Households’ willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ethiopia: A review

https://doi.org/10.17221/94/2022-JFSCitation:

Abdeta D. (2022): Households’ willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ethiopia: A review. J. For. Sci., 68: 437–451.

download PDF

Environmental valuation studies in the context of developing countries have become more frequent in recent years. However, literature which reviews and examines the environmental valuation studies is limited. Thus, this paper performed a literature review on forest contingent valuation studies conducted in the Ethiopian context in the past two decades (2000 to May 2022), focusing on two specific objectives: (i) to examine amounts of resources that households are willing to pay (WTP) for forest conservation, and (ii) to identify determinants of households’ WTP. Results indicate the mean lower annual WTP of USD 0.41 (2.63 birr) and 7.04 man-days per household in money and labour time, respectively. Whereas the mean upper annual WTP of USD 53.52 per household in monetary payment and 94.34 man-days per household in labour time contribution are found for the management and conservation of forest in Ethiopia. The finding reveals that there is a limited proportion of the examined studies that included and estimated WTP in a non-monetary payment vehicle, implying a need for future researches on the topic. The result shows that demographic and socio-economic variables, physical assets ownership, institutional and infrastructural services and bid price variables were the main determinants of households’ WTP. This suggests that the forest conservation intervention program involving public participation in the country needs to consider the identified determinants of WTP in design and implementation of the program. Moreover, the finding indicates the presence of mixed results on the effect and direction in which some determinants of WTP are affected. This recommends a pressing need for comprehensive future studies on the research theme.

References:
Abdeta D. (2022): Willingness to pay for forest conservation in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 16: 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100201
 
Abramson A., Becker N., Garb Y., Lazarovitch N. (2011): Willingness to pay, borrow, and work for rural water service improvements in developing countries. Water Resources Research, 47: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010147
 
Adams C., Seroa da Motta R., Ortiz R.A., Reid J., Ebersbach Aznar C., de Almeida Sinisgalli P.A. (2008): The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil). Ecological Economics, 66: 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.008
 
Alam K. (2006): Valuing the environment in developing countries: Problems and potentials. Asia Pacific Journal on Environment and Development, 13: 27–44.
 
Alemu G.T., Tsunekawa A., Haregeweyn N., Nigussie Z., Tsubo M., Elias A., Ayalew Z., Berihun D., Adgo E., Meshesha D.T., Molla D., Okoyo E.N., Zemedu L. (2021): Smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for sustainable land management practices in the Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23: 5640–5665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00835-6
 
Amare D., Mekuria W., T/wold T., Belay B., Teshome A., Yitaferu B., Tessema T., Tegegn B. (2016): Perception of local community and the willingness to pay to restore church forests: The case of Dera district, northwestern Ethiopia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 25: 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2015.1133330
 
Ansong M., Roskaft E. (2014): Local communities’ willingness to pay for sustainable forest management in Ghana. Journal of Energy and Natural Resource Management, 1: 80–87.
 
Ariyo O.C., Okojie L.O., Ariyo M.O. (2018): Villagers willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology, 23: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2018/40142
 
Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E.E., Radner R., Schuman H. (1993): Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Available at: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4473366/mod_folder/intro/Arow_WTP.pdf
 
Asrat P., Belay K., Hamito D. (2004): Determinants of farmers’ willingness to pay for soil conservation practices in the southeastern highlands of Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development, 15: 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.623
 
Ayenew B., Belay A., Tesfay Y. (2015): Economic value of Wondo Genet catchment forest in domestic water supply services, southern Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6: 213–221.
 
Bamwesigye D., Hlavackova P., Sujova A., Fialova J., Kupec P. (2020): Willingness to pay for forest existence value and sustainability. Sustainability, 12: 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030891
 
Belay G., Ketema M., Hasen M. (2020): Households’ willingness to pay for soil conservation on communal lands: Application of the contingent valuation method in north eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63: 2227–2245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1717933
 
Belay K. (2017): Farmers’ willingness to pay for improved soil conservation practices in Kuyu woreda, North Shoa zone of Oromia, Ethiopia: Application of contingent valuation method. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and Management Studies, 5: 39–48. https://doi.org/10.12816/0039980
 
Belay K. (2018): Economic Value of Improved Potable Water Supply: Application of Contingent Valuation Method: Evidence from Mettu Town, Ethiopia. Abyssinia Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3: 22–31.
 
Blomquist G.C., Blumenschein K., Johannesson M. (2009): Eliciting willingness to pay without bias using follow-up certainty statements: Comparisons between probably/definitely and a 10-point certainty scale. Environmental and Resource Economics, 43: 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9242-8
 
Blumenschein K., Blomquist G.C., Johannesson M., Horn N., Freeman P. (2008): Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: Evidence from a field experiment. Economic Journal, 118: 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02106.x
 
Bonnichsen O., Ladenburg J. (2009): Using an ex-ante entreaty to reduce protest zero bias in stated preference surveys – A health economic case. Journal of Choice Modelling, 2: 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70010-1
 
Carson R.T. (2012): Contingent valuation: A practical alternative when prices aren’t available. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26: 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.27
 
Carson R.T., Flores N.E., Meade N.F. (2001): Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19: 173–210. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011128332243
 
Champ P.A., Bishop R.C. (2001): Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19: 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011604818385
 
Chazdon R.L., Brancalion P.H.S., Laestadius L., Bennett-Curry A., Buckingham K., Kumar C., Moll-Rocek J., Vieira I.C.G., Wilson S.J. (2016): When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration. Ambio, 45: 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0772-y
 
Cummings R.G., Taylor L. (1999): Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. American Economic Review, 89: 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.649
 
Davis R.K. (1963): Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal, 3: 239–249.
 
Diafas I., Barkmann J., Mburu J. (2017): Measurement of bequest value using a non-monetary payment in a choice experiment – The case of improving forest ecosystem services for the benefit of local communities in rural Kenya. Ecological Economics, 140: 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.006
 
Diamond P.A., Hausman J.A. (1994): Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 45–64.
 
Dudley N., Phillips A. (2006): Forests and Protected Areas: Guidance on the Use of the IUCN Protected Area Management Categories. Gland, Cambrdige, IUCN: 58.
 
Durand-Morat A., Wailes E.J., Nayga Jr. R.M. (2016): Challenges of conducting contingent valuation studies in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98: 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav068
 
Endalew B., Assefa Wondimagegnhu B. (2019): Determinants of households’ willingness to pay for the conservation of church forests in northwestern Ethiopia: A contingent valuation study. Cogent Environmental Science, 5: 1570659. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2019.1570659
 
Endalew B., Wondimagegnhu B.A., Tassie K. (2020): Willingness to pay for church forest conservation: A case study in northwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Forest Science, 66: 105–116. https://doi.org/10.17221/154/2019-JFS
 
Entele B.R., Emodi N.V. (2016): Health insurance technology in Ethiopia: Willingness to pay and its implication for health care financing. American Journal of Public Health Research, 4: 98–106.
 
Eom Y.S., Larson D.M. (2006): Valuing housework time from willingness to spend time and money for environmental quality improvements. Review of Economics of the Household, 4: 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-006-0008-1
 
FAO (2020): Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020. Key Findings. Rome, FAO: 16.
 
Farmer M.C., Lipscomb C.A. (2008): Conservative dichotomous choice responses in the active policy setting: DC rejections below WTP. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39: 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9106-7
 
Foster H., Burrows J. (2017): Hypothetical bias: A new meta-analysis. Contingent valuation of environmental goods. In: McFadden D., Train K. (eds): Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing: 270–291.
 
FRL (2017): Ethiopia’s Forest Reference Level Submission to the UNFCCC. Available at: https://redd.unfccc.int/files/ethiopia_frel_3.2_final_modified_submission.pdf
 
Gebrehiwot S.G., Bewket W., Gärdenäs A.I., Bishop K. (2014): Forest cover change over four decades in the Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia: Comparison of three watersheds. Regional Environmental Change, 14: 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0483-x
 
Gelo D., Koch S.F. (2015): Contingent valuation of community forestry programs in Ethiopia: Controlling for preference anomalies in double-bounded CVM. Ecological Economics, 114: 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.014
 
Getachew T. (2018): Estimating willingness to pay for forest ecosystem conservation: The case of Wof-Washa Forest, North Shewa Zone, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Resources Development and Management, 46: 46–61.
 
Getahun E. (2020): Ethiopia to grow 5 billion trees in the second green legacy campaign. Available at: https://www.worldagroforestry.org/blog/2020/06/09/ethiopia-grow-5-billion-trees-second-green-legacy-campaign
 
Gibson J.M., Rigby D., Polya D.A., Russell N. (2016): Discrete choice experiments in developing countries: Willingness to pay versus willingness to work. Environmental and Resource Economics, 65: 697–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9919-8
 
Girma W., Beyene F. (2012): Willingness to contribute to collective forest management: Evidence from Godere in the Gambela Region of Ethiopia. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41: 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.10.015
 
Gordillo F., Elsasser P., Günter S. (2019): Willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ecuador: Results from a nationwide contingent valuation survey in a combined “referendum” – “Consequential open-ended” design. Forest Policy and Economics, 105: 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.002
 
Haab T.C., Interis M.G., Petrolia D.R., Whitehead J.C. (2013): From hopeless to curious? Thoughts on Hausman’s “dubious to hopeless” critique of contingent valuation. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 35: 593–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppt029
 
Harrison G.W., Rutström E.E. (2008): Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. In: Plott C.R., Smith V.L. (eds): Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 752–767.
 
Hausman J. (2012): Contingent valuation: From dubious to hopeless. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26: 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.43
 
Hung L.T., Loomis J.B., Thinh V.T. (2007): Comparing money and labour payment in contingent valuation: The case of forest fire prevention in Vietnamese context. Journal of International Development, 19: 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1294
 
Ibsa B. (2020): Households willingness to pay for improved water services: The case of Burayu town administration: Application of contingent valuation method. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11: 1–18.
 
Kassahun E., Taw T.B. (2022): Willingness to pay for conservation of African baobab tree in Ethiopia (A case study of Abergele woreda): Contingent valuation approach. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 41: 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2021.1903931
 
Kassahun H.T., Jacobsen J.B., Nicholson C.F. (2020): Revisiting money and labor for valuing environmental goods and services in developing countries. Ecological Economics, 177: 106771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106771
 
Kling C.L., Phaneuf D.J., Zhao J. (2012): From Exxon to BP: Has some number become better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26: 3–26.
 
Lawton R.N., Mourato S., Fujiwara D., Bakhshi H. (2020): Comparing the effect of oath commitments and cheap talk entreaties in contingent valuation surveys: A randomised field experiment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9: 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2019.1689174
 
Lemessa D., Chala D. (2022): Determinants of local community’s willingness to pay for forest conservation in evergreen Afromontane ecosystem of southwest Ethiopia. Journal of Global Ecology and Environment, 14: 28–38.
 
Lemenih M., Kassa H. (2014): Re-greening Ethiopia: History, challenges and lessons. Forests, 5: 1896–1909. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5081896
 
List J.A. (2001): Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards. American Economic Review, 91: 1498–1507. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1498
 
List J.A., Gallet C.A. (2001): What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Environmental and Resource Economics, 20: 241–254.
 
Little J., Berrens R. (2004): Explaining disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values: Further investigation using meta-analysis. Economics Bulletin, 3: 1–13.
 
Loomis J. (2014): 2013 WAEA keynote address: Strategies for overcoming hypothetical bias in stated preference surveys. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 39: 34–46.
 
MEFCC (2018): National Forest Sector Development Program, Ethiopia. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MEFCC), Volume III: Synthesis Report. Addis Ababa, MEFCC: 117.
 
Mekonnen A. (2000): Valuation of community forestry in Ethiopia: A contingent valuation study of rural households. Environment and Development Economics, 5: 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X00000188
 
Mekonnen A., Köhlin G., Carlsson F. (2004): Contingent Valuation of Community Plantations in Ethiopia: A Look Into Value Elicitation Formats and Intra-Household Preference Variations. Working Papers in Economics No. 151. Gothenburg, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics: 18.
 
Mengistu T. (2006): Frontier community valuation for forest patches: The case of Wondo-Wosha subcatchment, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Region, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources, 8: 281–293.
 
Mezgebo A. (2012): Households’ willingness to pay for restoring environmental resource: A case study of forest resource from Dire Dawa area, Eastern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Economics, 21: 33–62.
 
Minyihun A., Gebregziabher M.G., Gelaw Y.A. (2019): Willingness to pay for community-based health insurance and associated factors among rural households of Bugna District, Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes, 12: 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4091-9
 
Mitchell C.R., Carson R.T. (1989): Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Methods. Washington D.C., RFF Press: 463.
 
Mogaka H., Simons G., Turpie J., Emerton J., Karanja F. (2001): Economic Aspects of Community Involvement in Sustainable Forest Management in Eastern and Southern Africa. Nairobi, IUCN: 153.
 
Morrison M., Brown T.C. (2009): Testing the effectiveness of certainty scales, cheap talk, and dissonance-minimization in reducing hypothetical bias in contingent valuation studies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44: 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9287-3
 
Murphy J.J., Stevens T., Weatherhead D. (2005): Is cheap talk effective at eliminating hypothetical bias in a provision point mechanism? Environmental and Resource Economics, 30: 327–343.
 
Negewo E.N., Ewnetu Z., Tesfaye Y. (2016): Economic valuation of forest conserved by local community for carbon sequestration: The case of Humbo community assisted natural regeneration afforestation/reforestation (A/R) carbon sequestration project; SNNPRS, Ethiopia. Low Carbon Economy, 7: 88–105. https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2016.72009
 
Pawar K.V., Rothkkar R.V. (2015): Forest conservation and awareness. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 11: 212–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2015.06.027
 
Perman R., Ma Y., McGilvray J., Common M. (2003): Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. Harlow, Pearson Education Limited: 699.
 
Rai R.K., Scarborough H. (2015): Nonmarket valuation in developing countries: Incorporating labour contributions in environmental benefits estimates. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 59: 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12071
 
Shyamsundar P., Kramer R.A. (1996): Tropical forest protection: An empirical analysis of the costs borne by local people. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31: 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0036
 
Singh S.N. (2020): Household’s willingness to pay for improved water supply services in Mettu Town: An assessment. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4: 86–99. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.4(1).86-99.2020
 
Sutton W.R., Larson D.M., Jarvis L.S. (2008): Assessing the costs of living with wildlife in developing countries using willingness to pay. Environment and Development Economics, 13: 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004397
 
Temesgen Y. (2015): Valuing community based forest landscapes restoration: The bivariate probit analysis for degraded forest lands in north western Ethiopia. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research, 8: 59–63.
 
Tilahun M., Vranken L., Muys B., Deckers J., Gebregziabher K., Gebrehiwot K., Bauer H., Mathijs E. (2015): Rural households’ demand for frankincense forest conservation in Tigray, Ethiopia: A contingent valuation analysis. Land Degradation and Development, 26: 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2207
 
Tiruneh A.L. (2013): Determinants of willingness to pay for conservation and rehabilitation of bamboo forest: The case of Bambasi woreda, Benishangul Gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia. [M.Sc. Thesis.] Haramaya, Haramaya University.
 
Seifu T., Batu M.M., Alemu A. (2017): Economic valuation natural forest: The case of Sheka forest, south west Ethiopia. Journal of Resources Development and Management, 37: 30–38.
 
UN (1992): Agenda 21, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
 
UNEP (2016): The Contribution of Forests to National Income in Ethiopia and Linkages with REDD+. Nairobi, United Nations Environment Programme: 65.
 
Venkatachalam L. (2004): The contingent valuation method: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24: 89–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00138-0
 
Vondolia G.K., Eggert H., Navrud S., Stage J. (2014): What do respondents bring into contingent valuation? A comparison of monetary and labour payment vehicles. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3: 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2014.892034
 
Walle Y., Nayak D. (2021): How do local communities valuate forest conservation through participatory management? A case of Amhara Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 20: 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2021.120436
 
Whittington D. (2002): Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22: 323–367. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015575517927
 
Whittington D. (2010): What have we learned from 20 years of stated preference research in less-developed countries? Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2: 209–236.
 
Whittington D., Pagiola S. (2012): Using contingent valuation in the design of payments for environmental services mechanisms: A review and assessment. World Bank Research Observer, 27: 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lks004
 
Yibeltal T., Badassa W., Etensa T., Shewangza M. (2017): Contingent valuations of indigenous timber tree resources: The case of Cheha district, Gurage Zone, Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 8: 93–101.
 
Zelalem S., Gemechu A., Tesso A. (2019): Farm households’ willingness to contribute labor for conservation of bamboo forest ecosystem: The case of Mao Komo special woreda Benishangul Gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia. Finance and Economics Review, 1: 41–63.
 
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti