Performance evaluation of spirodiclofen, spirotetramat and carboxymethyl cellulose-B for management of Cacopsylla pyri

Nađ Đ., Marinković D. (2022): Performance evaluation of spirodiclofen, spirotetramat and carboxymethyl cellulose-B
for management of Cacopsylla pyri. Plant Protect. Sci., 58: 70-75.

download PDF

The pear psyllid [Cacopsylla pyri (L.), (Hemiptera: Psyllidae)] represents one of the most economically significant pests of pear in Serbia and worldwide. It causes direct damage throughout feeding on young stems and leaves, but also creates favourable conditions for the development of plant diseases. In this article susceptibility of C. pyri to spirodiclofen, spirotetramat, and their combinations with foliar fertilizer (carboxymethyl cellulose-boron, CMC-B) was investigated in order to assess their efficacy. Experiments were conducted in accordance with standard OEPP/EPPO methods, in field trials on two localities in the Republic of Serbia (Kula, Vrbas), during 2020/21. Results of the field trials indicate good efficacy for all variants in pear psyllid control in pear orchards. The high efficacy of spirodiclofen (87.4–95.4%), spirotetramat (82.5–91.8%), spirodiclofen + CMC-B (90.3–99.8%), spirotetramat + CMC-B (89.5–96.8%) was achieved at both localities seven days after treatment during 2020/21 field trials. Also, it can be concluded for examinations 14 days after treatment, where the efficacy of spirodiclofen (84.9–92.0%), spirotetramat (81.2–91.7%), spirodiclofen + CMC-B (88.9–97.5%), and spirotetramat + CMC-B (82.3–92.5%) was high at both of investigated localities. Based on the obtained results it can be concluded that the high efficacy of the researched insecticides is a good indicator of C. pyri susceptibility in pear orchards.


Arnaudov V. (2016a): Efficacy and timing of some new products against pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyri L.)(Hemiptera: Psyllidae): I. Spirotetramat. Agricultural Science and Technology, 8: 213–216.
Arnaudov V. (2016b): Efficacy and timing of some new products against pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyri L.)(Hemiptera: Psyllidae): II. Spirodiclofen. Agricultural Science and Technology, 8: 306–309.
Civolani S., Boselli M., Butturini A., Chicca M., Cassanelli S., Tommasini M.G., Fano E.A. (2015): Testing spirotetramat as an alternative solution to abamectin for Cacopsylla pyri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) control: Laboratory and field tests. Journal of Economic Entomology, 108: 2737–2742.
Elbert A., Bruck E., Sone S., Toledo A. (2002): Worldwide uses of the new acaricide Envidor in perennial crops. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer, 55: 287–304.
Erler F. (2004): Natural enemies of the pear psylla Cacopsylla pyri in treated vs untreated pear orchards in Antalya, Turkey. Phytoparasitica, 32: 295–304.
Henderson C.F., Tilton E.W. (1955): Tests with acaricides against the brow wheat mite. Journal of Economic Entomology, 48: 157–161.
Injac M., Jeličić P. (2020): [Control of Nezara viridula and Halyomorpha halys on soybeans]. [Bulletin "For our country"], 88: 32–36. Serbian.
Jaworska K., Olszak R.M., Łabanowska B.H., Korzeniowski M. (2012): Efficacy of spirotetramat in the control of pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyri L.) on pear trees in Poland. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 20: 91–106.
Jerinić-Prodanović D., Protić L., Mihajlović L. (2010): Predatori i parazitoidi Cacopsylla pyri (L.) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) u Srbiji [Predators and parasitoids of Cacopsylla pyri (L.) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Serbia]. Pesticides and Phytomedicine, 25: 29–42. Serbian with English abstract.
Kumar B.V., Kuttalam S. (2009): Toxicity of spirotetramat 150 OD – A new insecticide molecule against natural enemies of chillies. Journal of Plant Protection and Environment, 6: 1–5.
Marčić D., Perić P., Ogurlić I., Prijović M., Andrić G. (2007): Effectiveness of spirodiclofen in the control of European red mite (Panonychus ulmi) on apple and pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyri). Pesticides and Phytomedicine, 22: 301–309.
Marčić D., Perić P., Prijović M., Ogurlić I. (2009): Field and greenhouse evaluation of rapeseed spray oil against spider mites, green peach aphid and pear psylla in Serbia. Bulletin of Insectology, 62: 159–167.
Mansour R., Suma P., Mazzeo G., Grissa Lebdi K., Russo A. (2011): Evaluating side effects of never insecticides on the vine mealybug parasitoid Anagyrus sp. near pseudococci, with implications for integrated pest management in vineyards. Phytoparasitica, 39: 369–376.
OEPP/EPPO (2004): PP 1/44(2) – Cacopsylla spp.: Efficacy evaluation of plant protection products. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, 3: 64–67.
OEPP/EPPO (2012): PP 1/152(4) – Design and analysis of efficacy evaluation trials. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 42: 367–381.
Pasqualini E., Scannavini M. (2014): Spirotetramat (Movento®): Efficacy and timing trials to control Cacopsylla pyri. In: Atti, Giornate Fitopatologiche, Mar 18–21, 2014, Siena, Italy: 37–44.
Pasqualini E., Civolani S., Corelli G. (2002): Particle film technology: Approach for a biorational control of Cacopsylla pyri (Rhynchota, Psyllidae) in Northern Italy. Bulletin of Insectology, 55: 39–42.
Salazar-López N.J., Aldana-Madrid M.L., Silveira-Gramont M.I., Aguiar H.L. (2016): Spirotetramat – An alternative for the control of parasitic sucking insects and its fate in the environment. In: Tardan S. (ed.). Insecticide Resistance. London, IntechOpen: 41–55.
Saour G., Ismail H., Hashem A. (2010): Impact of kaolin particle film, spirodiclofen acaricide, harpin protein, and an organic biostimulant on pear psylla Cacopsylla pyri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). International Journal of Pest Management, 56: 75–79.
Sigsgaard L., Esbjerg P., Philipsen H. (2006): Controling pear psylids by massreleasing Anthocoris nemoralis and A. nemorum (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 14: 89–98.
Schoevaerts C., Bangels E., Van Waetermeulen X., Belien T., Haas M., Maeyer L.D., Petre R. (2015): Complementary strategy based on flupyradifurone (Sivanto prime®) and Spirotetramat (Movento®) for integrated Cacopsylla pyri control in IPM pears with focus on the temporal discrimination towards beneficials. Acta Horticulturae, 1094: 463–470.
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti