Investigation on the incidence of Plum pox virus in fruit nurseries of the Czech Republic
Jaroslav Polák, Petr Komínekhttps://doi.org/10.17221/117/2015-PPSCitation:Polák J., Komínek P. (2016): Investigation on the incidence of Plum pox virus in fruit nurseries of the Czech Republic. Plant Protect. Sci., 52: 158-163.
Nine different visual evaluations of Plum pox virus (PPV) presence were carried out in four nurseries during 2012–2015. Results of visual evaluation were verified by ELISA. The presence of PPV was confirmed by ELISA in all the trees showing PPV symptoms. PPV has never been detected by ELISA in trees without PPV symptoms on leaves. A very low occurrence of PPV was proved in plums in all the four nurseries. There were two cases of higher occurrence of PPV in plum cultivars, where PPV originated from infected grafts. The PPV occurrence was 0.126 and 1.59%. The average occurrence of PPV in plums was 0.075%, 93 trees out of 123 630 inspected were PPV-infected. All the PPV-infected trees were destroyed immediately. No new PPV infection was proved later in season (August–September). In comparison with the situation in the 60s of the last century, the PPV occurrence in plums was 2.48% in one nursery in 1963 and there were nurseries with PPV occurrence exceeding 5%. All growing plants were destroyed in this case. The occurrence of PPV in the Czech fruit nurseries today is more than hundred times lower in comparison with the situation fifty years ago. The incidental occurrence of PPV in nurseries cannot be excluded in countries and areas with the endemic presence of PPV (in the Czech Republic and in most European countries). Visual inspection of PPV symptoms in nurseries confirmed by ELISA testing is sufficient. Infected plants must be removed immediately.Keywords:
sharka disease; plum; apricot; peach; incidence; nurseriesReferences:
Acuña R. (1993): Outbreaks of Plum pox virus in Chile. European & Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) Conference Plum pox virus, Aug 5–8, 1993, Bordeaux, France. Paris, EPPO.Atanasoff D. (1933): Plum Pox. A New Virus Disease. Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Sofia Yearbook (1932–1933), Vol. 11: 49–69.Blattný C. (1930): Poznámky o virových a příbuzných chorobách rostlin I. Ochrana Rostlin, 10: 130–138.Cambra M., Capote N., Myrta A., Llácer G. (2006): Plum pox virus and the estimated costs associated with sharka disease. EPPO Bulletin, 36, 202-204 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2006.01027.xClark M. F., Adams A. N. (1977): Characteristics of the Microplate Method of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Detection of Plant Viruses. Journal of General Virology, 34, 475-483 https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-475Zotto A. Dal, Ortego J. M., Raigón J. M., Caloggero S., Rossini M., Ducasse D. A. (2006): First Report in Argentina of Plum pox virus Causing Sharka Disease in Prunus. Plant Disease, 90, 523-523 https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-0523CDunéz J (1987): Plum pox disease of stone fruit trees. Rome, FAO.Levy L., Damsteegt V., Welliver R. (2000): First Report of Plum pox virus (Sharka Disease) in Prunus persica in the United States. Plant Disease, 84, 202-202 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.2.202BLLÁCER G., CAMBRA M., LAVIÑA A. (1985): Detection of plum pox virus in Spain. EPPO Bulletin, 15, 325-329 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.1985.tb00235.xLouro D., Corvo L.M. (1985): Occurrence of sharka in Portugal. Acta Horticulturae, 193: 183Maejima Kensaku, Hoshi Hideo, Hashimoto Masayoshi, Himeno Misako, Kawanishi Takeshi, Komatsu Ken, Yamaji Yasuyuki, Hamamoto Hiroshi, Namba Shigetou (2010): First report of plum pox virus infecting Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.) in Japan. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 76, 229-231 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-010-0233-6Polák J. (1964): Výskyt virových chorob v ovocných školkách okresu Jičín a možnosti ochrany. [Diploma Work.] Prague, Czech University of Agriculture.Polák J., Oukropec I., Komínek P., Krška B., Bittóová M. (1997): Detection and evaluation of resistance of apricots and peaches to plum pox virus. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz/Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 104: 466–473.Polák J., Oukropec I., Krška B., Pívalová J., Miller W.R. (2003): Difference in reactions of apricot and peach cultivars to Plum pox virus: serological and symptomatological evaluation. Horticultural Science (Prague), 30: 129–134.Polák Jaroslav, Komínek Petr (): Evaluation of rootstocks of stone fruits for resistance to natural Plum pox virus infection. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 36, 116-120 https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2013.873081ROY A. S., SMITH I. M. (1994): Plum pox situation in Europe. EPPO Bulletin, 24, 515-523 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.1994.tb01064.xThompson D., McCann M., MacLeod M., Lye D., Green M., James D. (2001): First Report of Plum Pox Potyvirus in Ontario, Canada. Plant Disease, 85, 97-97 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.1.97C