Evaluation of total time consumption in harvester technology deployment in conditions of the forest sector of the Czech Republic

https://doi.org/10.17221/92/2017-JFSCitation:Javůrek P., Dvořák J. (2018): Evaluation of total time consumption in harvester technology deployment in conditions of the forest sector of the Czech Republic. J. For. Sci., 64: 33-42.
download PDF
Cut-to-length technology represents a modern forest logging technology characterized by high performance, efficiency, productivity and work safety. At the same time it is friendly to forest ecosystems. Both acquisition and operating costs of harvester units are high, which requires their year-round utilization. The aim of this paper was to analyse shift time consumptions and thus analyse the common harvester and forwarder work shift. In 2015–2016 we collected time snapshots of harvesters and forwarders of various performance categories and from different production conditions throughout the Czech Republic. Consequently the analysis of work shift time with respect to unit, batch and shift times was conducted. The average duration of a harvester’s work shift was 623 min, out of which operational time amounted to 73.6%. In forwarders the average shift took 520 min, with operational time representing 71.2%. In the course of the analysis and statistical data processing, all the remaining shift times which constitute an average harvester and forwarder work shift were quantified in detail. Work shift utilization ranged from 86.1 to 95.3%.
Aalmo Giovanna Ottaviani, Baardsen Sjur (2017): Environmental factors affecting technical efficiency in Norwegian steep terrain logging crews: a stochastic frontier analysis. Journal of Forest Research, 20, 18-23  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0466-x
Björheden R., Thompson M.A. (2000): An international nomenclature for forest work study. In: Field D.B. (ed.): Proceedings of the 20th IUFRO World Congress – Caring for the Forest: Research in a Changing World, Tampere, Aug 6–12, 1995: 190–215.
Dvořák J. (2007): Performance of tracked harvesters of I class in spruce stands. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 54: 47–56.
Dvořák J., Keivan Behjou F. (2011): Performance standards of medium- and high-power forwarders. In: Kanzian C. (ed.): Proceedings of the 44th International Symposium on Forestry Mechanisation: Pushing the Boundaries with Research and Innovation in Forest Engineering, Graz, Oct 9–13, 2011: 1–12.
Dvořák J., Bystrický R., Hošková P., Hrib M., Jarkovská M., Kováč J., Krilek J., Natov P., Natovová L. (2012): The Use of Harvester Technology in Production Forests. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce, s.r.o.: 156.
Erber Gernot, Holzleitner Franz, Kastner Maximilian, Stampfer Karl (2016): Effect of multi-tree handling and tree-size on harvester performance in small-diameter hardwood thinnings. Silva Fennica, 50, -  https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1428
Forbrig A. (2001): Zur technischen Arbeitsproduktivität von Kranvollernter. Forstechnische Information, 53: 22–25.
Gerasimov Yuri, Sokolov Anton, Syunev Vladimir (2013): Development Trends and Future Prospects of Cut-to-Length Machinery. Advanced Materials Research, 705, 468-473  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.705.468
Ghaffariyan M.R., Apolit R., Kuehmaier M. (2015): Analysis and control of fuel consumption rates of harvesting systems: A review of international studies. Industry Bulletin, 15: 1–4.
Glöde Dan, Sikström Ulf (2001): Two felling methods in final cutting of shelterwood, single-grip harvester productivity and damage to the regeneration. Silva Fennica, 35, -  https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.604
Hiesl P. (2015): Forest harvesting productivity and cost in Maine: New tools and processes. [Ph.D. Thesis.], Orono, Uni-versity of Maine: 143.
Jiroušek R., Klvač R., Skoupý A. (2007): Productivity and costs of the mechanised cut-to-length wood harvesting system in clear-felling operations. Journal of Forest Science, 53: 476–482.
Lazdiņš A., Prindulis U., Kalēja S., Daugaviete M., Zimelis A. (2016): Productivity of Vimek 404 T5 harvester and Vimek 610 forwarder in early thinning. Agronomy Research, 14: 475–484.
Macků J., Dvořák J. (2010): Time expenditure analysis of cut-to-length harvesters in incidential fellings compared with production efficiency. In: Kanzian C. (ed.): Proceedings of the 43th International Symposium on Forestry Mechanisation: Forest Engineering: Meeting the Needs of the Society and the Environment, Padova, July 11–14, 2010: 1–7.
Malík V., Dvořák J. (2007): Harvestorové technologie a vliv na lesní porosty. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce, s.r.o.: 84.
Mederski P.S., Bembenek M., Karaszewski Z., Łacka A., Szczepańska-Álvarez A., Rosińska M. (2016): Estimating and modelling harvester productivity in pine stands of different ages, densities and thinning intensities. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 37: 27–36.
Nakagawa M., Hamatsu J., Saitou T., Ishida H. (2007): Effect of tree size on productivity and time required for work elements in selective thinning by a harvester. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 18: 24–28.
Neruda J., Valenta J. (2003): Factors of the efficiency of harvesters and forwarders in logging. In: Visser R. (ed.): Austro2003: High Tech Forest Operations for Mountainous Terrain, Schlaegl, Oct 5–9, 2003: 1–11.
Nurminen Tuomo, Korpunen Heikki, Uusitalo Jori (2006): Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fennica, 40, -  https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.346
Olivera A., Visser R. (2016): Using the harvester on-board computer capability to move towards precision forestry. New Zealand Journal of Forestry, 60: 3–7.
Palander Teijo, Ovaskainen Heikki, Tikkanen Lasse (2012): An Adaptive Work Study Method for Identifying the Human Factors that Influence the Performance of a Human-Machine System. Forest Science, 58, 377-389  https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.11-013
Purfürst F.T. (2009): Der Einfluss des Menschen auf die Leistung von Harvestersystemen. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Dresden, Institut für Forstnutzung und Forsttechnik: 307.
Simanov V., Macků J., Popelka J. (1993): Nový návrh terénní klasifikace a technologické typizace. Lesnictví – Forestry, 39: 422–428.
Slugeň Jozef, Peniaško Pavel, Messingerová Valéria, Jankovský Martin (2014): Productivity of a John Deere Harvester Unit in Deciduous Stands. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62, 231-238  https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201462010231
Spinelli R., Visser R. (2008): Analyzing and estimating delays in harvester operations. International Journal of Forest En-gineering, 19: 36–41.
Spinelli R., Magagnotti N., Hartsough B. (2011): Productivity norms for harvesters and processors used in Italy. In: Kanzian C. (ed.): Proceedings of the 44th International Symposium on Forestry Mechanisation: Pushing the Boundaries with Research and Innovation in Forest Engineering, Graz, Oct 9–13, 2011: 1–8.
Szewczyk G., Sowa J.M., Dvořák J., Kamiński K., Kulak D., Stańczykiewicz A. (2016): Analysis of accuracy of evaluating the structure of a harvester operator’s workday by work sampling. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 37: 251–259.
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti