040172
 
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti